当不重要是重要的:重新思考种族,移民,以及受害者不愿向警察报告和使用受害者服务的神话

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Hyunjung Shim, Sarayu Cheemalapati
{"title":"当不重要是重要的:重新思考种族,移民,以及受害者不愿向警察报告和使用受害者服务的神话","authors":"Hyunjung Shim,&nbsp;Sarayu Cheemalapati","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public discourse often portrays victims of racial, ethnic, or immigrant minorities as more reluctant to engage in police or seek further help. Yet, this perception remains largely unexamined through empirical research. This study tests the correlates of police notification and victim service utilization among victims of violence, with particular focus on how race/ethnicity and immigration status—key components of sociostructural positioning—interact. Drawing on the Multilevel, Contextualized Help-Seeking Model, we analyzed data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) from 2017 to 2023. We estimate multilevel logistic models of police reporting and service use, while accounting for selection bias in the victim sample. Findings reveal that Black victims generally had higher odds of notifying police than White victims. However, this trend reverses for Black foreign-born citizens, who were significantly less likely to report. Asian non-citizens, conversely, were nearly ten times more likely to use victim services than White citizens. Weapon involvement was linked to higher odds of police reporting, while incident severity was associated with greater service use. Series-victimization was associated with lower odds of police reporting, but higher odds of service use. These results challenge the prevailing assumption that racial and ethnic minorities are uniformly less likely to seek help and suggest that targeted public policy solutions can effectively promote help-seeking, especially among immigrant populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When insignificance is significant: Rethinking race, immigration, and the myth of victim reluctance to report to police and use victim services\",\"authors\":\"Hyunjung Shim,&nbsp;Sarayu Cheemalapati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Public discourse often portrays victims of racial, ethnic, or immigrant minorities as more reluctant to engage in police or seek further help. Yet, this perception remains largely unexamined through empirical research. This study tests the correlates of police notification and victim service utilization among victims of violence, with particular focus on how race/ethnicity and immigration status—key components of sociostructural positioning—interact. Drawing on the Multilevel, Contextualized Help-Seeking Model, we analyzed data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) from 2017 to 2023. We estimate multilevel logistic models of police reporting and service use, while accounting for selection bias in the victim sample. Findings reveal that Black victims generally had higher odds of notifying police than White victims. However, this trend reverses for Black foreign-born citizens, who were significantly less likely to report. Asian non-citizens, conversely, were nearly ten times more likely to use victim services than White citizens. Weapon involvement was linked to higher odds of police reporting, while incident severity was associated with greater service use. Series-victimization was associated with lower odds of police reporting, but higher odds of service use. These results challenge the prevailing assumption that racial and ethnic minorities are uniformly less likely to seek help and suggest that targeted public policy solutions can effectively promote help-seeking, especially among immigrant populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001606\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共话语经常将少数种族、族裔或移民的受害者描绘成更不愿意与警察接触或寻求进一步帮助的人。然而,这种看法在很大程度上仍未经实证研究检验。本研究测试了暴力受害者中警察通知和受害者服务利用之间的相关性,特别关注种族/民族和移民身份(社会结构定位的关键组成部分)如何相互作用。利用多层次情境化求助模型,我们分析了2017年至2023年国家犯罪受害调查(NCVS)的数据。我们估计了警察报告和服务使用的多层次逻辑模型,同时考虑了受害者样本中的选择偏差。调查结果显示,黑人受害者通常比白人受害者报告警察的几率更高。然而,在外国出生的黑人公民中,这一趋势正好相反,他们报告的可能性要低得多。相反,亚裔非公民使用受害者服务的可能性几乎是白人公民的10倍。使用武器与警察报告的几率较高有关,而事件严重程度与更多的服务使用有关。系列受害与警察报告的几率较低有关,但与服务使用的几率较高有关。这些结果挑战了普遍的假设,即种族和少数民族都不太可能寻求帮助,并表明有针对性的公共政策解决方案可以有效地促进寻求帮助,特别是在移民人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When insignificance is significant: Rethinking race, immigration, and the myth of victim reluctance to report to police and use victim services
Public discourse often portrays victims of racial, ethnic, or immigrant minorities as more reluctant to engage in police or seek further help. Yet, this perception remains largely unexamined through empirical research. This study tests the correlates of police notification and victim service utilization among victims of violence, with particular focus on how race/ethnicity and immigration status—key components of sociostructural positioning—interact. Drawing on the Multilevel, Contextualized Help-Seeking Model, we analyzed data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) from 2017 to 2023. We estimate multilevel logistic models of police reporting and service use, while accounting for selection bias in the victim sample. Findings reveal that Black victims generally had higher odds of notifying police than White victims. However, this trend reverses for Black foreign-born citizens, who were significantly less likely to report. Asian non-citizens, conversely, were nearly ten times more likely to use victim services than White citizens. Weapon involvement was linked to higher odds of police reporting, while incident severity was associated with greater service use. Series-victimization was associated with lower odds of police reporting, but higher odds of service use. These results challenge the prevailing assumption that racial and ethnic minorities are uniformly less likely to seek help and suggest that targeted public policy solutions can effectively promote help-seeking, especially among immigrant populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信