Maya K Vadiveloo, Alison Tovar, Emily G Elenio, Carsten Eickhoff, John San Soucie, Sarah Feldstein Ewing, Kim M Gans, Anne N Thorndike
{"title":"探索心血管风险在线购物者个性化饮食激励的促进因素和障碍，并为自动化购物平台提供关键信息。","authors":"Maya K Vadiveloo, Alison Tovar, Emily G Elenio, Carsten Eickhoff, John San Soucie, Sarah Feldstein Ewing, Kim M Gans, Anne N Thorndike","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify preferences, facilitators, and barriers to healthy eating and using a personalized diet application (Smart Cart 2.0) for online grocery shopping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Convergent, parallel multimethods study among shoppers (aged > 18 years, grocery shopped online with obesity [body mass index, 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] or hypertension, n=20) and public health professional key informants (n = 11). Online surveys (shoppers only) and in-depth interviews using mock-up application images queried preferences, facilitators, and barriers. We synthesized quantitative and qualitative data for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common barriers (25%) were money and time, while health motivated most food purchases (55%). Four themes emerged from interviews: (1) consuming healthy foods was hard, (2) healthy meal planning would be easier with a one-stop shopping tool, (3) the application addressed shoppers' needs, and (4) some additions could promote application sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Smart Cart 2.0 addressed healthy eating barriers. Integrating feedback will enhance application design for future evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Facilitators and Barriers for Personalized Dietary Incentives Among Online Shoppers at Cardiovascular Risk and Key Informants to Inform an Automated Shopping Platform.\",\"authors\":\"Maya K Vadiveloo, Alison Tovar, Emily G Elenio, Carsten Eickhoff, John San Soucie, Sarah Feldstein Ewing, Kim M Gans, Anne N Thorndike\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify preferences, facilitators, and barriers to healthy eating and using a personalized diet application (Smart Cart 2.0) for online grocery shopping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Convergent, parallel multimethods study among shoppers (aged > 18 years, grocery shopped online with obesity [body mass index, 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] or hypertension, n=20) and public health professional key informants (n = 11). Online surveys (shoppers only) and in-depth interviews using mock-up application images queried preferences, facilitators, and barriers. We synthesized quantitative and qualitative data for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common barriers (25%) were money and time, while health motivated most food purchases (55%). Four themes emerged from interviews: (1) consuming healthy foods was hard, (2) healthy meal planning would be easier with a one-stop shopping tool, (3) the application addressed shoppers' needs, and (4) some additions could promote application sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Smart Cart 2.0 addressed healthy eating barriers. Integrating feedback will enhance application design for future evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring Facilitators and Barriers for Personalized Dietary Incentives Among Online Shoppers at Cardiovascular Risk and Key Informants to Inform an Automated Shopping Platform.
Objective: To identify preferences, facilitators, and barriers to healthy eating and using a personalized diet application (Smart Cart 2.0) for online grocery shopping.
Methods: Convergent, parallel multimethods study among shoppers (aged > 18 years, grocery shopped online with obesity [body mass index, 30 kg/m2] or hypertension, n=20) and public health professional key informants (n = 11). Online surveys (shoppers only) and in-depth interviews using mock-up application images queried preferences, facilitators, and barriers. We synthesized quantitative and qualitative data for thematic analysis.
Results: The most common barriers (25%) were money and time, while health motivated most food purchases (55%). Four themes emerged from interviews: (1) consuming healthy foods was hard, (2) healthy meal planning would be easier with a one-stop shopping tool, (3) the application addressed shoppers' needs, and (4) some additions could promote application sustainability.
Conclusions and implications: Smart Cart 2.0 addressed healthy eating barriers. Integrating feedback will enhance application design for future evaluation.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
