炎性肠病是诊断性结肠镜检查穿孔的危险因素吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bachviet Nguyen, Stephanie Quon
{"title":"炎性肠病是诊断性结肠镜检查穿孔的危险因素吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bachviet Nguyen, Stephanie Quon","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09392-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may predispose patients to complications during colonoscopy, including colonic perforation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether IBD is associated with an increased risk of colonic perforation compared to non-IBD patients during colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to June 2025 for studies comparing rates of colonic perforation during diagnostic, screening, or surveillance colonoscopy in IBD versus non-IBD patients. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), with between-study heterogeneity assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across eight retrospective cohort studies comprising over 9 million patients (686,258 with IBD), the pooled OR for colonic perforation in IBD patients during colonoscopy was 1.22 (95% CI 0.89-1.68; p = 0.2199), which did not reach statistical significance. Heterogeneity was high (I<sup>2</sup> = 82.1%). Subgroup analysis for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease demonstrated a pooled OR of 1.05 (95% CI 0.32-3.40) and OR 1.16 (95% CI 0.71-1.92) respectively. Only one study was judged to have a low risk of bias across all domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A diagnosis of IBD (either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) is not significantly associated with an increased risk of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. Subgroup differences, study heterogeneity, and methodological limitations suggest a need for further research to better quantify this risk and guide procedural planning in IBD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Inflammatory Bowel Disease a Risk Factor for Perforation During Diagnostic Colonoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bachviet Nguyen, Stephanie Quon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09392-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may predispose patients to complications during colonoscopy, including colonic perforation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether IBD is associated with an increased risk of colonic perforation compared to non-IBD patients during colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to June 2025 for studies comparing rates of colonic perforation during diagnostic, screening, or surveillance colonoscopy in IBD versus non-IBD patients. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), with between-study heterogeneity assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across eight retrospective cohort studies comprising over 9 million patients (686,258 with IBD), the pooled OR for colonic perforation in IBD patients during colonoscopy was 1.22 (95% CI 0.89-1.68; p = 0.2199), which did not reach statistical significance. Heterogeneity was high (I<sup>2</sup> = 82.1%). Subgroup analysis for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease demonstrated a pooled OR of 1.05 (95% CI 0.32-3.40) and OR 1.16 (95% CI 0.71-1.92) respectively. Only one study was judged to have a low risk of bias across all domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A diagnosis of IBD (either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) is not significantly associated with an increased risk of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. Subgroup differences, study heterogeneity, and methodological limitations suggest a need for further research to better quantify this risk and guide procedural planning in IBD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09392-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09392-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:炎症性肠病(IBD)可能使患者在结肠镜检查时易发生并发症,包括结肠穿孔。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定在结肠镜检查期间,与非IBD患者相比,IBD是否与结肠穿孔风险增加有关。方法:我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、PubMed和Embase,从成立到2025年6月,比较IBD与非IBD患者在诊断、筛查或监测结肠镜检查期间结肠穿孔率的研究。进行随机效应荟萃分析以计算合并优势比(or),并使用I2统计量评估研究间异质性。使用ROBINS-E工具评估偏倚风险。结果:8项回顾性队列研究共纳入900多万例IBD患者(686,258例),IBD患者结肠镜检查时结肠穿孔的合并OR为1.22 (95% CI 0.89-1.68; p = 0.2199),无统计学意义。异质性高(I2 = 82.1%)。溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病的亚组分析显示合并OR分别为1.05 (95% CI 0.32-3.40)和1.16 (95% CI 0.71-1.92)。只有一项研究被判定在所有领域具有低偏倚风险。结论:在结肠镜检查中,IBD(溃疡性结肠炎或克罗恩病)的诊断与结肠穿孔的风险增加没有显著相关。亚组差异、研究异质性和方法局限性表明,需要进一步研究以更好地量化这种风险,并指导IBD患者的手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Inflammatory Bowel Disease a Risk Factor for Perforation During Diagnostic Colonoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may predispose patients to complications during colonoscopy, including colonic perforation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether IBD is associated with an increased risk of colonic perforation compared to non-IBD patients during colonoscopy.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to June 2025 for studies comparing rates of colonic perforation during diagnostic, screening, or surveillance colonoscopy in IBD versus non-IBD patients. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), with between-study heterogeneity assessed using I2 statistics. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool.

Results: Across eight retrospective cohort studies comprising over 9 million patients (686,258 with IBD), the pooled OR for colonic perforation in IBD patients during colonoscopy was 1.22 (95% CI 0.89-1.68; p = 0.2199), which did not reach statistical significance. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 82.1%). Subgroup analysis for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease demonstrated a pooled OR of 1.05 (95% CI 0.32-3.40) and OR 1.16 (95% CI 0.71-1.92) respectively. Only one study was judged to have a low risk of bias across all domains.

Conclusion: A diagnosis of IBD (either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) is not significantly associated with an increased risk of colonic perforation during colonoscopy. Subgroup differences, study heterogeneity, and methodological limitations suggest a need for further research to better quantify this risk and guide procedural planning in IBD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信