Sukkyung Kang, JinHyeuk Seo, Jeong-Bin Lim, Jungho Lee
{"title":"热管换热器有效回收锅炉烟气余热:与翅片管省煤器性能比较","authors":"Sukkyung Kang, JinHyeuk Seo, Jeong-Bin Lim, Jungho Lee","doi":"10.1155/er/8781810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates the potential of a heat pipe heat exchanger (HPHX) as a boiler economizer, which recovers waste heat from exhaust flue gas for preheating feedwater, compared to the conventional one, finned-tube heat exchanger (FTHX), focusing on their waste heat recovery (WHR) capabilities. Experiments were conducted on the original economizer of an experimental liquefied natural gas (LNG) steam boiler (FTHX) and HPHX we fabricated, under actual boiler operating environments, measuring their heat transfer rate and effectiveness. The results showed that both heat exchangers exhibited comparable thermal performance. However, the HPHX achieved significantly higher performance considering heat exchanger dimensions, with a heat transfer rate per unit volume 3.24 times higher than FTHX, thanks to its working mechanism utilizing latent heat. To further evaluate HPHX’s potential, the performance of HPHX with the same dimensions as FTHX was examined based on an empirical model for HPHX. Our analysis revealed that, compared to the FTHX, the HPHX could improve heat recovery rate by up to 11.0%, increase feedwater temperature by 6.9°C, and enhance boiler efficiency by approximately 1.28%. Moreover, additional investigation based on design modifications showed that the superior thermal performance of the HPHX enables a more compact heat exchanger design, allowing a 36% reduction in length without compromising WHR performance. These findings demonstrate the HPHX’s capability to increase boiler efficiency and/or enable system compactness, suggesting that it is a promising alternative to the conventional finned-tube economizer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/8781810","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Waste Heat Recovery of Boiler Flue Gas Using a Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger: A Performance Comparison With Finned-Tube Economizer\",\"authors\":\"Sukkyung Kang, JinHyeuk Seo, Jeong-Bin Lim, Jungho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/er/8781810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluates the potential of a heat pipe heat exchanger (HPHX) as a boiler economizer, which recovers waste heat from exhaust flue gas for preheating feedwater, compared to the conventional one, finned-tube heat exchanger (FTHX), focusing on their waste heat recovery (WHR) capabilities. Experiments were conducted on the original economizer of an experimental liquefied natural gas (LNG) steam boiler (FTHX) and HPHX we fabricated, under actual boiler operating environments, measuring their heat transfer rate and effectiveness. The results showed that both heat exchangers exhibited comparable thermal performance. However, the HPHX achieved significantly higher performance considering heat exchanger dimensions, with a heat transfer rate per unit volume 3.24 times higher than FTHX, thanks to its working mechanism utilizing latent heat. To further evaluate HPHX’s potential, the performance of HPHX with the same dimensions as FTHX was examined based on an empirical model for HPHX. Our analysis revealed that, compared to the FTHX, the HPHX could improve heat recovery rate by up to 11.0%, increase feedwater temperature by 6.9°C, and enhance boiler efficiency by approximately 1.28%. Moreover, additional investigation based on design modifications showed that the superior thermal performance of the HPHX enables a more compact heat exchanger design, allowing a 36% reduction in length without compromising WHR performance. These findings demonstrate the HPHX’s capability to increase boiler efficiency and/or enable system compactness, suggesting that it is a promising alternative to the conventional finned-tube economizer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/8781810\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/8781810\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/8781810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effective Waste Heat Recovery of Boiler Flue Gas Using a Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger: A Performance Comparison With Finned-Tube Economizer
This study evaluates the potential of a heat pipe heat exchanger (HPHX) as a boiler economizer, which recovers waste heat from exhaust flue gas for preheating feedwater, compared to the conventional one, finned-tube heat exchanger (FTHX), focusing on their waste heat recovery (WHR) capabilities. Experiments were conducted on the original economizer of an experimental liquefied natural gas (LNG) steam boiler (FTHX) and HPHX we fabricated, under actual boiler operating environments, measuring their heat transfer rate and effectiveness. The results showed that both heat exchangers exhibited comparable thermal performance. However, the HPHX achieved significantly higher performance considering heat exchanger dimensions, with a heat transfer rate per unit volume 3.24 times higher than FTHX, thanks to its working mechanism utilizing latent heat. To further evaluate HPHX’s potential, the performance of HPHX with the same dimensions as FTHX was examined based on an empirical model for HPHX. Our analysis revealed that, compared to the FTHX, the HPHX could improve heat recovery rate by up to 11.0%, increase feedwater temperature by 6.9°C, and enhance boiler efficiency by approximately 1.28%. Moreover, additional investigation based on design modifications showed that the superior thermal performance of the HPHX enables a more compact heat exchanger design, allowing a 36% reduction in length without compromising WHR performance. These findings demonstrate the HPHX’s capability to increase boiler efficiency and/or enable system compactness, suggesting that it is a promising alternative to the conventional finned-tube economizer.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability.
IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents:
-Biofuels and alternatives
-Carbon capturing and storage technologies
-Clean coal technologies
-Energy conversion, conservation and management
-Energy storage
-Energy systems
-Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
-Hydrogen energy and fuel cells
-Hydrogen production technologies
-Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
-Nuclear energy
-Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass)
-Smart energy system