Florian Neukart, Eike Marx, Valerii Vinokur, Jeff Titus
{"title":"增强的qmm纠错:展示可逆印迹和鲁棒量子计算的检索","authors":"Florian Neukart, Eike Marx, Valerii Vinokur, Jeff Titus","doi":"10.1002/qute.202500262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The first hardware evidence is reported that a Quantum Memory Matrix (QMM) - conceived as a Planck-scale lattice of finite-dimensional memory cells - functions as an ultra-shallow, measurement-free error-suppression layer for noisy intermediate-scale quantum processors. On a seven-qubit IBM transmon device, quantum states are imprint onto local cells with single-qubit <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>y</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$R_y$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and nearest-neighbor <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$CRY$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> gates and later retrieve them through a controlled-SWAP, guaranteeing unitary reversibility. A single imprint–retrieval cycle attains a hardware fidelity of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0.73</mn>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>0.01</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$0.73\\pm 0.01$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>; prepending the same layer to a conventional <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n <mn>3</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>3</mn>\n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$[3,1,3]$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> repetition code boosts the logical fidelity to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0.941</mn>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>0.004</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$0.941\\pm 0.004$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> - a 32 % improvement obtained without additional CX gates. Incorporating the layer into a variational quantum classifier lowers the final training loss by 35 % and halves run-to-run variance, evidencing its value for hybrid quantum-classical workloads. Noise-calibrated simulations further show that stacking three QMM layers brings the logical error rate to within 20 % of a distance-three surface code while using an order of magnitude fewer qubits. Because the QMM booster is fully unitary and eschews mid-circuit measurement, it is directly compatible with platforms where rapid stabilizer read-out is impractical and provides empirical support for the broader notion that space-time itself may behave as a distributed quantum memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":72073,"journal":{"name":"Advanced quantum technologies","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/qute.202500262","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QMM-Enhanced Error Correction: Demonstrating Reversible Imprinting and Retrieval for Robust Quantum Computation\",\"authors\":\"Florian Neukart, Eike Marx, Valerii Vinokur, Jeff Titus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qute.202500262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The first hardware evidence is reported that a Quantum Memory Matrix (QMM) - conceived as a Planck-scale lattice of finite-dimensional memory cells - functions as an ultra-shallow, measurement-free error-suppression layer for noisy intermediate-scale quantum processors. On a seven-qubit IBM transmon device, quantum states are imprint onto local cells with single-qubit <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>y</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$R_y$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and nearest-neighbor <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>Y</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$CRY$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> gates and later retrieve them through a controlled-SWAP, guaranteeing unitary reversibility. A single imprint–retrieval cycle attains a hardware fidelity of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>0.73</mn>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mn>0.01</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$0.73\\\\pm 0.01$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>; prepending the same layer to a conventional <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>[</mo>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n <mo>]</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$[3,1,3]$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> repetition code boosts the logical fidelity to <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>0.941</mn>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mn>0.004</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$0.941\\\\pm 0.004$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> - a 32 % improvement obtained without additional CX gates. Incorporating the layer into a variational quantum classifier lowers the final training loss by 35 % and halves run-to-run variance, evidencing its value for hybrid quantum-classical workloads. Noise-calibrated simulations further show that stacking three QMM layers brings the logical error rate to within 20 % of a distance-three surface code while using an order of magnitude fewer qubits. Because the QMM booster is fully unitary and eschews mid-circuit measurement, it is directly compatible with platforms where rapid stabilizer read-out is impractical and provides empirical support for the broader notion that space-time itself may behave as a distributed quantum memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced quantum technologies\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/qute.202500262\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced quantum technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qute.202500262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced quantum technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qute.202500262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
QMM-Enhanced Error Correction: Demonstrating Reversible Imprinting and Retrieval for Robust Quantum Computation
The first hardware evidence is reported that a Quantum Memory Matrix (QMM) - conceived as a Planck-scale lattice of finite-dimensional memory cells - functions as an ultra-shallow, measurement-free error-suppression layer for noisy intermediate-scale quantum processors. On a seven-qubit IBM transmon device, quantum states are imprint onto local cells with single-qubit and nearest-neighbor gates and later retrieve them through a controlled-SWAP, guaranteeing unitary reversibility. A single imprint–retrieval cycle attains a hardware fidelity of ; prepending the same layer to a conventional repetition code boosts the logical fidelity to - a 32 % improvement obtained without additional CX gates. Incorporating the layer into a variational quantum classifier lowers the final training loss by 35 % and halves run-to-run variance, evidencing its value for hybrid quantum-classical workloads. Noise-calibrated simulations further show that stacking three QMM layers brings the logical error rate to within 20 % of a distance-three surface code while using an order of magnitude fewer qubits. Because the QMM booster is fully unitary and eschews mid-circuit measurement, it is directly compatible with platforms where rapid stabilizer read-out is impractical and provides empirical support for the broader notion that space-time itself may behave as a distributed quantum memory.