{"title":"提高城乡结合部的宜居性:将居民视角融入中国社区公园规划与设计","authors":"Ke Wang , Ian Mell , Somidh Saha","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban-rural fringe areas (URFAs) are transitional zones where rapid urban expansion intersects with rural landscapes, posing significant socio-environmental challenges. In China, this issue is particularly critical, with the urbanisation rate increasing from 17.9 % in 1978 to over 67 % in 2024, driving rapid land use transformation and reshaping the design and functionality of public spaces. Community parks (CPs) play a vital role in these areas in enhancing liveability and socio-ecological resilience. However, while policies increasingly emphasise the importance of green spaces, their quality and alignment with residents’ needs remain underexplored. This study examines the role of CPs in Wuhan’s URFAs by analysing park usage patterns, resident satisfaction, and functional design elements. Using structured questionnaire surveys (n = 452), the findings reveal that: (1) CPs within a 1,000-meter or 15-minute walking radius significantly enhance accessibility and utilisation; (2) resident satisfaction is influenced by infrastructure quality, particularly the availability of toilets, fitness equipment, and well-maintained facilities; and (3) CPs do not meet diverse community needs, highlighting a gap between quantity-based provision and quality-driven usability. This underscores the significance of prioritising functionality, inclusivity, and user-centred design. In response, this study advocates for a shift from a supply “quantity” driven approach towards a “quality” first planning approach, emphasising participatory design and people-centred approaches to optimise CP infrastructure. By providing empirical evidence, this research contributes to the discourse on urban liveability enhancement and offers insights for improving green space planning in rapidly urbanising regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129055"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing liveability in urban-rural fringe areas: Integrating resident perspectives to community park planning and design in China\",\"authors\":\"Ke Wang , Ian Mell , Somidh Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban-rural fringe areas (URFAs) are transitional zones where rapid urban expansion intersects with rural landscapes, posing significant socio-environmental challenges. In China, this issue is particularly critical, with the urbanisation rate increasing from 17.9 % in 1978 to over 67 % in 2024, driving rapid land use transformation and reshaping the design and functionality of public spaces. Community parks (CPs) play a vital role in these areas in enhancing liveability and socio-ecological resilience. However, while policies increasingly emphasise the importance of green spaces, their quality and alignment with residents’ needs remain underexplored. This study examines the role of CPs in Wuhan’s URFAs by analysing park usage patterns, resident satisfaction, and functional design elements. Using structured questionnaire surveys (n = 452), the findings reveal that: (1) CPs within a 1,000-meter or 15-minute walking radius significantly enhance accessibility and utilisation; (2) resident satisfaction is influenced by infrastructure quality, particularly the availability of toilets, fitness equipment, and well-maintained facilities; and (3) CPs do not meet diverse community needs, highlighting a gap between quantity-based provision and quality-driven usability. This underscores the significance of prioritising functionality, inclusivity, and user-centred design. In response, this study advocates for a shift from a supply “quantity” driven approach towards a “quality” first planning approach, emphasising participatory design and people-centred approaches to optimise CP infrastructure. By providing empirical evidence, this research contributes to the discourse on urban liveability enhancement and offers insights for improving green space planning in rapidly urbanising regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003899\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing liveability in urban-rural fringe areas: Integrating resident perspectives to community park planning and design in China
Urban-rural fringe areas (URFAs) are transitional zones where rapid urban expansion intersects with rural landscapes, posing significant socio-environmental challenges. In China, this issue is particularly critical, with the urbanisation rate increasing from 17.9 % in 1978 to over 67 % in 2024, driving rapid land use transformation and reshaping the design and functionality of public spaces. Community parks (CPs) play a vital role in these areas in enhancing liveability and socio-ecological resilience. However, while policies increasingly emphasise the importance of green spaces, their quality and alignment with residents’ needs remain underexplored. This study examines the role of CPs in Wuhan’s URFAs by analysing park usage patterns, resident satisfaction, and functional design elements. Using structured questionnaire surveys (n = 452), the findings reveal that: (1) CPs within a 1,000-meter or 15-minute walking radius significantly enhance accessibility and utilisation; (2) resident satisfaction is influenced by infrastructure quality, particularly the availability of toilets, fitness equipment, and well-maintained facilities; and (3) CPs do not meet diverse community needs, highlighting a gap between quantity-based provision and quality-driven usability. This underscores the significance of prioritising functionality, inclusivity, and user-centred design. In response, this study advocates for a shift from a supply “quantity” driven approach towards a “quality” first planning approach, emphasising participatory design and people-centred approaches to optimise CP infrastructure. By providing empirical evidence, this research contributes to the discourse on urban liveability enhancement and offers insights for improving green space planning in rapidly urbanising regions.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.