地理位置衍生的活动指数与严重精神疾病的临床症状和功能的关联:一项多变量荟萃分析

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Tess F Filip,Sarah Akhras,Gerhard S Hellemann,Ti Hsu,Amanda McCleery
{"title":"地理位置衍生的活动指数与严重精神疾病的临床症状和功能的关联:一项多变量荟萃分析","authors":"Tess F Filip,Sarah Akhras,Gerhard S Hellemann,Ti Hsu,Amanda McCleery","doi":"10.1037/abn0001037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geolocation-derived mobility indices from smartphone sensors may be a digital phenotype of negative symptoms in severe mental illness (SMI; schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). In this preliminary analysis, we compared SMI and healthy comparators (HC) on five geolocation indices (time at home, distances traveled, distances traveled from home, normalized entropy, and number of locations visited) and tested associations with clinical and functional outcomes. A systematic search identified eight eligible samples (k; n = 153 effects, nSMI = 291, nHC = 162 across all analyses). Effect sizes included Hedge's g for group differences and Pearson's r for correlations with symptoms and functioning. Multivariate mixed-effects models derived overall effect sizes. Compared to HC, significant reductions were observed in SMI for overall mobility (g = -0.45, k = 6), time at home (g = -0.62, k = 4), distances from home (g = -0.61, k = 2), and locations visited (g = -0.47, k = 5). Within SMI, overall mobility (r = -.19, k = 5), time at home (r = -.24, k = 3), and normalized entropy (r = -.29, k = 1) were associated with broadly defined negative symptom burden. Associations with functional outcomes were not significant (rs ≤ |.20|, ks ≤ 3). Mobility within activity space was moderately diminished in SMI. Indices reflecting restricted activity space and location variability were modestly associated with negative symptoms in SMI. Geolocation indices alone provide weak symptom monitoring information, although the paucity of studies limits the robustness and generalizability of these preliminary findings. Recommendations are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geolocation-derived mobility indices and the association with clinical symptoms and functioning in severe mental illness: A multivariate meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tess F Filip,Sarah Akhras,Gerhard S Hellemann,Ti Hsu,Amanda McCleery\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0001037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geolocation-derived mobility indices from smartphone sensors may be a digital phenotype of negative symptoms in severe mental illness (SMI; schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). In this preliminary analysis, we compared SMI and healthy comparators (HC) on five geolocation indices (time at home, distances traveled, distances traveled from home, normalized entropy, and number of locations visited) and tested associations with clinical and functional outcomes. A systematic search identified eight eligible samples (k; n = 153 effects, nSMI = 291, nHC = 162 across all analyses). Effect sizes included Hedge's g for group differences and Pearson's r for correlations with symptoms and functioning. Multivariate mixed-effects models derived overall effect sizes. Compared to HC, significant reductions were observed in SMI for overall mobility (g = -0.45, k = 6), time at home (g = -0.62, k = 4), distances from home (g = -0.61, k = 2), and locations visited (g = -0.47, k = 5). Within SMI, overall mobility (r = -.19, k = 5), time at home (r = -.24, k = 3), and normalized entropy (r = -.29, k = 1) were associated with broadly defined negative symptom burden. Associations with functional outcomes were not significant (rs ≤ |.20|, ks ≤ 3). Mobility within activity space was moderately diminished in SMI. Indices reflecting restricted activity space and location variability were modestly associated with negative symptoms in SMI. Geolocation indices alone provide weak symptom monitoring information, although the paucity of studies limits the robustness and generalizability of these preliminary findings. Recommendations are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自智能手机传感器的地理位置衍生的活动指数可能是严重精神疾病(重度精神分裂症、精神分裂症和双相情感障碍)阴性症状的数字表型。在这项初步分析中,我们比较了SMI和健康比较者(HC)在五个地理位置指数(在家时间、旅行距离、离家距离、归一化熵和访问地点数量)上的差异,并测试了与临床和功能结果的关联。系统搜索确定了8个符合条件的样本(k; n = 153个效应,nSMI = 291, nHC = 162)。效应量包括表示组差异的Hedge’s g和表示症状和功能相关性的Pearson’s r。多元混合效应模型推导出总体效应大小。与HC相比,重度精神分裂症患者的整体活动能力(g = -0.45, k = 6)、在家时间(g = -0.62, k = 4)、离家距离(g = -0.61, k = 2)和就诊地点(g = -0.47, k = 5)显著降低。在重度精神障碍患者中,总体活动能力(r = - 0.19, k = 5)、在家时间(r = - 0.24, k = 3)和归一化熵(r = - 0.29, k = 1)与广义的阴性症状负担相关。与功能结局的相关性不显著(rs≤|)。20|, ks≤3)。重度精神分裂症患者活动空间内的活动能力中度减弱。反映受限活动空间和位置可变性的指数与重度精神障碍患者的阴性症状有中度相关性。虽然研究的缺乏限制了这些初步发现的稳健性和普遍性,但单独的地理定位指数提供的症状监测信息很弱。讨论了建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geolocation-derived mobility indices and the association with clinical symptoms and functioning in severe mental illness: A multivariate meta-analysis.
Geolocation-derived mobility indices from smartphone sensors may be a digital phenotype of negative symptoms in severe mental illness (SMI; schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). In this preliminary analysis, we compared SMI and healthy comparators (HC) on five geolocation indices (time at home, distances traveled, distances traveled from home, normalized entropy, and number of locations visited) and tested associations with clinical and functional outcomes. A systematic search identified eight eligible samples (k; n = 153 effects, nSMI = 291, nHC = 162 across all analyses). Effect sizes included Hedge's g for group differences and Pearson's r for correlations with symptoms and functioning. Multivariate mixed-effects models derived overall effect sizes. Compared to HC, significant reductions were observed in SMI for overall mobility (g = -0.45, k = 6), time at home (g = -0.62, k = 4), distances from home (g = -0.61, k = 2), and locations visited (g = -0.47, k = 5). Within SMI, overall mobility (r = -.19, k = 5), time at home (r = -.24, k = 3), and normalized entropy (r = -.29, k = 1) were associated with broadly defined negative symptom burden. Associations with functional outcomes were not significant (rs ≤ |.20|, ks ≤ 3). Mobility within activity space was moderately diminished in SMI. Indices reflecting restricted activity space and location variability were modestly associated with negative symptoms in SMI. Geolocation indices alone provide weak symptom monitoring information, although the paucity of studies limits the robustness and generalizability of these preliminary findings. Recommendations are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信