三种下颌固定固位器制作方法的生存率比较:一项随机临床试验。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ama Johal, Kieran Daly, Dylan Murray
{"title":"三种下颌固定固位器制作方法的生存率比较:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Ama Johal, Kieran Daly, Dylan Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this prospective trial was to compare the 2-year survival of bonded mandibular lingual retainers, using 3 different fabrication methods, as well as comparing a range of clinical and patient-centered outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial based in a specialist orthodontic practice setting between November 2017 and December 2021. A total of 300 participants, aged 14 and 18 years, who had completed a course of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment, were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 mandibular fixed retainer fabrication intervention groups: chairside-fabricated and directly bonded Ortho FlexTech; laboratory-fabricated and indirectly bonded multistranded gold-plated wire; and laboratory-fabricated and directly bonded Blu-Elgiloy wire. The primary outcome measure was the 2-year survival of retainers, and secondary outcomes included the clinical efficiency and effectiveness of the 3 methods, along with patient-reported outcomes. An electronic block randomization program was used along with opaque envelopes to conceal allocation. All data were anonymized and assessed blind, using descriptive statistics, and analyzed to detect between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in bonded wire survival between the 3 groups. Survival at 2 years was estimated to be 68% in the multistrand group, and >90% in the other 2 groups. As there was an overall difference in survival between the 3 groups, additional comparisons were made between each pair of groups. The results suggested statistically significant differences between both the Direct Ortho Flex and BlueElgiloy groups with the multistrand group (Bonferroni-adjusted P <0.001). Highly significant (P <0.001) differences were detected in the mean (standard deviation) combined fabrication and clinical time (seconds) between the direct Ortho FlexTech (733 [SD, 122]) and the other 2 indirect methods of multistranded retainer (2948 [SD, 409]) and the Blu-Elgiloy group (2522 [SD, 436]). No significant differences were detected in the alignment of the mandibular anterior teeth, periodontal parameters, or patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 24 months, significant differences were observed in bonded wire survival between the 3 groups. The direct Ortho FlexTech means that combined fabrication and clinical time was 3 times faster than the other 2 indirect methods. No significant differences were detected in the alignment of the mandibular anterior teeth, periodontal parameters, or patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of survival rates using 3 methods of mandibular fixed retainer fabrication: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ama Johal, Kieran Daly, Dylan Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this prospective trial was to compare the 2-year survival of bonded mandibular lingual retainers, using 3 different fabrication methods, as well as comparing a range of clinical and patient-centered outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial based in a specialist orthodontic practice setting between November 2017 and December 2021. A total of 300 participants, aged 14 and 18 years, who had completed a course of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment, were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 mandibular fixed retainer fabrication intervention groups: chairside-fabricated and directly bonded Ortho FlexTech; laboratory-fabricated and indirectly bonded multistranded gold-plated wire; and laboratory-fabricated and directly bonded Blu-Elgiloy wire. The primary outcome measure was the 2-year survival of retainers, and secondary outcomes included the clinical efficiency and effectiveness of the 3 methods, along with patient-reported outcomes. An electronic block randomization program was used along with opaque envelopes to conceal allocation. All data were anonymized and assessed blind, using descriptive statistics, and analyzed to detect between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in bonded wire survival between the 3 groups. Survival at 2 years was estimated to be 68% in the multistrand group, and >90% in the other 2 groups. As there was an overall difference in survival between the 3 groups, additional