社会人口学、临床和干预特征对单次音乐治疗疼痛强度的影响。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Samuel N. Rodgers-Melnick , Douglas Gunzler , Thomas E. Love , Siran M. Koroukian , Mark Beno , Jeffery A. Dusek , Johnie Rose
{"title":"社会人口学、临床和干预特征对单次音乐治疗疼痛强度的影响。","authors":"Samuel N. Rodgers-Melnick ,&nbsp;Douglas Gunzler ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Love ,&nbsp;Siran M. Koroukian ,&nbsp;Mark Beno ,&nbsp;Jeffery A. Dusek ,&nbsp;Johnie Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several studies support the efficacy of music therapy (MT) for reducing pain, but few have examined which interventions are most effective or which patients are more likely to respond. This study investigated which sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics are associated with clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single MT session. We conducted a retrospective review of 2039 MT sessions provided across a large health system among 1203 adult patients reporting pre-session pain ≥4/10, a complete post-session pain score, and a complete pre-session stress score. We employed a multivariable logistic mixed effects model to evaluate binary pain reduction response (≥2 units vs. &lt; 2 units) where patients were considered nested within therapists. The model included a fixed covariate for MT intervention type: receptive only, recreative (i.e., singing or active instrument play), compositional/creative (e.g., songwriting), or music-assisted relaxation and imagery (MARI). Covariates in the model associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% CI]) included (1) recreative (1.37 [1.00, 1.86]) and MARI (1.48 [1.01, 2.17]) MT interventions as compared to receptive; (2) 15-minute increases in session length (1.40 [1.22, 1.61]); (3) 1-unit increases in pre-session pain (1.19 [1.11, 1.28]), (4) 5-unit increases in Elixhauser comorbidity count (1.29 [1.05, 1.60); and (5) a documented MT session goal of pain management (3.58, [2.64, 4.86]). MT interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain intensity than interventions only involving live or recorded music among patients with high pre-session pain.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This study examined factors associated with meaningful reductions in pain (0–10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single music therapy session. Among hospitalized patients, interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain than interventions only involving live or recorded music.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 105556"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics on pain intensity within a single music therapy session\",\"authors\":\"Samuel N. Rodgers-Melnick ,&nbsp;Douglas Gunzler ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Love ,&nbsp;Siran M. Koroukian ,&nbsp;Mark Beno ,&nbsp;Jeffery A. Dusek ,&nbsp;Johnie Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Several studies support the efficacy of music therapy (MT) for reducing pain, but few have examined which interventions are most effective or which patients are more likely to respond. This study investigated which sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics are associated with clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single MT session. We conducted a retrospective review of 2039 MT sessions provided across a large health system among 1203 adult patients reporting pre-session pain ≥4/10, a complete post-session pain score, and a complete pre-session stress score. We employed a multivariable logistic mixed effects model to evaluate binary pain reduction response (≥2 units vs. &lt; 2 units) where patients were considered nested within therapists. The model included a fixed covariate for MT intervention type: receptive only, recreative (i.e., singing or active instrument play), compositional/creative (e.g., songwriting), or music-assisted relaxation and imagery (MARI). Covariates in the model associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% CI]) included (1) recreative (1.37 [1.00, 1.86]) and MARI (1.48 [1.01, 2.17]) MT interventions as compared to receptive; (2) 15-minute increases in session length (1.40 [1.22, 1.61]); (3) 1-unit increases in pre-session pain (1.19 [1.11, 1.28]), (4) 5-unit increases in Elixhauser comorbidity count (1.29 [1.05, 1.60); and (5) a documented MT session goal of pain management (3.58, [2.64, 4.86]). MT interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain intensity than interventions only involving live or recorded music among patients with high pre-session pain.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This study examined factors associated with meaningful reductions in pain (0–10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single music therapy session. Among hospitalized patients, interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain than interventions only involving live or recorded music.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些研究支持音乐疗法(MT)减轻疼痛的功效,但很少有人研究哪种干预措施最有效,或者哪种患者更有可能做出反应。本研究调查了在单次MT治疗中,哪些社会人口学、临床和干预特征与临床显著的疼痛强度减轻(0-10数值评定量表减轻≥2个单位)有关。我们对大型卫生系统中1203名成年患者的2039次MT治疗进行了回顾性研究,这些患者报告了治疗前疼痛≥4/10,治疗后疼痛评分和治疗前压力评分。我们采用多变量logistic混合效应模型来评估二元疼痛减轻反应(≥2个单位vs < 2个单位),其中患者被认为嵌套在治疗师中。该模型包括MT干预类型的固定协变量:仅接受性,娱乐性(即唱歌或主动乐器演奏),作曲/创造性(例如歌曲创作)或音乐辅助放松和想象(MARI)。模型中与较高校正优势比(aOR [95% CI])相关的协变量包括:(1)与接受性MT干预相比,娱乐性MT干预(1.37[1.00,1.86])和MARI干预(1.48 [1.01,2.17]);(2)会话时长增加15分钟(1.40 [1.22,1.61]);(3)会诊前疼痛增加1个单位(1.19 [1.11,1.28]);(4)Elixhauser共病增加5个单位(1.29 [1.05,1.60]);(5)记录在案的MT会话疼痛管理目标(3.58,[2.64,4.86])。MT干预包括唱歌、积极的乐器演奏和放松/想象,可能比只涉及现场或录制音乐的干预更有效地减轻疼痛强度。观点:本研究考察了在单次音乐治疗中与有意义的疼痛减轻(0-10数值评定量表减轻≥2个单位)相关的因素。在住院患者中,包括唱歌、积极乐器演奏和放松/想象在内的干预措施可能比仅涉及现场或录制音乐的干预措施更有效地减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics on pain intensity within a single music therapy session
Several studies support the efficacy of music therapy (MT) for reducing pain, but few have examined which interventions are most effective or which patients are more likely to respond. This study investigated which sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics are associated with clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single MT session. We conducted a retrospective review of 2039 MT sessions provided across a large health system among 1203 adult patients reporting pre-session pain ≥4/10, a complete post-session pain score, and a complete pre-session stress score. We employed a multivariable logistic mixed effects model to evaluate binary pain reduction response (≥2 units vs. < 2 units) where patients were considered nested within therapists. The model included a fixed covariate for MT intervention type: receptive only, recreative (i.e., singing or active instrument play), compositional/creative (e.g., songwriting), or music-assisted relaxation and imagery (MARI). Covariates in the model associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR [95% CI]) included (1) recreative (1.37 [1.00, 1.86]) and MARI (1.48 [1.01, 2.17]) MT interventions as compared to receptive; (2) 15-minute increases in session length (1.40 [1.22, 1.61]); (3) 1-unit increases in pre-session pain (1.19 [1.11, 1.28]), (4) 5-unit increases in Elixhauser comorbidity count (1.29 [1.05, 1.60); and (5) a documented MT session goal of pain management (3.58, [2.64, 4.86]). MT interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain intensity than interventions only involving live or recorded music among patients with high pre-session pain.

Perspective

This study examined factors associated with meaningful reductions in pain (0–10 numeric rating scale reduction ≥2 units) within a single music therapy session. Among hospitalized patients, interventions involving singing, active instrument play, and relaxation/imagery may be more effective for reducing pain than interventions only involving live or recorded music.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信