{"title":"高性能可编程组合晶格材料","authors":"Jian Zhao , Robert O. Ritchie , Jian Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A long-standing challenge in modern materials design is overcoming inefficient and arbitrary trial-and-error approaches. To tackle this challenge, this study introduces a novel concept of “combinatorial lattices” and establishes a comprehensive performance library to enable systematic, property-driven design. Through a combination of theoretical modeling, finite element simulations, and experimental validation, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in facilitating both anisotropic design and tradeoff design across multiple mechanical properties. The resulting combinatorial lattices achieve stiffness and strength values up to 66.0 % of the Hashin–Shtrikman upper bound and 60.2 % of the Suquet bound, respectively. Notably, the combinatorial lattices exhibit relative strengths approaching—or even exceeding—the empirical upper bounds predicted by the Gibson-Ashby model. The energy absorption per unit volume surpasses that of comparable-density lattices by more than threefold, and the CFE reaches a remarkable 151 %. Beyond superior static performance, the Kelvin+BCC lattice demonstrates exceptional damage tolerance under 5 cyclic loading, retaining 99.5 % of its initial strength and 79.9 % of its initial stiffness after repeated compression at high strain levels. This work provides a programmable mechanomaterial design framework that proactively integrates geometric combinatorics with performance-driven criteria, offering a robust pathway for the development of high-performance lattice structures and advanced materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 106351"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-performance programmable combinatorial lattice materials\",\"authors\":\"Jian Zhao , Robert O. Ritchie , Jian Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A long-standing challenge in modern materials design is overcoming inefficient and arbitrary trial-and-error approaches. To tackle this challenge, this study introduces a novel concept of “combinatorial lattices” and establishes a comprehensive performance library to enable systematic, property-driven design. Through a combination of theoretical modeling, finite element simulations, and experimental validation, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in facilitating both anisotropic design and tradeoff design across multiple mechanical properties. The resulting combinatorial lattices achieve stiffness and strength values up to 66.0 % of the Hashin–Shtrikman upper bound and 60.2 % of the Suquet bound, respectively. Notably, the combinatorial lattices exhibit relative strengths approaching—or even exceeding—the empirical upper bounds predicted by the Gibson-Ashby model. The energy absorption per unit volume surpasses that of comparable-density lattices by more than threefold, and the CFE reaches a remarkable 151 %. Beyond superior static performance, the Kelvin+BCC lattice demonstrates exceptional damage tolerance under 5 cyclic loading, retaining 99.5 % of its initial strength and 79.9 % of its initial stiffness after repeated compression at high strain levels. This work provides a programmable mechanomaterial design framework that proactively integrates geometric combinatorics with performance-driven criteria, offering a robust pathway for the development of high-performance lattice structures and advanced materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509625003254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509625003254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A long-standing challenge in modern materials design is overcoming inefficient and arbitrary trial-and-error approaches. To tackle this challenge, this study introduces a novel concept of “combinatorial lattices” and establishes a comprehensive performance library to enable systematic, property-driven design. Through a combination of theoretical modeling, finite element simulations, and experimental validation, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in facilitating both anisotropic design and tradeoff design across multiple mechanical properties. The resulting combinatorial lattices achieve stiffness and strength values up to 66.0 % of the Hashin–Shtrikman upper bound and 60.2 % of the Suquet bound, respectively. Notably, the combinatorial lattices exhibit relative strengths approaching—or even exceeding—the empirical upper bounds predicted by the Gibson-Ashby model. The energy absorption per unit volume surpasses that of comparable-density lattices by more than threefold, and the CFE reaches a remarkable 151 %. Beyond superior static performance, the Kelvin+BCC lattice demonstrates exceptional damage tolerance under 5 cyclic loading, retaining 99.5 % of its initial strength and 79.9 % of its initial stiffness after repeated compression at high strain levels. This work provides a programmable mechanomaterial design framework that proactively integrates geometric combinatorics with performance-driven criteria, offering a robust pathway for the development of high-performance lattice structures and advanced materials.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics.
The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics.
The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.