小学教室空气质量:PM10和PM2.5水平与室外和建筑环境特征的关系

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Indoor air Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1155/ina/3809714
Antonis Michanikou, Panayiotis Kouis, Souzana Achilleos, Paraskevi Kinni, Emily Vasiliadou, Chrysanthos Savvides, Petros Mouzourides, Marina K.A. Neophytou, Petros Koutrakis, Panayiotis K. Yiallouros
{"title":"小学教室空气质量:PM10和PM2.5水平与室外和建筑环境特征的关系","authors":"Antonis Michanikou,&nbsp;Panayiotis Kouis,&nbsp;Souzana Achilleos,&nbsp;Paraskevi Kinni,&nbsp;Emily Vasiliadou,&nbsp;Chrysanthos Savvides,&nbsp;Petros Mouzourides,&nbsp;Marina K.A. Neophytou,&nbsp;Petros Koutrakis,&nbsp;Panayiotis K. Yiallouros","doi":"10.1155/ina/3809714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Particulate matter (PM) levels in school classrooms represent a significant fraction of the daily exposure to air pollution among schoolchildren. PM levels may vary over time and may be influenced by a variety of environmental factors. However, previous studies on classrooms’ PM levels relied on short-term measurements, while relevant data from Europe remain scarce. We aimed to prospectively monitor PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 <i>μ</i>m) and PM<sub>10</sub> (PM with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 <i>μ</i>m) levels in school classrooms and explore their relationships with outdoor and built environment characteristics, especially during teaching periods. By addressing PM exposure during teaching periods and evaluating the effects of mitigation measures, built characteristics, and environmental factors within primary school settings in Cyprus, this study fills critical gaps in understanding particulate exposure in educational environments.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> From March to June 2021, indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations were assessed prospectively using optical particle sensors, in classrooms across nine primary schools in Nicosia, Cyprus. School hours were divided into distinct teaching and recess periods to study the variations in PM levels throughout the day, as well as the effect of outdoor sources. Indoor measurements were analyzed using 2-min intervals. Corresponding time-stamped data on outdoor air pollution were obtained from the nearest air quality station. Additionally, direct, on-site comparison of indoor versus outdoor PM concentrations was possible using weekly gravimetric measurements by low-volume Harvard samplers. Data on the built environment were collected from on-site assessments and questionnaires. A linear mixed effects model was defined by fixed effects for the exposure variables and random intercepts to account for daily variations in PM levels, with additional variability between classrooms nested within each day.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Teaching periods, particularly after recess breaks, showed higher PM<sub>10</sub> (+28.2%) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (+13.4%) levels than teaching periods before recess (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Outdoor pollution had the most significant impact on indoor classroom PM<sub>10</sub> (+227.9%) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (+84.3%) levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Accessibility to soil yards led to substantially higher PM<sub>10</sub> (86.1%) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (89.9%) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Classroom windows per square meter resulted in a 10.4% lower level of PM<sub>10</sub>, but a 5.5% higher level in PM<sub>2.5</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Classrooms on upper floors were associated with 17.3% lower PM<sub>10</sub> levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Both temperature and relative humidity were positively associated with PM levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The use of air purifiers significantly reduced PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels by 43.5% and 30.4%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> We demonstrated the significant impact of various factors on indoor PM levels in classrooms, including outdoor pollution, soil yard accessibility, and specific classroom characteristics. While air purifiers effectively reduce PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, other factors such as teaching periods, temperature, and humidity also play critical roles, emphasizing the need for comprehensive air quality management strategies in schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/3809714","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air Quality in Primary School Classrooms: Associations of PM10 and PM2.5 Levels With Outdoor and Built Environment Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Antonis Michanikou,&nbsp;Panayiotis Kouis,&nbsp;Souzana Achilleos,&nbsp;Paraskevi Kinni,&nbsp;Emily Vasiliadou,&nbsp;Chrysanthos Savvides,&nbsp;Petros Mouzourides,&nbsp;Marina K.A. Neophytou,&nbsp;Petros Koutrakis,&nbsp;Panayiotis K. Yiallouros\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ina/3809714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> Particulate matter (PM) levels in school