Alex E Rosenthal, Natalie Posever, Anna Modest, Andrew C Wiechert, Joanne W Jang, Katharine M Esselen
{"title":"III期子宫内膜癌辅助治疗结果的比较分析:总生存期、无复发生存期、原发复发部位和毒性。","authors":"Alex E Rosenthal, Natalie Posever, Anna Modest, Andrew C Wiechert, Joanne W Jang, Katharine M Esselen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adjuvant treatment for stage III endometrial cancer remains controversial due to varying results from large randomized studies. Our objectives were to assess differences in (1) recurrence-free survival and overall survival, (2) initial recurrence site, and (3) acute and long-term toxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy vs chemoradiation as initial adjuvant treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All stage III endometrial cancer patients treated at our institution from 2010 to 2021 were included. Treatment groups were defined as \"chemo\" if treated with upfront chemotherapy with or without subsequent radiation or \"concurrent\" if treated with chemoradiation with or without subsequent chemotherapy. Data were collected through retrospective chart review. Univariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards and generalized linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were eligible for analysis. After adjusting for stage and histology, there was no difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (HR 0.5, CI 0.22 to 1.11) with the chemotherapy group as reference. However, overall survival was improved in the concurrent group (HR 0.24 CI 0.06 to 0.90). When restricting the analysis to patients with endometrioid histology, overall survival was significantly improved in the concurrent group (HR 0.11, CI 0.16 to 0.73). In the full cohort, pelvic or para-aortic nodal recurrence (p = .01) and distant recurrence (p < .01) were significantly more likely in the chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences in high-grade toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with stage III endometrial cancer who received upfront concurrent treatment had improved overall survival compared with those who received upfront chemotherapy, without significant differences in high-grade toxicities. These findings should be considered in the design of future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 11","pages":"102119"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of adjuvant treatment outcomes in stage III endometrial cancer: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, site of primary recurrence, and toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Alex E Rosenthal, Natalie Posever, Anna Modest, Andrew C Wiechert, Joanne W Jang, Katharine M Esselen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adjuvant treatment for stage III endometrial cancer remains controversial due to varying results from large randomized studies. Our objectives were to assess differences in (1) recurrence-free survival and overall survival, (2) initial recurrence site, and (3) acute and long-term toxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy vs chemoradiation as initial adjuvant treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All stage III endometrial cancer patients treated at our institution from 2010 to 2021 were included. Treatment groups were defined as \\\"chemo\\\" if treated with upfront chemotherapy with or without subsequent radiation or \\\"concurrent\\\" if treated with chemoradiation with or without subsequent chemotherapy. Data were collected through retrospective chart review. Univariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards and generalized linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were eligible for analysis. After adjusting for stage and histology, there was no difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (HR 0.5, CI 0.22 to 1.11) with the chemotherapy group as reference. However, overall survival was improved in the concurrent group (HR 0.24 CI 0.06 to 0.90). When restricting the analysis to patients with endometrioid histology, overall survival was significantly improved in the concurrent group (HR 0.11, CI 0.16 to 0.73). In the full cohort, pelvic or para-aortic nodal recurrence (p = .01) and distant recurrence (p < .01) were significantly more likely in the chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences in high-grade toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with stage III endometrial cancer who received upfront concurrent treatment had improved overall survival compared with those who received upfront chemotherapy, without significant differences in high-grade toxicities. These findings should be considered in the design of future clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\"35 11\",\"pages\":\"102119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:由于大型随机研究的结果不同,III期子宫内膜癌的辅助治疗仍然存在争议。我们的目的是评估(1)无复发生存期和总生存期的差异,(2)初始复发部位,(3)接受化疗与放化疗作为初始辅助治疗的患者的急性和长期毒性。方法:纳入2010年至2021年在我院治疗的所有III期子宫内膜癌患者。治疗组被定义为“化疗组”,如果接受前期化疗,有或没有后续放疗;如果接受化疗,有或没有后续化疗,则被定义为“同步组”。通过回顾性图表分析收集数据。单因素分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验、Fisher精确检验和log-rank检验。采用Cox比例风险和广义线性回归模型进行多因素分析。结果:共有156例患者符合分析条件。在调整分期和组织学后,化疗组5年无复发生存率无差异(HR 0.5, CI 0.22 ~ 1.11)。然而,同时治疗组的总生存率提高(HR 0.24, CI 0.06 ~ 0.90)。当将分析限制在子宫内膜样组织学患者时,合并组的总生存率显著提高(HR 0.11, CI 0.16 ~ 0.73)。在整个队列中,化疗组盆腔或主动脉旁淋巴结复发(p = 0.01)和远处复发(p < 0.01)的可能性显著增加。两组在高级别毒性方面无显著差异。结论:与接受化疗的患者相比,接受前期同步治疗的III期子宫内膜癌患者的总生存率提高,在高级别毒性方面无显著差异。这些发现应该在未来临床试验的设计中加以考虑。
Comparative analysis of adjuvant treatment outcomes in stage III endometrial cancer: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, site of primary recurrence, and toxicity.
Objective: Adjuvant treatment for stage III endometrial cancer remains controversial due to varying results from large randomized studies. Our objectives were to assess differences in (1) recurrence-free survival and overall survival, (2) initial recurrence site, and (3) acute and long-term toxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy vs chemoradiation as initial adjuvant treatment.
Methods: All stage III endometrial cancer patients treated at our institution from 2010 to 2021 were included. Treatment groups were defined as "chemo" if treated with upfront chemotherapy with or without subsequent radiation or "concurrent" if treated with chemoradiation with or without subsequent chemotherapy. Data were collected through retrospective chart review. Univariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards and generalized linear regression models.
Results: A total of 156 patients were eligible for analysis. After adjusting for stage and histology, there was no difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (HR 0.5, CI 0.22 to 1.11) with the chemotherapy group as reference. However, overall survival was improved in the concurrent group (HR 0.24 CI 0.06 to 0.90). When restricting the analysis to patients with endometrioid histology, overall survival was significantly improved in the concurrent group (HR 0.11, CI 0.16 to 0.73). In the full cohort, pelvic or para-aortic nodal recurrence (p = .01) and distant recurrence (p < .01) were significantly more likely in the chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences in high-grade toxicities.
Conclusions: Patients with stage III endometrial cancer who received upfront concurrent treatment had improved overall survival compared with those who received upfront chemotherapy, without significant differences in high-grade toxicities. These findings should be considered in the design of future clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.