利用季节气候模型和长短期记忆网络预测小麦产量

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maximilian Zachow , Stella Ofori-Ampofo , Harald Kunstmann , Rıdvan Salih Kuzu , Xiao Xiang Zhu , Senthold Asseng
{"title":"利用季节气候模型和长短期记忆网络预测小麦产量","authors":"Maximilian Zachow ,&nbsp;Stella Ofori-Ampofo ,&nbsp;Harald Kunstmann ,&nbsp;Rıdvan Salih Kuzu ,&nbsp;Xiao Xiang Zhu ,&nbsp;Senthold Asseng","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The potential of seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) within machine learning models to forecast crop yields remains unexplored. We propose a workflow for integrating SCF data into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to forecast wheat yield at the county level across the Great Plains in the United States. Each month, past predictors were filled with observations and future weather predictors were forecasted using the seasonal climate model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (SCF approach). This approach was benchmarked with the truncate approach that only used observed predictors. Using all observed predictors at harvest, the model achieved an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.46, an NRMSE of 0.24, and an MSE of 0.46 t/ha on the test set. The SCF approach and truncate approach performed poorly from January to March. The SCF approach outperformed the truncate approach in April and May. At the beginning of May, three months before harvest, the SCF approach achieved an MSE of 0.6 t/ha, improving the truncate approach by 10 %. In June, the SCF approach further improved but did not outperform the truncate approach. Predictor importance analysis revealed the critical role of SCF data at the beginning of May for the latter half of May. This study suggests that weather forecasts issued at the right time, when both crop development and forecast skill align, could be as short as 16 days and still significantly improve the accuracy of sub-national wheat yield forecasts over other approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 110965"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wheat yield forecasts with seasonal climate models and long short-term memory networks\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Zachow ,&nbsp;Stella Ofori-Ampofo ,&nbsp;Harald Kunstmann ,&nbsp;Rıdvan Salih Kuzu ,&nbsp;Xiao Xiang Zhu ,&nbsp;Senthold Asseng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The potential of seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) within machine learning models to forecast crop yields remains unexplored. We propose a workflow for integrating SCF data into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to forecast wheat yield at the county level across the Great Plains in the United States. Each month, past predictors were filled with observations and future weather predictors were forecasted using the seasonal climate model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (SCF approach). This approach was benchmarked with the truncate approach that only used observed predictors. Using all observed predictors at harvest, the model achieved an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.46, an NRMSE of 0.24, and an MSE of 0.46 t/ha on the test set. The SCF approach and truncate approach performed poorly from January to March. The SCF approach outperformed the truncate approach in April and May. At the beginning of May, three months before harvest, the SCF approach achieved an MSE of 0.6 t/ha, improving the truncate approach by 10 %. In June, the SCF approach further improved but did not outperform the truncate approach. Predictor importance analysis revealed the critical role of SCF data at the beginning of May for the latter half of May. This study suggests that weather forecasts issued at the right time, when both crop development and forecast skill align, could be as short as 16 days and still significantly improve the accuracy of sub-national wheat yield forecasts over other approaches.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925010713\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925010713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

季节性气候预测(SCFs)在机器学习模型中预测作物产量的潜力仍未得到探索。我们提出了一个工作流,将SCF数据整合到一个长短期记忆(LSTM)网络中,以预测美国大平原地区县级的小麦产量。每个月,过去的预测器中都填满了观测结果,未来的天气预测器使用欧洲中期天气预报中心(SCF方法)的季节性气候模式进行预测。该方法与仅使用观察到的预测因子的截断方法进行基准测试。使用收获时观察到的所有预测因子,该模型在测试集上的R2为0.46,NRMSE为0.24,MSE为0.46 t/ha。SCF法和截断法在1 - 3月表现不佳。SCF方法在4月和5月的表现优于截断方法。在5月初,收获前3个月,SCF方法的MSE达到0.6吨/公顷,比截断法提高了10%。6月,SCF方法进一步改进,但没有优于截断方法。预测因子重要性分析揭示了5月初SCF数据对5月下旬的关键作用。这项研究表明,在作物发育和预报技术相结合的适当时间发布的天气预报可能短至16天,但仍然比其他方法显著提高了地方小麦产量预报的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wheat yield forecasts with seasonal climate models and long short-term memory networks
The potential of seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) within machine learning models to forecast crop yields remains unexplored. We propose a workflow for integrating SCF data into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to forecast wheat yield at the county level across the Great Plains in the United States. Each month, past predictors were filled with observations and future weather predictors were forecasted using the seasonal climate model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (SCF approach). This approach was benchmarked with the truncate approach that only used observed predictors. Using all observed predictors at harvest, the model achieved an R2 of 0.46, an NRMSE of 0.24, and an MSE of 0.46 t/ha on the test set. The SCF approach and truncate approach performed poorly from January to March. The SCF approach outperformed the truncate approach in April and May. At the beginning of May, three months before harvest, the SCF approach achieved an MSE of 0.6 t/ha, improving the truncate approach by 10 %. In June, the SCF approach further improved but did not outperform the truncate approach. Predictor importance analysis revealed the critical role of SCF data at the beginning of May for the latter half of May. This study suggests that weather forecasts issued at the right time, when both crop development and forecast skill align, could be as short as 16 days and still significantly improve the accuracy of sub-national wheat yield forecasts over other approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信