你只与你所知道的工作:医疗保健提供者使用非药物干预管理青少年镰状细胞危象痛的经验。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bukola Mary Ibitoye , Bernie Garrett , Manon Ranger , Jennifer N. Stinson
{"title":"你只与你所知道的工作:医疗保健提供者使用非药物干预管理青少年镰状细胞危象痛的经验。","authors":"Bukola Mary Ibitoye ,&nbsp;Bernie Garrett ,&nbsp;Manon Ranger ,&nbsp;Jennifer N. Stinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sickle cell crises are the leading reason for hospitalization in adolescents with sickle cell disease. Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for sickle cell crisis pain management in high and low-resource settings. Preliminary evidence suggests high use of non-pharmacological interventions among adolescents with sickle cell disease in home settings in Nigeria, including potentially harmful ones, and limited use in hospitals, possibly due to healthcare providers’ reluctance to use them. Using an interpretive description design, this study explored healthcare providers’ perceptions of non-pharmacological interventions and their experience using and recommending these interventions for managing sickle cell crisis pain in adolescents in Nigeria. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using constant comparison analysis. Fourteen healthcare providers were recruited from healthcare settings across Nigeria. Five broad themes were identified: 1) Perceptions, 2) Safety and risks of non-pharmacological interventions, 3) Recommended non-pharmacological interventions, 4) Influencing factors, and 5) Non-pharmacological intervention education. Some providers held misconceptions about non-pharmacological interventions, such as believing they were only effective for patients faking pain. These interventions may be recommended for pain management, depending on the provider. The use of questionable interventions, like herbal concoctions, poses a significant health challenge with serious consequences, including death. Identified barriers to the implementation of non-pharmacological interventions include providers’ inadequate knowledge about these interventions. The patients’ desire to use safe, effective interventions should be supported. Developing contextually relevant educational resources on these interventions might equip providers to support their use during hospitalization, potentially improving their pain outcomes and limiting the use of harmful interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This article presents a qualitative summary of the experiences of healthcare providers in recommending and using non-pharmacological interventions for pain management. This information can guide clinicians and researchers interested in developing educational resources on how these interventions are used, providers’ educational needs in Nigeria and dissemination avenues for these resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 105551"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You only work with what you know: Healthcare providers’ experiences using non-pharmacological interventions in managing sickle cell crisis pain in adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Bukola Mary Ibitoye ,&nbsp;Bernie Garrett ,&nbsp;Manon Ranger ,&nbsp;Jennifer N. Stinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sickle cell crises are the leading reason for hospitalization in adolescents with sickle cell disease. Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for sickle cell crisis pain management in high and low-resource settings. Preliminary evidence suggests high use of non-pharmacological interventions among adolescents with sickle cell disease in home settings in Nigeria, including potentially harmful ones, and limited use in hospitals, possibly due to healthcare providers’ reluctance to use them. Using an interpretive description design, this study explored healthcare providers’ perceptions of non-pharmacological interventions and their experience using and recommending these interventions for managing sickle cell crisis pain in adolescents in Nigeria. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using constant comparison analysis. Fourteen healthcare providers were recruited from healthcare settings across Nigeria. Five broad themes were identified: 1) Perceptions, 2) Safety and risks of non-pharmacological interventions, 3) Recommended non-pharmacological interventions, 4) Influencing factors, and 5) Non-pharmacological intervention education. Some providers held misconceptions about non-pharmacological interventions, such as believing they were only effective for patients faking pain. These interventions may be recommended for pain management, depending on the provider. The use of questionable interventions, like herbal concoctions, poses a significant health challenge with serious consequences, including death. Identified barriers to the implementation of non-pharmacological interventions include providers’ inadequate knowledge about these interventions. The patients’ desire to use safe, effective interventions should be supported. Developing contextually relevant educational resources on these interventions might equip providers to support their use during hospitalization, potentially improving their pain outcomes and limiting the use of harmful interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This article presents a qualitative summary of the experiences of healthcare providers in recommending and using non-pharmacological interventions for pain management. This information can guide clinicians and researchers interested in developing educational resources on how these interventions are used, providers’ educational needs in Nigeria and dissemination avenues for these resources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007783\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

镰状细胞危像是青少年镰状细胞病住院治疗的主要原因。非药物干预建议镰状细胞危象疼痛管理在高和低资源设置。初步证据表明,尼日利亚患有镰状细胞病的青少年在家庭环境中大量使用非药物干预措施,包括可能有害的干预措施,而在医院的使用有限,可能是由于卫生保健提供者不愿使用这些措施。采用解释性描述设计,本研究探讨了医疗保健提供者对非药物干预的看法,以及他们使用和推荐这些干预措施来管理尼日利亚青少年镰状细胞危象痛的经验。进行了个别的半结构化访谈。数据分析采用常值比较分析法。从尼日利亚各地的医疗保健机构招募了14名医疗保健提供者。确定了五大主题:1)认知,2)非药物干预的安全性和风险,3)推荐的非药物干预,4)影响因素,5)非药物干预教育。一些提供者对非药物干预存在误解,例如认为它们只对假装疼痛的患者有效。非药物干预可能会被推荐用于疼痛管理,这取决于提供者。使用有问题的干预措施,如草药混合物,对健康构成重大挑战,造成严重后果,包括死亡。已确定的实施非药物干预措施的障碍包括提供者对这些干预措施的知识不足。应支持患者使用安全、有效干预措施的愿望。开发与这些干预措施相关的教育资源可能使提供者能够支持在住院期间使用这些干预措施,从而可能改善其疼痛结果并限制有害干预措施的使用。观点:这篇文章提出了医疗服务提供者在推荐和使用非药物干预疼痛管理经验的定性总结。这些信息可以指导有兴趣开发教育资源的临床医生和研究人员了解如何使用这些干预措施、尼日利亚提供者的教育需求以及这些资源的传播途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
You only work with what you know: Healthcare providers’ experiences using non-pharmacological interventions in managing sickle cell crisis pain in adolescents
Sickle cell crises are the leading reason for hospitalization in adolescents with sickle cell disease. Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for sickle cell crisis pain management in high and low-resource settings. Preliminary evidence suggests high use of non-pharmacological interventions among adolescents with sickle cell disease in home settings in Nigeria, including potentially harmful ones, and limited use in hospitals, possibly due to healthcare providers’ reluctance to use them. Using an interpretive description design, this study explored healthcare providers’ perceptions of non-pharmacological interventions and their experience using and recommending these interventions for managing sickle cell crisis pain in adolescents in Nigeria. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using constant comparison analysis. Fourteen healthcare providers were recruited from healthcare settings across Nigeria. Five broad themes were identified: 1) Perceptions, 2) Safety and risks of non-pharmacological interventions, 3) Recommended non-pharmacological interventions, 4) Influencing factors, and 5) Non-pharmacological intervention education. Some providers held misconceptions about non-pharmacological interventions, such as believing they were only effective for patients faking pain. These interventions may be recommended for pain management, depending on the provider. The use of questionable interventions, like herbal concoctions, poses a significant health challenge with serious consequences, including death. Identified barriers to the implementation of non-pharmacological interventions include providers’ inadequate knowledge about these interventions. The patients’ desire to use safe, effective interventions should be supported. Developing contextually relevant educational resources on these interventions might equip providers to support their use during hospitalization, potentially improving their pain outcomes and limiting the use of harmful interventions.

Perspective

This article presents a qualitative summary of the experiences of healthcare providers in recommending and using non-pharmacological interventions for pain management. This information can guide clinicians and researchers interested in developing educational resources on how these interventions are used, providers’ educational needs in Nigeria and dissemination avenues for these resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信