classrooms represent a significant fraction of the daily exposure to air pollution among schoolchildren. PM levels may vary over time and may be influenced by a variety of environmental factors. However, previous studies on classrooms’ PM levels relied on short-term measurements, while relevant data from Europe remain scarce. We aimed to prospectively monitor PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 <i>μ</i>m) and PM<sub>10</sub> (PM with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 <i>μ</i>m) levels in school classrooms and explore their relationships with outdoor and built environment characteristics, especially during teaching periods. By addressing PM exposure during teaching periods and evaluating the effects of mitigation measures, built characteristics, and environmental factors within primary school settings in Cyprus, this study fills critical gaps in understanding particulate exposure in educational environments.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> From March to June 2021, indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations were assessed prospectively using optical particle sensors, in classrooms across nine primary schools in Nicosia, Cyprus. School hours were divided into distinct teaching and recess periods to study the variations in PM levels throughout the day, as well as the effect of outdoor sources. Indoor measurements were analyzed using 2-min intervals. Corresponding time-stamped data on outdoor air pollution were obtained from the nearest air quality station. Additionally, direct, on-site comparison of indoor versus outdoor PM concentrations was possible using weekly gravimetric measurements by low-volume Harvard samplers. Data on the built environment were collected from on-site assessments and questionnaires. A linear mixed effects model was defined by fixed effects for the exposure variables and random intercepts to account for daily variations in PM levels, with additional variability between classrooms nested within each day.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Teaching periods, particularly after recess breaks, showed higher PM<sub>10</sub> (+28.2%) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (+13.4%) levels than teaching periods before recess (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Outdoor pollution had the most significant impact on indoor classroom PM<sub>10</sub> (+227.9%) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (+84.3%) levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Accessibility to soil yards led to substantially higher PM<sub>10</sub> (86.1%) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (89.9%) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Classroom windows per square meter resulted in a 10.4% lower level of PM<sub>10</sub>, but a 5.5% higher level in PM<sub>2.5</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Classrooms on upper floors were associated with 17.3% lower PM<sub>10</sub> levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Both temperature and relative humidity were positively associated with PM levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The use of air purifiers significantly reduced PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels by 43.5% and 30.4%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> We demonstrated the significant impact of various factors on indoor PM levels in classrooms, including outdoor pollution, soil yard accessibility, and specific classroom characteristics. While air purifiers effectively reduce PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, other factors such as teaching periods, temperature, and humidity also play critical roles, emphasizing the need for comprehensive air quality management strategies in schools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor air\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/3809714\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/3809714\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/3809714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学校教室中的颗粒物(PM)水平占学童每日空气污染暴露的很大一部分。PM水平可能随时间而变化,并可能受到各种环境因素的影响。然而,之前关于教室PM水平的研究依赖于短期测量,而来自欧洲的相关数据仍然很少。本研究旨在对学校教室内PM2.5(空气动力直径≤2.5 μm的PM)和PM10(空气动力直径≤10 μm的PM)水平进行前瞻性监测,并探讨其与室外和建筑环境特征的关系,特别是在教学期间。通过解决教学期间的PM暴露问题,并评估缓解措施、建筑特征和塞浦路斯小学环境中的环境因素的影响,本研究填补了了解教育环境中颗粒物暴露的关键空白。方法:2021年3月至6月,在塞浦路斯尼科西亚9所小学的教室中,使用光学颗粒传感器对室内PM2.5和PM10浓度进行前瞻性评估。学校时间被划分为不同的教学和休息时间,以研究全天PM水平的变化以及室外源的影响。室内测量以2分钟为间隔进行分析。从最近的空气质量监测站获得相应的室外空气污染时间戳数据。此外,通过每周使用小体积哈佛采样器进行重量测量,可以直接进行室内和室外PM浓度的现场比较。有关建筑环境的数据是通过现场评估和问卷调查收集的。线性混合效应模型由暴露变量的固定效应和随机截点定义,以解释PM水平的每日变化,以及每天嵌套的教室之间的额外变化。结果:教学期间,特别是课间休息后,PM10(+28.2%)和PM2.5(+13.4%)水平高于课间休息前(p < 0.001)。室外污染对室内教室PM10(+227.9%)和PM2.5(+84.3%)水平的影响最为显著(p < 0.001)。土壤庭院的可达性导致PM10(86.1%)和PM2.5(89.9%)显著增加(p < 0.001)。每平方米教室窗户的PM10水平降低了10.4%,PM2.5水平提高了5.5% (p < 0.05)。上层教室的PM10水平降低了17.3% (p < 0.001)。温度和相对湿度都与PM水平呈正相关(p < 0.001)。使用空气净化器可显著降低PM10和PM2.5水平,分别降低43.5%和30.4% (p < 0.001)。结论:我们证明了各种因素对教室室内PM水平的显著影响,包括室外污染、土壤庭院可达性和教室特定特征。虽然空气净化器能有效降低PM10和PM2.5水平,但教学时间、温度和湿度等其他因素也起着至关重要的作用,这强调了学校全面空气质量管理策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Air Quality in Primary School Classrooms: Associations of PM10 and PM2.5 Levels With Outdoor and Built Environment Characteristics

