低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标范围时间和主要不良心血管事件风险:两个队列的汇总分析

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yezhou Liu , Zhe Lv , Hong Yan , Yamei Liu , Jiaheng Zhang , Wenming Bian , Yetong Liu , Zhaojie Song , Peng Han , Tao Chen , Chao Li
{"title":"低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标范围时间和主要不良心血管事件风险:两个队列的汇总分析","authors":"Yezhou Liu ,&nbsp;Zhe Lv ,&nbsp;Hong Yan ,&nbsp;Yamei Liu ,&nbsp;Jiaheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenming Bian ,&nbsp;Yetong Liu ,&nbsp;Zhaojie Song ,&nbsp;Peng Han ,&nbsp;Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Chao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditional management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) relies on single-point measurements, neglecting long-term magnitude and the duration of exposure to elevated LDL-C over time. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LDL-C time in target range (TTR) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in two US cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohorts. LDL-C TTR was defined as the percentage of the area under curve for LDL-C values below 100 mg/dL relative to the total area over the first 4 visits. Association between LDL-C TTR and MACE was estimated using adjusted Cox models and Fine-Gray competing risk models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a mean follow-up of 21.2 ± 8.1 years, 3306 MACE occurred among 16,310 participants. The highest LDL-C TTR quartile was associated with a 25 % reduction in MACE (HR: 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.83), 42 % reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.68), 24 % reduction in stroke (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64 to 0.91), and 13 % reduction in CVD death (HR: 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 1.00; borderline significance). TTR remained significantly associated with MACE after adjusting for mean LDL-C or LDL-C variability, and were robust in competing risk analyses. TTR also outperformed mean LDL-C and LDL-C variability in prognostic value (Akaike information criterion, C-statistics).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LDL-C TTR independently predicts MACE and may offer a more comprehensive assessment of long-term LDL-C control than mean levels or variability, supporting its potential clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101290"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time in LDL cholesterol target range and major adverse cardiovascular events risk: A pooled analysis of two cohorts\",\"authors\":\"Yezhou Liu ,&nbsp;Zhe Lv ,&nbsp;Hong Yan ,&nbsp;Yamei Liu ,&nbsp;Jiaheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenming Bian ,&nbsp;Yetong Liu ,&nbsp;Zhaojie Song ,&nbsp;Peng Han ,&nbsp;Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Chao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditional management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) relies on single-point measurements, neglecting long-term magnitude and the duration of exposure to elevated LDL-C over time. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LDL-C time in target range (TTR) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in two US cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohorts. LDL-C TTR was defined as the percentage of the area under curve for LDL-C values below 100 mg/dL relative to the total area over the first 4 visits. Association between LDL-C TTR and MACE was estimated using adjusted Cox models and Fine-Gray competing risk models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a mean follow-up of 21.2 ± 8.1 years, 3306 MACE occurred among 16,310 participants. The highest LDL-C TTR quartile was associated with a 25 % reduction in MACE (HR: 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.83), 42 % reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.68), 24 % reduction in stroke (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64 to 0.91), and 13 % reduction in CVD death (HR: 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 1.00; borderline significance). TTR remained significantly associated with MACE after adjusting for mean LDL-C or LDL-C variability, and were robust in competing risk analyses. TTR also outperformed mean LDL-C and LDL-C variability in prognostic value (Akaike information criterion, C-statistics).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LDL-C TTR independently predicts MACE and may offer a more comprehensive assessment of long-term LDL-C control than mean levels or variability, supporting its potential clinical utility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725003654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725003654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的传统管理依赖于单点测量,而忽略了长期水平和暴露于高LDL-C的持续时间。本研究旨在评估两个美国队列中LDL-C目标范围内时间(TTR)与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险之间的关系。方法本研究是对社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究和多民族动脉粥样硬化研究(MESA)队列的二次分析。LDL-C TTR定义为LDL-C值低于100 mg/dL的曲线下面积相对于前4次就诊总面积的百分比。使用调整后的Cox模型和Fine-Gray竞争风险模型估计LDL-C TTR与MACE之间的关联。结果在平均21.2±8.1年的随访中,16310名参与者发生了3306例MACE。最高LDL-C TTR四分位数与MACE降低25% (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68至0.83),心肌梗死降低42% (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49至0.68),卒中降低24% (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64至0.91),CVD死亡降低13% (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.76至1.00;临界意义)相关。在调整了平均LDL-C或LDL-C变异性后,TTR仍然与MACE显著相关,并且在竞争风险分析中具有很强的相关性。在预后价值方面,TTR也优于LDL-C均值和LDL-C变异性(Akaike信息标准,c -统计)。结论sldl - c TTR独立预测MACE,并可能提供比平均水平或变异性更全面的长期LDL-C控制评估,支持其潜在的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Time in LDL cholesterol target range and major adverse cardiovascular events risk: A pooled analysis of two cohorts

Time in LDL cholesterol target range and major adverse cardiovascular events risk: A pooled analysis of two cohorts

Background

Traditional management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) relies on single-point measurements, neglecting long-term magnitude and the duration of exposure to elevated LDL-C over time. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LDL-C time in target range (TTR) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in two US cohorts.

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohorts. LDL-C TTR was defined as the percentage of the area under curve for LDL-C values below 100 mg/dL relative to the total area over the first 4 visits. Association between LDL-C TTR and MACE was estimated using adjusted Cox models and Fine-Gray competing risk models.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 21.2 ± 8.1 years, 3306 MACE occurred among 16,310 participants. The highest LDL-C TTR quartile was associated with a 25 % reduction in MACE (HR: 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.83), 42 % reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.68), 24 % reduction in stroke (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64 to 0.91), and 13 % reduction in CVD death (HR: 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 1.00; borderline significance). TTR remained significantly associated with MACE after adjusting for mean LDL-C or LDL-C variability, and were robust in competing risk analyses. TTR also outperformed mean LDL-C and LDL-C variability in prognostic value (Akaike information criterion, C-statistics).

Conclusions

LDL-C TTR independently predicts MACE and may offer a more comprehensive assessment of long-term LDL-C control than mean levels or variability, supporting its potential clinical utility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信