新自由主义危机与城市:与威权主义新自由主义城市主义的角力

IF 4.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Güldem Özatağan, Gareth Fearn, Ayda Eraydin
{"title":"新自由主义危机与城市:与威权主义新自由主义城市主义的角力","authors":"Güldem Özatağan, Gareth Fearn, Ayda Eraydin","doi":"10.1177/00420980251361667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Special Issue presents ‘authoritarian neoliberal urbanism’ as an empirical marker and a concept that signposts the ascendence of a new constellation in which authoritarianism becomes an ever-growing force in our cities in the neoliberal present, not only structuring how urban space is experienced but also repurposing it to reinforce authoritarian legitimacy and consolidate political power. This paper introduces six contributions that empirically or conceptually uncover some of the complexities of this new constellation which have remained untracked, unnarrated and misdiagnosed. We draw on the collective insights from these contributions to posit that authoritarian neoliberal urbanism is neither monolithic nor uniformly oppressive. It adapts to local contexts and conjunctural shifts, is (re)configured through both formal and informal, flexible and rigid, (il)legitimate and illegible governance tools and through complex engagements between the state, market actors and urban populations alike, often in tandem with the state’s continuous effort to (re)secure political legitimacy. Such paradoxes, we suggest, urge taking seriously the variegated, contested, and evolving nature of authoritarian neoliberal urbanism(s) as well as their context-specific and situated contradictions and ambiguities. It is within these contradictions and ambiguities that alternatives to neoliberal continuity may be found and the intensifying slide towards illiberal form(s) of capitalism can be transcended.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoliberal crises and the city: Wrestling with authoritarian neoliberal urbanism(s)\",\"authors\":\"Güldem Özatağan, Gareth Fearn, Ayda Eraydin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00420980251361667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Special Issue presents ‘authoritarian neoliberal urbanism’ as an empirical marker and a concept that signposts the ascendence of a new constellation in which authoritarianism becomes an ever-growing force in our cities in the neoliberal present, not only structuring how urban space is experienced but also repurposing it to reinforce authoritarian legitimacy and consolidate political power. This paper introduces six contributions that empirically or conceptually uncover some of the complexities of this new constellation which have remained untracked, unnarrated and misdiagnosed. We draw on the collective insights from these contributions to posit that authoritarian neoliberal urbanism is neither monolithic nor uniformly oppressive. It adapts to local contexts and conjunctural shifts, is (re)configured through both formal and informal, flexible and rigid, (il)legitimate and illegible governance tools and through complex engagements between the state, market actors and urban populations alike, often in tandem with the state’s continuous effort to (re)secure political legitimacy. Such paradoxes, we suggest, urge taking seriously the variegated, contested, and evolving nature of authoritarian neoliberal urbanism(s) as well as their context-specific and situated contradictions and ambiguities. It is within these contradictions and ambiguities that alternatives to neoliberal continuity may be found and the intensifying slide towards illiberal form(s) of capitalism can be transcended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Studies\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251361667\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251361667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊将“威权主义的新自由主义城市主义”作为一个经验标记和一个概念,它标志着一个新的星座的优势,在这个星座中,威权主义在新自由主义的当下成为我们城市中不断增长的力量,不仅构建了城市空间的体验方式,而且还重新利用它来加强威权主义的合法性和巩固政治权力。本文介绍了六个贡献,经验或概念上揭示了这个新星座的一些复杂性,这些复杂性仍然未被追踪,未被叙述和误诊。我们从这些贡献中汲取集体见解,假设威权主义的新自由主义城市主义既不是单一的,也不是统一的压迫。它适应当地环境和形势变化,通过正式和非正式、灵活和僵化、合法和难以辨认的治理工具以及国家、市场参与者和城市人口之间的复杂接触(重新)配置,通常与国家(重新)确保政治合法性的持续努力相结合。我们认为,这些悖论敦促我们认真对待威权主义新自由主义城市主义的多样性、争议性和不断演变的本质,以及它们在特定环境下的矛盾和模糊性。正是在这些矛盾和模糊之中,可以找到替代新自由主义连续性的选择,并且可以超越资本主义向非自由形式的日益加剧的下滑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoliberal crises and the city: Wrestling with authoritarian neoliberal urbanism(s)
This Special Issue presents ‘authoritarian neoliberal urbanism’ as an empirical marker and a concept that signposts the ascendence of a new constellation in which authoritarianism becomes an ever-growing force in our cities in the neoliberal present, not only structuring how urban space is experienced but also repurposing it to reinforce authoritarian legitimacy and consolidate political power. This paper introduces six contributions that empirically or conceptually uncover some of the complexities of this new constellation which have remained untracked, unnarrated and misdiagnosed. We draw on the collective insights from these contributions to posit that authoritarian neoliberal urbanism is neither monolithic nor uniformly oppressive. It adapts to local contexts and conjunctural shifts, is (re)configured through both formal and informal, flexible and rigid, (il)legitimate and illegible governance tools and through complex engagements between the state, market actors and urban populations alike, often in tandem with the state’s continuous effort to (re)secure political legitimacy. Such paradoxes, we suggest, urge taking seriously the variegated, contested, and evolving nature of authoritarian neoliberal urbanism(s) as well as their context-specific and situated contradictions and ambiguities. It is within these contradictions and ambiguities that alternatives to neoliberal continuity may be found and the intensifying slide towards illiberal form(s) of capitalism can be transcended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信