{"title":"心理学教科书中的种族代表性","authors":"Karim Bettache","doi":"10.1111/josi.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present research examines racial representation in psychology textbooks and its impact on students' personal relatability to psychological theories through two interconnected studies. Study 1 analyzed racial and skin tone representation across five psychology textbooks used in East/Southeast Asian universities, revealing significant overrepresentation of White individuals (66% of images) and light skin tones (68% of images) despite serving predominantly non-White student populations. Study 2 experimentally tested how representational (in)congruence affects Hong Kong Chinese university students' ability to personally relate to psychological content. Results showed significantly higher personal relatability to psychological theories when materials featured both ethnically and linguistically congruent content compared to incongruent content (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This relationship was fully mediated by students' perception of textbook images as representing their ingroup. The findings demonstrate how global power asymmetries in knowledge production continue to shape psychological education across geopolitical contexts, particularly through the persistent dominance of Western/White representations in educational materials used internationally. This research contributes to understanding how colonial-era social hierarchies are reproduced through contemporary academic practices, offering practical implications for decolonizing psychological pedagogy and creating more internationally relevant educational materials.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Representation in Psychology Textbooks\",\"authors\":\"Karim Bettache\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josi.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The present research examines racial representation in psychology textbooks and its impact on students' personal relatability to psychological theories through two interconnected studies. Study 1 analyzed racial and skin tone representation across five psychology textbooks used in East/Southeast Asian universities, revealing significant overrepresentation of White individuals (66% of images) and light skin tones (68% of images) despite serving predominantly non-White student populations. Study 2 experimentally tested how representational (in)congruence affects Hong Kong Chinese university students' ability to personally relate to psychological content. Results showed significantly higher personal relatability to psychological theories when materials featured both ethnically and linguistically congruent content compared to incongruent content (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This relationship was fully mediated by students' perception of textbook images as representing their ingroup. The findings demonstrate how global power asymmetries in knowledge production continue to shape psychological education across geopolitical contexts, particularly through the persistent dominance of Western/White representations in educational materials used internationally. This research contributes to understanding how colonial-era social hierarchies are reproduced through contemporary academic practices, offering practical implications for decolonizing psychological pedagogy and creating more internationally relevant educational materials.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"81 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The present research examines racial representation in psychology textbooks and its impact on students' personal relatability to psychological theories through two interconnected studies. Study 1 analyzed racial and skin tone representation across five psychology textbooks used in East/Southeast Asian universities, revealing significant overrepresentation of White individuals (66% of images) and light skin tones (68% of images) despite serving predominantly non-White student populations. Study 2 experimentally tested how representational (in)congruence affects Hong Kong Chinese university students' ability to personally relate to psychological content. Results showed significantly higher personal relatability to psychological theories when materials featured both ethnically and linguistically congruent content compared to incongruent content (p < 0.05). This relationship was fully mediated by students' perception of textbook images as representing their ingroup. The findings demonstrate how global power asymmetries in knowledge production continue to shape psychological education across geopolitical contexts, particularly through the persistent dominance of Western/White representations in educational materials used internationally. This research contributes to understanding how colonial-era social hierarchies are reproduced through contemporary academic practices, offering practical implications for decolonizing psychological pedagogy and creating more internationally relevant educational materials.
期刊介绍:
Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.