comparisons were made between each pair of groups. The results suggested statistically significant differences between both the Direct Ortho Flex and BlueElgiloy groups with the multistrand group (Bonferroni-adjusted P <0.001). Highly significant (P <0.001) differences were detected in the mean (standard deviation) combined fabrication and clinical time (seconds) between the direct Ortho FlexTech (733 [SD, 122]) and the other 2 indirect methods of multistranded retainer (2948 [SD, 409]) and the Blu-Elgiloy group (2522 [SD, 436]). No significant differences were detected in the alignment of the mandibular anterior teeth, periodontal parameters, or patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 24 months, significant differences were observed in bonded wire survival between the 3 groups. The direct Ortho FlexTech means that combined fabrication and clinical time was 3 times faster than the other 2 indirect methods. No significant differences were detected in the alignment of the mandibular anterior teeth, periodontal parameters, or patient-reported outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:这项前瞻性试验的目的是比较使用3种不同制作方法的下颌舌固定器的2年生存率,并比较一系列临床和以患者为中心的结果。方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机临床试验,于2017年11月至2021年12月在一家专科正畸诊所进行。300名年龄在14岁至18岁之间完成了一个疗程的综合固定矫治器治疗的参与者被随机分配到3个下颌固定固位器制造干预组中的1个:椅式制造和直接结合Ortho FlexTech;实验室制作和间接焊接的多股镀金线;以及实验室制造和直接粘合的蓝elgiloy线。主要指标是固位器的2年生存率,次要指标包括3种方法的临床效率和有效性,以及患者报告的结果。使用电子块随机化程序以及不透明信封来隐藏分配。所有数据均匿名、盲评估,采用描述性统计,并进行分析以检测组间差异。结果:三组间结合丝存活率差异有统计学意义。据估计,多链组2年生存率为68%,其他两组为90%。由于三组之间的总体存活率存在差异,因此在每对组之间进行了额外的比较。结果显示,Direct Ortho Flex组和BlueElgiloy组与多股组之间存在统计学差异(bonferroni校正P)。结论:在24个月时,3组间的粘结丝存活率存在显著差异。直接Ortho FlexTech意味着制造和临床时间比其他两种间接方法快3倍。在下颌前牙的排列、牙周参数或患者报告的结果方面没有发现显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of survival rates using 3 methods of mandibular fixed retainer fabrication: A randomized clinical trial.

Introduction: The objective of this prospective trial was to compare the 2-year survival of bonded mandibular lingual retainers, using 3 different fabrication methods, as well as comparing a range of clinical and patient-centered outcomes.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial based in a specialist orthodontic practice setting between November 2017 and December 2021. A total of 300 participants, aged 14 and 18 years, who had completed a course of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment, were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 mandibular fixed retainer fabrication intervention groups: chairside-fabricated and directly bonded Ortho FlexTech; laboratory-fabricated and indirectly bonded multistranded gold-plated wire; and laboratory-fabricated and directly bonded Blu-Elgiloy wire. The primary outcome measure was the 2-year survival of retainers, and secondary outcomes included the clinical efficiency and effectiveness of the 3 methods, along with patient-reported outcomes. An electronic block randomization program was used along with opaque envelopes to conceal allocation. All data were anonymized and assessed blind, using descriptive statistics, and analyzed to detect between-group differences.

Results: There was a significant difference in bonded wire survival between the 3 groups. Survival at 2 years was estimated to be 68% in the multistrand group, and >90% in the other 2 groups. As there was an overall difference in survival between the 3 groups, additional comparisons were made between each pair of groups. The results suggested statistically significant differences between both the Direct Ortho Flex and BlueElgiloy groups with the multistrand group (Bonferroni-adjusted P <0.001). Highly significant (P <0.001) differences were detected in the mean (standard deviation) combined fabrication and clinical time (seconds) between the direct Ortho FlexTech (733 [SD, 122]) and the other 2 indirect methods of multistranded retainer (2948 [SD, 409]) and the Blu-Elgiloy group (2522 [SD, 436]). No significant differences were detected in the alignment of the mandibular anterior teeth, periodontal parameters, or patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions: At 24 months, significant differences were observed in bonded wire survival between the 3 groups. The direct Ortho FlexTech means that combined fabrication and clinical time was 3 times faster than the other 2 indirect methods. No significant differences were detected in the alignment of the mandibular anterior teeth, periodontal parameters, or patient-reported outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信