Air Quality in Primary School Classrooms: Associations of PM10 and PM2.5 Levels With Outdoor and Built Environment Characteristics

Background: Particulate matter (PM) levels in school classrooms represent a significant fraction of the daily exposure to air pollution among schoolchildren. PM levels may vary over time and may be influenced by a variety of environmental factors. However, previous studies on classrooms’ PM levels relied on short-term measurements, while relevant data from Europe remain scarce. We aimed to prospectively monitor PM2.5 (PM with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm) and PM10 (PM with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 μm) levels in school classrooms and explore their relationships with outdoor and built environment characteristics, especially during teaching periods. By addressing PM exposure during teaching periods and evaluating the effects of mitigation measures, built characteristics, and environmental factors within primary school settings in Cyprus, this study fills critical gaps in understanding particulate exposure in educational environments.

Methods: From March to June 2021, indoor PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were assessed prospectively using optical particle sensors, in classrooms across nine primary schools in Nicosia, Cyprus. School hours were divided into distinct teaching and recess periods to study the variations in PM levels throughout the day, as well as the effect of outdoor sources. Indoor measurements were analyzed using 2-min intervals. Corresponding time-stamped data on outdoor air pollution were obtained from the nearest air quality station. Additionally, direct, on-site comparison of indoor versus outdoor PM concentrations was possible using weekly gravimetric measurements by low-volume Harvard samplers. Data on the built environment were collected from on-site assessments and questionnaires. A linear mixed effects model was defined by fixed effects for the exposure variables and random intercepts to account for daily variations in PM levels, with additional variability between classrooms nested within each day.

Results: Teaching periods, particularly after recess breaks, showed higher PM10 (+28.2%) and PM2.5 (+13.4%) levels than teaching periods before recess (p < 0.001). Outdoor pollution had the most significant impact on indoor classroom PM10 (+227.9%) and PM2.5 (+84.3%) levels (p < 0.001). Accessibility to soil yards led to substantially higher PM10 (86.1%) and PM2.5 (89.9%) (p < 0.001). Classroom windows per square meter resulted in a 10.4% lower level of PM10, but a 5.5% higher level in PM2.5 (p < 0.05). Classrooms on upper floors were associated with 17.3% lower PM10 levels (p < 0.001). Both temperature and relative humidity were positively associated with PM levels (p < 0.001). The use of air purifiers significantly reduced PM10 and PM2.5 levels by 43.5% and 30.4%, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: We demonstrated the significant impact of various factors on indoor PM levels in classrooms, including outdoor pollution, soil yard accessibility, and specific classroom characteristics. While air purifiers effectively reduce PM10 and PM2.5 levels, other factors such as teaching periods, temperature, and humidity also play critical roles, emphasizing the need for comprehensive air quality management strategies in schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indoor air
Indoor air 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health. Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques. The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信