油棕生产中基于自然的土地管理实践和产量动态:来自印度尼西亚小农种植者的见解

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Kibrom T. Sibhatu, Martin Paul Jr. Tabe-Ojong, Hermanto Siregar
{"title":"油棕生产中基于自然的土地管理实践和产量动态:来自印度尼西亚小农种植者的见解","authors":"Kibrom T. Sibhatu,&nbsp;Martin Paul Jr. Tabe-Ojong,&nbsp;Hermanto Siregar","doi":"10.1111/agec.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nature-based land management (NLM) practices are increasingly promoted for their potential to bridge yield gaps and increase overall crop production. Yet, the extent of NLM adoption, the factors driving it, and its impact on yields remain unknown, particularly among smallholder farmers. This study addresses this knowledge gap using a unique three-round panel dataset from independent smallholder oil palm growers in Indonesia, focusing on three main NLM practices: composting, manual weeding, and organic soil amendments (SA) using lime and gypsum. We employ panel data estimators and a multivariate probit model to examine the yield effects of these practices and assess any potential interdependencies among them. Our findings indicate that the adoption of NLM practices among smallholder growers have been low and inconsistent. We identify several socioeconomic, agricultural, and biophysical factors that contribute to these low and inconsistent adoption rates. Our analysis further reveals little interdependence among the NLM practices, with none displaying a statistically significant positive association with oil palm yields. However, the application of fertilizers and herbicides is associated with higher yields. When we do not control for these yield-increasing inputs, only SA using lime and gypsum shows a positive association with yield gains. Our findings illustrate the complex relationship between NLM practices and oil palm yields among smallholders, shedding light on their potential limitations and challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 5","pages":"713-727"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature-Based Land Management Practices and Yield Dynamics in Oil Palm Production: Insights From Indonesian Smallholder Growers\",\"authors\":\"Kibrom T. Sibhatu,&nbsp;Martin Paul Jr. Tabe-Ojong,&nbsp;Hermanto Siregar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/agec.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nature-based land management (NLM) practices are increasingly promoted for their potential to bridge yield gaps and increase overall crop production. Yet, the extent of NLM adoption, the factors driving it, and its impact on yields remain unknown, particularly among smallholder farmers. This study addresses this knowledge gap using a unique three-round panel dataset from independent smallholder oil palm growers in Indonesia, focusing on three main NLM practices: composting, manual weeding, and organic soil amendments (SA) using lime and gypsum. We employ panel data estimators and a multivariate probit model to examine the yield effects of these practices and assess any potential interdependencies among them. Our findings indicate that the adoption of NLM practices among smallholder growers have been low and inconsistent. We identify several socioeconomic, agricultural, and biophysical factors that contribute to these low and inconsistent adoption rates. Our analysis further reveals little interdependence among the NLM practices, with none displaying a statistically significant positive association with oil palm yields. However, the application of fertilizers and herbicides is associated with higher yields. When we do not control for these yield-increasing inputs, only SA using lime and gypsum shows a positive association with yield gains. Our findings illustrate the complex relationship between NLM practices and oil palm yields among smallholders, shedding light on their potential limitations and challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"713-727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于自然的土地管理(NLM)实践因其弥合产量差距和提高作物总产量的潜力而日益得到推广。然而,NLM的采用程度、驱动因素及其对产量的影响仍然未知,特别是在小农中。本研究利用来自印度尼西亚独立小农油棕种植者的独特三轮面板数据集解决了这一知识差距,重点关注三种主要的NLM实践:堆肥、人工除草和使用石灰和石膏的有机土壤改良剂(SA)。我们采用面板数据估计器和多变量概率模型来检查这些做法的产量影响,并评估它们之间潜在的相互依赖性。我们的研究结果表明,小农种植者采用NLM做法的程度很低,而且不一致。我们确定了几个社会经济、农业和生物物理因素,导致这些低和不一致的采用率。我们的分析进一步揭示了NLM实践之间的相互依赖性很小,没有一个显示出与油棕产量有统计学意义的正相关。然而,化肥和除草剂的施用与更高的产量有关。当我们不控制这些增产投入时,只有使用石灰和石膏的SA与产量增加呈正相关。我们的研究结果说明了NLM实践与小农油棕产量之间的复杂关系,揭示了其潜在的局限性和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nature-Based Land Management Practices and Yield Dynamics in Oil Palm Production: Insights From Indonesian Smallholder Growers

Nature-Based Land Management Practices and Yield Dynamics in Oil Palm Production: Insights From Indonesian Smallholder Growers

Nature-based land management (NLM) practices are increasingly promoted for their potential to bridge yield gaps and increase overall crop production. Yet, the extent of NLM adoption, the factors driving it, and its impact on yields remain unknown, particularly among smallholder farmers. This study addresses this knowledge gap using a unique three-round panel dataset from independent smallholder oil palm growers in Indonesia, focusing on three main NLM practices: composting, manual weeding, and organic soil amendments (SA) using lime and gypsum. We employ panel data estimators and a multivariate probit model to examine the yield effects of these practices and assess any potential interdependencies among them. Our findings indicate that the adoption of NLM practices among smallholder growers have been low and inconsistent. We identify several socioeconomic, agricultural, and biophysical factors that contribute to these low and inconsistent adoption rates. Our analysis further reveals little interdependence among the NLM practices, with none displaying a statistically significant positive association with oil palm yields. However, the application of fertilizers and herbicides is associated with higher yields. When we do not control for these yield-increasing inputs, only SA using lime and gypsum shows a positive association with yield gains. Our findings illustrate the complex relationship between NLM practices and oil palm yields among smallholders, shedding light on their potential limitations and challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信