台湾炎症性肠病患者持续接受先进治疗的比较分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Horng-Yih Chiu, Chia-Jung Kuo, Ming-Wei Lai, Ren-Chin Wu, Chien-Ming Chen, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Yu-Bin Pan, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Puo-Hsien Le
{"title":"台湾炎症性肠病患者持续接受先进治疗的比较分析。","authors":"Horng-Yih Chiu, Chia-Jung Kuo, Ming-Wei Lai, Ren-Chin Wu, Chien-Ming Chen, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Yu-Bin Pan, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Puo-Hsien Le","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising in Asia. Advanced therapies, defined as biologics and small-molecule drug used for IBD treatment, have improved outcomes for moderate to severe IBD, making treatment selection critical. This is the first study in Taiwan comparing real-world persistence rates of advanced therapies in IBD patients in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 511 IBD patients from Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between October 2017 and January 2024. The five therapies evaluated were infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOF). Persistence within 52 weeks was assessed for biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 511 patients, 210 had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 301 had Crohn's disease (CD). UST showed the highest 52-week persistence in CD (91.08 %), followed by ADA (81.94 %), IFX (73.76 %), and VDZ (64.35 %), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). In UC, UST also had the highest persistence rate (78.95 %), though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.083). IFX had the highest discontinuation rate due to side effects (5.9 %) CONCLUSIONS: UST showed superior 52-week persistence in CD patients, though it also had the highest rate of dose escalation. IFX had the highest rate of discontinuation due to side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of persistence of advanced therapies among patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Horng-Yih Chiu, Chia-Jung Kuo, Ming-Wei Lai, Ren-Chin Wu, Chien-Ming Chen, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Yu-Bin Pan, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Puo-Hsien Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising in Asia. Advanced therapies, defined as biologics and small-molecule drug used for IBD treatment, have improved outcomes for moderate to severe IBD, making treatment selection critical. This is the first study in Taiwan comparing real-world persistence rates of advanced therapies in IBD patients in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 511 IBD patients from Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between October 2017 and January 2024. The five therapies evaluated were infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOF). Persistence within 52 weeks was assessed for biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 511 patients, 210 had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 301 had Crohn's disease (CD). UST showed the highest 52-week persistence in CD (91.08 %), followed by ADA (81.94 %), IFX (73.76 %), and VDZ (64.35 %), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). In UC, UST also had the highest persistence rate (78.95 %), though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.083). IFX had the highest discontinuation rate due to side effects (5.9 %) CONCLUSIONS: UST showed superior 52-week persistence in CD patients, though it also had the highest rate of dose escalation. IFX had the highest rate of discontinuation due to side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.09.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:炎症性肠病(IBD)在亚洲的患病率正在上升。先进的治疗方法,定义为用于IBD治疗的生物制剂和小分子药物,改善了中度至重度IBD的预后,使治疗选择变得至关重要。这是台湾第一个比较台湾IBD患者先进治疗的实际持续率的研究。方法:对2017年10月至2024年1月在林口长庚纪念医院就诊的511例IBD患者进行回顾性队列研究。评估的五种治疗方法是英夫利昔单抗(IFX)、阿达木单抗(ADA)、维多利单抗(VDZ)、乌斯特金单抗(UST)和托法替尼(TOF)。评估biologic-naïve和生物学经历的IBD患者52周内的持续性。结果:511例患者中,溃疡性结肠炎(UC) 210例,克罗恩病(CD) 301例。UST在CD中的52周持续时间最高(91.08%),其次是ADA(81.94%)、IFX(73.76%)和VDZ(64.35%),差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of persistence of advanced therapies among patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Taiwan.

Background/aims: The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising in Asia. Advanced therapies, defined as biologics and small-molecule drug used for IBD treatment, have improved outcomes for moderate to severe IBD, making treatment selection critical. This is the first study in Taiwan comparing real-world persistence rates of advanced therapies in IBD patients in Taiwan.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 511 IBD patients from Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between October 2017 and January 2024. The five therapies evaluated were infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOF). Persistence within 52 weeks was assessed for biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced IBD patients.

Results: Of the 511 patients, 210 had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 301 had Crohn's disease (CD). UST showed the highest 52-week persistence in CD (91.08 %), followed by ADA (81.94 %), IFX (73.76 %), and VDZ (64.35 %), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). In UC, UST also had the highest persistence rate (78.95 %), though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.083). IFX had the highest discontinuation rate due to side effects (5.9 %) CONCLUSIONS: UST showed superior 52-week persistence in CD patients, though it also had the highest rate of dose escalation. IFX had the highest rate of discontinuation due to side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信