建立公平参与:加强参与式科学多样化参与的战略

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kelsey Jennings, Ashley Dayer, Willandia Chaves
{"title":"建立公平参与:加强参与式科学多样化参与的战略","authors":"Kelsey Jennings,&nbsp;Ashley Dayer,&nbsp;Willandia Chaves","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Co-created participatory science offers an innovative approach to engaging diverse communities in scientific research, challenging traditional top-down approaches to science, and fostering meaningful collaborations between scientists and volunteers. However, despite the growth of participatory science programs, participation remains largely homogenous in the United States, with underrepresentation of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities. This manuscript explores the facilitators and constraints to BIPOC participation in participatory science. We also utilize an asset-based framework, community cultural wealth (CCW), in novel applications to understand persistence in engagement while recognizing the systemic barriers that still exist. Through online focus groups with BIPOC-serving program practitioners and BIPOC participants, we identified key factors encouraging BIPOC participation, such as community-oriented and -led programs and opportunities to build and share knowledge and expertise, highlighting the role of CCW. Despite interest, persistent barriers included the perception of outdoor spaces as White-dominated, financial constraints, and discrimination. We recommend adopting a co-created research approach, tailoring programs to meet community needs, and investing in long-term, sustainable engagement strategies to support BIPOC communities in participatory science. This research underscores the importance of centering community voices, intersectionality, and persistent efforts in fostering equity within science institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building equitable engagement: Strategies for enhancing diverse engagement in participatory science\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Jennings,&nbsp;Ashley Dayer,&nbsp;Willandia Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.70129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Co-created participatory science offers an innovative approach to engaging diverse communities in scientific research, challenging traditional top-down approaches to science, and fostering meaningful collaborations between scientists and volunteers. However, despite the growth of participatory science programs, participation remains largely homogenous in the United States, with underrepresentation of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities. This manuscript explores the facilitators and constraints to BIPOC participation in participatory science. We also utilize an asset-based framework, community cultural wealth (CCW), in novel applications to understand persistence in engagement while recognizing the systemic barriers that still exist. Through online focus groups with BIPOC-serving program practitioners and BIPOC participants, we identified key factors encouraging BIPOC participation, such as community-oriented and -led programs and opportunities to build and share knowledge and expertise, highlighting the role of CCW. Despite interest, persistent barriers included the perception of outdoor spaces as White-dominated, financial constraints, and discrimination. We recommend adopting a co-created research approach, tailoring programs to meet community needs, and investing in long-term, sustainable engagement strategies to support BIPOC communities in participatory science. This research underscores the importance of centering community voices, intersectionality, and persistent efforts in fostering equity within science institutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70129\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70129\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共同创造的参与式科学提供了一种创新的方法,使不同的社区参与科学研究,挑战传统的自上而下的科学方法,并促进科学家和志愿者之间有意义的合作。然而,尽管参与式科学项目有所增长,但在美国,参与程度仍然很大程度上是同质的,黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)社区的代表性不足。本文探讨了BIPOC参与参与科学的促进因素和制约因素。我们还利用基于资产的框架,社区文化财富(CCW),在新应用中理解参与的持久性,同时认识到仍然存在的系统性障碍。通过与BIPOC服务项目从业者和BIPOC参与者的在线焦点小组,我们确定了鼓励BIPOC参与的关键因素,例如以社区为导向和主导的项目,以及建立和分享知识和专业知识的机会,强调了CCW的作用。尽管有兴趣,但持续存在的障碍包括户外空间以白人为主的观念、财政限制和歧视。我们建议采用共同创建的研究方法,定制项目以满足社区需求,并投资于长期、可持续的参与战略,以支持BIPOC社区参与科学。这项研究强调了在促进科学机构内部公平方面集中社区声音、交叉性和持续努力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Building equitable engagement: Strategies for enhancing diverse engagement in participatory science

Building equitable engagement: Strategies for enhancing diverse engagement in participatory science

Building equitable engagement: Strategies for enhancing diverse engagement in participatory science

Building equitable engagement: Strategies for enhancing diverse engagement in participatory science

Co-created participatory science offers an innovative approach to engaging diverse communities in scientific research, challenging traditional top-down approaches to science, and fostering meaningful collaborations between scientists and volunteers. However, despite the growth of participatory science programs, participation remains largely homogenous in the United States, with underrepresentation of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities. This manuscript explores the facilitators and constraints to BIPOC participation in participatory science. We also utilize an asset-based framework, community cultural wealth (CCW), in novel applications to understand persistence in engagement while recognizing the systemic barriers that still exist. Through online focus groups with BIPOC-serving program practitioners and BIPOC participants, we identified key factors encouraging BIPOC participation, such as community-oriented and -led programs and opportunities to build and share knowledge and expertise, highlighting the role of CCW. Despite interest, persistent barriers included the perception of outdoor spaces as White-dominated, financial constraints, and discrimination. We recommend adopting a co-created research approach, tailoring programs to meet community needs, and investing in long-term, sustainable engagement strategies to support BIPOC communities in participatory science. This research underscores the importance of centering community voices, intersectionality, and persistent efforts in fostering equity within science institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信