基于异源增强策略的两种不同类型结核病疫苗免疫原性比较研究

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Xiaochun Wang, Runlin Wang, Jianghong Wang, Zian Zhang, LingYun Kong, Lu Xia, Zhiyang Qi, Haoying Chen
{"title":"基于异源增强策略的两种不同类型结核病疫苗免疫原性比较研究","authors":"Xiaochun Wang,&nbsp;Runlin Wang,&nbsp;Jianghong Wang,&nbsp;Zian Zhang,&nbsp;LingYun Kong,&nbsp;Lu Xia,&nbsp;Zhiyang Qi,&nbsp;Haoying Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00203-025-04463-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>BCG, one of the oldest vaccines in clinical use, has demonstrated well-documented safety, quality, and efficacy in preventing severe forms of tuberculosis (TB) in neonates. However, its protective efficacy declines significantly in adulthood, failing to prevent pulmonary the TB —a major driver of global TB transmission. To address this limitation, this study systematically evaluated two novel BCG-boosting strategies: a recombinant subunit protein vaccine targeting the Rv2074 antigen and a DNA vaccine encoding the same antigen, both evaluated in murine immunization. Antigen-specific cytokine levels in splenocyte supernatants and serum antibody titers were quantified by ELISA after euthanizing mice at 8 weeks (8w) and 16 weeks (16w) post-immunization. The results indicated that both vaccine types induced robust Th1-type immune responses in mice. Additionally, antigen-specific T cell cytokine secretion was analyzed using flow cytometry combined with intracellular cytokine staining. Experimental data revealed that the BCG + P group exhibited a significant increase in CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, while the BCG + D group showed a higher proportion of CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells.Long-term immune effects surpassing short-term outcomes in both groups. These findings suggest that both vaccine types show promise as BCG-based booster vaccines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8279,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Microbiology","volume":"207 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative immunogenicity study of two different types of tuberculosis vaccines based on a heterologous boosting strategy\",\"authors\":\"Xiaochun Wang,&nbsp;Runlin Wang,&nbsp;Jianghong Wang,&nbsp;Zian Zhang,&nbsp;LingYun Kong,&nbsp;Lu Xia,&nbsp;Zhiyang Qi,&nbsp;Haoying Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00203-025-04463-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>BCG, one of the oldest vaccines in clinical use, has demonstrated well-documented safety, quality, and efficacy in preventing severe forms of tuberculosis (TB) in neonates. However, its protective efficacy declines significantly in adulthood, failing to prevent pulmonary the TB —a major driver of global TB transmission. To address this limitation, this study systematically evaluated two novel BCG-boosting strategies: a recombinant subunit protein vaccine targeting the Rv2074 antigen and a DNA vaccine encoding the same antigen, both evaluated in murine immunization. Antigen-specific cytokine levels in splenocyte supernatants and serum antibody titers were quantified by ELISA after euthanizing mice at 8 weeks (8w) and 16 weeks (16w) post-immunization. The results indicated that both vaccine types induced robust Th1-type immune responses in mice. Additionally, antigen-specific T cell cytokine secretion was analyzed using flow cytometry combined with intracellular cytokine staining. Experimental data revealed that the BCG + P group exhibited a significant increase in CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, while the BCG + D group showed a higher proportion of CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells.Long-term immune effects surpassing short-term outcomes in both groups. These findings suggest that both vaccine types show promise as BCG-based booster vaccines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"207 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-025-04463-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-025-04463-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡介苗是临床使用最早的疫苗之一,在预防新生儿重症结核病方面已证明具有充分的安全性、质量和有效性。然而,其保护功效在成年期显著下降,无法预防肺结核——全球结核病传播的主要驱动因素。为了解决这一局限性,本研究系统地评估了两种新的bcg增强策略:一种靶向Rv2074抗原的重组亚单位蛋白疫苗和一种编码相同抗原的DNA疫苗,两者都在小鼠免疫中进行了评估。在免疫后8周(8w)和16周(16w)对小鼠实施安乐死后,采用ELISA法测定小鼠脾细胞上清抗原特异性细胞因子水平和血清抗体滴度。结果表明,两种疫苗均能诱导小鼠产生强大的th1型免疫应答。此外,采用流式细胞术结合细胞内细胞因子染色分析抗原特异性T细胞细胞因子分泌。实验数据显示,BCG + P组CD4+ T细胞显著增加,而BCG + D组CD8+ T细胞比例更高。两组患者的长期免疫效果均优于短期结果。这些发现表明,这两种类型的疫苗都有希望作为基于bcg的加强疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative immunogenicity study of two different types of tuberculosis vaccines based on a heterologous boosting strategy

Comparative immunogenicity study of two different types of tuberculosis vaccines based on a heterologous boosting strategy

Comparative immunogenicity study of two different types of tuberculosis vaccines based on a heterologous boosting strategy

BCG, one of the oldest vaccines in clinical use, has demonstrated well-documented safety, quality, and efficacy in preventing severe forms of tuberculosis (TB) in neonates. However, its protective efficacy declines significantly in adulthood, failing to prevent pulmonary the TB —a major driver of global TB transmission. To address this limitation, this study systematically evaluated two novel BCG-boosting strategies: a recombinant subunit protein vaccine targeting the Rv2074 antigen and a DNA vaccine encoding the same antigen, both evaluated in murine immunization. Antigen-specific cytokine levels in splenocyte supernatants and serum antibody titers were quantified by ELISA after euthanizing mice at 8 weeks (8w) and 16 weeks (16w) post-immunization. The results indicated that both vaccine types induced robust Th1-type immune responses in mice. Additionally, antigen-specific T cell cytokine secretion was analyzed using flow cytometry combined with intracellular cytokine staining. Experimental data revealed that the BCG + P group exhibited a significant increase in CD4+ T cells, while the BCG + D group showed a higher proportion of CD8+ T cells.Long-term immune effects surpassing short-term outcomes in both groups. These findings suggest that both vaccine types show promise as BCG-based booster vaccines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Microbiology
Archives of Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research papers must make a significant and original contribution to microbiology and be of interest to a broad readership. The results of any experimental approach that meets these objectives are welcome, particularly biochemical, molecular genetic, physiological, and/or physical investigations into microbial cells and their interactions with their environments, including their eukaryotic hosts. Mini-reviews in areas of special topical interest and papers on medical microbiology, ecology and systematics, including description of novel taxa, are also published. Theoretical papers and those that report on the analysis or ''mining'' of data are acceptable in principle if new information, interpretations, or hypotheses emerge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信