{"title":"从流行心理学到第二语言教育学:“让他们去吧”理论作为应用语言学的反思框架","authors":"Sophia Strietholt, Elena Petron","doi":"10.1093/applin/amaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the potential relevance of Mel Robbins’ Let Them Theory (LTT), a popular self-help concept, to applied linguistics. LTT encourages individuals to shift focus from external judgments to their own needs and well-being. While not a substitute for established theory, LTT can serve as a source of pedagogical and theoretical inspiration. Despite its lack of empirical grounding, LTT offers an unconventional path for addressing a key paradox in second language learning: learners must remain resilient amid discouragement from others, while also relying on others in their learning process. Drawing on anecdotes and theoretical connections, this commentary considers the value of incorporating frameworks like LTT into language pedagogy. We situate this piece within broader discussions of accessibility in applied linguistics and the persistent theory-practice divide, arguing that concise frameworks can help bridge that gap. Rather than dismissing popular psychology, we suggest that applied linguists treat such concepts as generative tools for pedagogical reflection and theoretical exploration. We conclude by calling for more inquiry into the role of non-academic frameworks in language education.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From pop psychology to L2 pedagogy: The ‘Let Them Theory’ as a reflective frame in applied linguistics\",\"authors\":\"Sophia Strietholt, Elena Petron\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/applin/amaf058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the potential relevance of Mel Robbins’ Let Them Theory (LTT), a popular self-help concept, to applied linguistics. LTT encourages individuals to shift focus from external judgments to their own needs and well-being. While not a substitute for established theory, LTT can serve as a source of pedagogical and theoretical inspiration. Despite its lack of empirical grounding, LTT offers an unconventional path for addressing a key paradox in second language learning: learners must remain resilient amid discouragement from others, while also relying on others in their learning process. Drawing on anecdotes and theoretical connections, this commentary considers the value of incorporating frameworks like LTT into language pedagogy. We situate this piece within broader discussions of accessibility in applied linguistics and the persistent theory-practice divide, arguing that concise frameworks can help bridge that gap. Rather than dismissing popular psychology, we suggest that applied linguists treat such concepts as generative tools for pedagogical reflection and theoretical exploration. We conclude by calling for more inquiry into the role of non-academic frameworks in language education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf058\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了梅尔·罗宾斯的Let Them Theory (LTT)——一个流行的自助概念——与应用语言学的潜在关联。LTT鼓励个人将注意力从外部判断转移到自己的需求和幸福上。虽然不能替代现有的理论,但LTT可以作为教学和理论灵感的来源。尽管LTT缺乏经验基础,但它为解决第二语言学习中的一个关键悖论提供了一条非常规的途径:学习者必须在他人的挫折中保持弹性,同时在学习过程中也要依赖他人。通过轶事和理论联系,这篇评论考虑了将LTT这样的框架纳入语言教育学的价值。我们将这篇文章置于应用语言学中更广泛的可访问性讨论和持续的理论-实践鸿沟中,认为简洁的框架可以帮助弥合这一差距。我们建议应用语言学家将这些概念视为教学反思和理论探索的生成工具,而不是忽视流行心理学。最后,我们呼吁对非学术框架在语言教育中的作用进行更多的研究。
From pop psychology to L2 pedagogy: The ‘Let Them Theory’ as a reflective frame in applied linguistics
This article explores the potential relevance of Mel Robbins’ Let Them Theory (LTT), a popular self-help concept, to applied linguistics. LTT encourages individuals to shift focus from external judgments to their own needs and well-being. While not a substitute for established theory, LTT can serve as a source of pedagogical and theoretical inspiration. Despite its lack of empirical grounding, LTT offers an unconventional path for addressing a key paradox in second language learning: learners must remain resilient amid discouragement from others, while also relying on others in their learning process. Drawing on anecdotes and theoretical connections, this commentary considers the value of incorporating frameworks like LTT into language pedagogy. We situate this piece within broader discussions of accessibility in applied linguistics and the persistent theory-practice divide, arguing that concise frameworks can help bridge that gap. Rather than dismissing popular psychology, we suggest that applied linguists treat such concepts as generative tools for pedagogical reflection and theoretical exploration. We conclude by calling for more inquiry into the role of non-academic frameworks in language education.
期刊介绍:
Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.