使用自我管理的数字认知测试和血液生物标志物对阿尔茨海默病的初级保健检测

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Pontus Tideman, Linda Karlsson, Olof Strandberg, Susanna Calling, Ruben Smith, Patrik Midlöv, Philip B. Verghese, Joel B. Braunstein, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Erik Stomrud, Sebastian Palmqvist, Oskar Hansson
{"title":"使用自我管理的数字认知测试和血液生物标志物对阿尔茨海默病的初级保健检测","authors":"Pontus Tideman, Linda Karlsson, Olof Strandberg, Susanna Calling, Ruben Smith, Patrik Midlöv, Philip B. Verghese, Joel B. Braunstein, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Erik Stomrud, Sebastian Palmqvist, Oskar Hansson","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03965-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>After the clinical implementation of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for people with cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), there is an urgent need to efficiently identify this patient population in primary care. Therefore, we created a brief and self-administered digital cognitive test battery (BioCog). Based on its sub-scores, a logistic regression model was developed in a secondary care cohort (<i>n</i> = 223) and then evaluated in an independent primary care cohort comprising 19 primary care centers (<i>n</i> = 403). In primary care, BioCog had an accuracy of 85% when using a single cutoff to define cognitive impairment, which was significantly better than the assessment of primary care physicians (accuracy 73%). The accuracy increased to 90% when using a two-cutoff approach. BioCog had significantly higher accuracy than standard paper-and-pencil tests (that is, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Cog) and another digital cognitive test. Furthermore, BioCog combined with a blood test could detect clinical, biomarker-verified AD with an accuracy of 90% (one cutoff), significantly better than standard-of-care (accuracy 70%) or when using the blood test alone (accuracy 80%). In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study shows that a brief, self-administered digital cognitive test battery can detect cognitive impairment and, when combined with a blood test, accurately identify clinical AD in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary care detection of Alzheimer’s disease using a self-administered digital cognitive test and blood biomarkers\",\"authors\":\"Pontus Tideman, Linda Karlsson, Olof Strandberg, Susanna Calling, Ruben Smith, Patrik Midlöv, Philip B. Verghese, Joel B. Braunstein, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Erik Stomrud, Sebastian Palmqvist, Oskar Hansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03965-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>After the clinical implementation of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for people with cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), there is an urgent need to efficiently identify this patient population in primary care. Therefore, we created a brief and self-administered digital cognitive test battery (BioCog). Based on its sub-scores, a logistic regression model was developed in a secondary care cohort (<i>n</i> = 223) and then evaluated in an independent primary care cohort comprising 19 primary care centers (<i>n</i> = 403). In primary care, BioCog had an accuracy of 85% when using a single cutoff to define cognitive impairment, which was significantly better than the assessment of primary care physicians (accuracy 73%). The accuracy increased to 90% when using a two-cutoff approach. BioCog had significantly higher accuracy than standard paper-and-pencil tests (that is, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Cog) and another digital cognitive test. Furthermore, BioCog combined with a blood test could detect clinical, biomarker-verified AD with an accuracy of 90% (one cutoff), significantly better than standard-of-care (accuracy 70%) or when using the blood test alone (accuracy 80%). In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study shows that a brief, self-administered digital cognitive test battery can detect cognitive impairment and, when combined with a blood test, accurately identify clinical AD in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03965-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03965-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床实施β淀粉样蛋白靶向治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)认知障碍患者后,迫切需要在初级保健中有效识别这一患者群体。因此,我们创造了一个简短的自我管理的数字认知测试电池(BioCog)。根据其分项得分,在二级保健队列(n = 223)中建立了逻辑回归模型,然后在包括19个初级保健中心(n = 403)的独立初级保健队列中进行评估。在初级保健中,BioCog在使用单一临界值来定义认知障碍时准确率为85%,明显优于初级保健医生的评估(准确率为73%)。当使用双截止方法时,准确率提高到90%。BioCog的准确性明显高于标准的纸笔测试(即Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Cog)和另一种数字认知测试。此外,BioCog结合血液检测可以检测临床生物标志物验证的AD,准确率为90%(一个截止值),明显优于标准护理(准确率70%)或单独使用血液检测(准确率80%)。总之,这项概念验证研究表明,一个简短的、自我管理的数字认知测试电池可以检测认知障碍,并与血液测试相结合,在初级保健中准确识别临床AD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Primary care detection of Alzheimer’s disease using a self-administered digital cognitive test and blood biomarkers

Primary care detection of Alzheimer’s disease using a self-administered digital cognitive test and blood biomarkers

After the clinical implementation of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for people with cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), there is an urgent need to efficiently identify this patient population in primary care. Therefore, we created a brief and self-administered digital cognitive test battery (BioCog). Based on its sub-scores, a logistic regression model was developed in a secondary care cohort (n = 223) and then evaluated in an independent primary care cohort comprising 19 primary care centers (n = 403). In primary care, BioCog had an accuracy of 85% when using a single cutoff to define cognitive impairment, which was significantly better than the assessment of primary care physicians (accuracy 73%). The accuracy increased to 90% when using a two-cutoff approach. BioCog had significantly higher accuracy than standard paper-and-pencil tests (that is, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Cog) and another digital cognitive test. Furthermore, BioCog combined with a blood test could detect clinical, biomarker-verified AD with an accuracy of 90% (one cutoff), significantly better than standard-of-care (accuracy 70%) or when using the blood test alone (accuracy 80%). In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study shows that a brief, self-administered digital cognitive test battery can detect cognitive impairment and, when combined with a blood test, accurately identify clinical AD in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信