Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测对肺和肺外标本的诊断性能:芬兰低发病率环境中的回顾性评估。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bruno Luukinen, Maarit Ahava, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Anu Pätäri-Sampo
{"title":"Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测对肺和肺外标本的诊断性能:芬兰低发病率环境中的回顾性评估。","authors":"Bruno Luukinen, Maarit Ahava, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Anu Pätäri-Sampo","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay in the detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in comparison to pulmonary TB in a low-incidence setting in the Helsinki capital area of Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective analysis included results from 1112 pulmonary and 705 extrapulmonary samples collected between 2018 and 2023, of which 193 and 136 were culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), respectively. Xpert Ultra results were compared with mycobacterial culture. PCR-positive and culture-negative cases were separately compared with available clinical data (composite reference standard, CRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with culture, Xpert Ultra demonstrated 95.3% sensitivity (95% CI, 91.3%-97.7%) and 94.5% specificity (95% CI, 92.8%-95.8%) with pulmonary samples, 47.1% (95% CI, 26.2%-69.0%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 93.8%-98.4%) with pleural fluid, 100% (95% CI, 86.9%-100%) and 81.8% (95% CI, 72.4%-88.6%) with tissue, 96.6% (95% CI, 81.4%-100%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 62.2%-84.6%) with pus, and 95.1% (95% CI, 83.0%-99.5%) and 67.5% (95% CI, 51.9%-80.0%) with lymph node samples, respectively. Other, less common sample types were also included. When CRS was also considered, specificity exceeded 93% for all sample types. Sensitivity was 100% with both smear-positive pulmonary and smear-positive extrapulmonary samples. Neither false rifampicin susceptibility testing results nor cross-reactivity with nontuberculous mycobacteria was detected.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Xpert Ultra detected MTB in lymph node, tissue, and pus samples with high-accuracy comparable with the analysis of pulmonary samples while reducing the time to diagnosis by up to several weeks compared with mycobacterial culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay with pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens: a retrospective evaluation in a low-incidence setting in Finland.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Luukinen, Maarit Ahava, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Anu Pätäri-Sampo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay in the detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in comparison to pulmonary TB in a low-incidence setting in the Helsinki capital area of Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective analysis included results from 1112 pulmonary and 705 extrapulmonary samples collected between 2018 and 2023, of which 193 and 136 were culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), respectively. Xpert Ultra results were compared with mycobacterial culture. PCR-positive and culture-negative cases were separately compared with available clinical data (composite reference standard, CRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with culture, Xpert Ultra demonstrated 95.3% sensitivity (95% CI, 91.3%-97.7%) and 94.5% specificity (95% CI, 92.8%-95.8%) with pulmonary samples, 47.1% (95% CI, 26.2%-69.0%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 93.8%-98.4%) with pleural fluid, 100% (95% CI, 86.9%-100%) and 81.8% (95% CI, 72.4%-88.6%) with tissue, 96.6% (95% CI, 81.4%-100%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 62.2%-84.6%) with pus, and 95.1% (95% CI, 83.0%-99.5%) and 67.5% (95% CI, 51.9%-80.0%) with lymph node samples, respectively. Other, less common sample types were also included. When CRS was also considered, specificity exceeded 93% for all sample types. Sensitivity was 100% with both smear-positive pulmonary and smear-positive extrapulmonary samples. Neither false rifampicin susceptibility testing results nor cross-reactivity with nontuberculous mycobacteria was detected.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Xpert Ultra detected MTB in lymph node, tissue, and pus samples with high-accuracy comparable with the analysis of pulmonary samples while reducing the time to diagnosis by up to several weeks compared with mycobacterial culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是评估Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra)检测肺外结核(TB)的敏感性和特异性,并与芬兰首都赫尔辛基地区低发病率环境下的肺结核进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2023年收集的1112例肺样本和705例肺外样本,其中结核分枝杆菌(MTB)培养阳性193例和136例。将Xpert Ultra结果与分枝杆菌培养结果进行比较。PCR阳性和培养阴性病例分别与现有临床资料(综合参考标准,CRS)进行比较。结果:与培养相比,Xpert Ultra对肺标本的敏感性为95.3% (95% CI: 91.3-97.7%),特异性为94.5% (95% CI: 92.8-95.8%),对胸膜液的敏感性为47.1% (95% CI: 26.2-69.0%)和96.7% (95% CI: 93.8-98.4%),对组织的敏感性为100% (95% CI: 86.9-100%)和81.8% (95% CI: 72.4-88.6%),对脓液的敏感性为96.6% (95% CI: 81.4-100%)和75.0% (95% CI: 62.2-84.6%),对淋巴结标本的敏感性分别为95.1% (95% CI: 83.0-99.5%)和67.5% (95% CI: 51.9-80.0%)。其他不太常见的样本类型也包括在内。当考虑CRS时,所有样本类型的特异性均超过93%。对涂片阳性肺标本和涂片阳性肺外标本的敏感性均为100%。未发现假利福平药敏试验结果或与非结核分枝杆菌交叉反应。结论:Xpert Ultra在淋巴结、组织和脓液样本中检测MTB的准确性与肺样本的分析相当,同时与分枝杆菌培养相比,诊断时间缩短了数周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay with pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens: a retrospective evaluation in a low-incidence setting in Finland.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay in the detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in comparison to pulmonary TB in a low-incidence setting in the Helsinki capital area of Finland.

Methods: The retrospective analysis included results from 1112 pulmonary and 705 extrapulmonary samples collected between 2018 and 2023, of which 193 and 136 were culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), respectively. Xpert Ultra results were compared with mycobacterial culture. PCR-positive and culture-negative cases were separately compared with available clinical data (composite reference standard, CRS).

Results: Compared with culture, Xpert Ultra demonstrated 95.3% sensitivity (95% CI, 91.3%-97.7%) and 94.5% specificity (95% CI, 92.8%-95.8%) with pulmonary samples, 47.1% (95% CI, 26.2%-69.0%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 93.8%-98.4%) with pleural fluid, 100% (95% CI, 86.9%-100%) and 81.8% (95% CI, 72.4%-88.6%) with tissue, 96.6% (95% CI, 81.4%-100%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 62.2%-84.6%) with pus, and 95.1% (95% CI, 83.0%-99.5%) and 67.5% (95% CI, 51.9%-80.0%) with lymph node samples, respectively. Other, less common sample types were also included. When CRS was also considered, specificity exceeded 93% for all sample types. Sensitivity was 100% with both smear-positive pulmonary and smear-positive extrapulmonary samples. Neither false rifampicin susceptibility testing results nor cross-reactivity with nontuberculous mycobacteria was detected.

Discussion: Xpert Ultra detected MTB in lymph node, tissue, and pus samples with high-accuracy comparable with the analysis of pulmonary samples while reducing the time to diagnosis by up to several weeks compared with mycobacterial culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信