一项混合方法研究表征美国护理人员对儿童车辆中暑干预的态度。

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jalaj Maheshwari, Kristina B Metzger, Emma Sartin
{"title":"一项混合方法研究表征美国护理人员对儿童车辆中暑干预的态度。","authors":"Jalaj Maheshwari, Kristina B Metzger, Emma Sartin","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several behavioral and technological approaches have been proposed to help prevent pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH), or children overheating in cars. While studies have examined technologies' efficacy in controlled settings, it remains unclear how end-users feel about adopting behavioral/technological interventions for use in the real-world. Thus, this study's objective was to characterize caregivers' attitudes toward available PVH interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national survey and focus groups with caregivers of children less than 5 years old. Both studies gathered caregivers' demographics, as well as their opinions about adopting/using broad and specific types of behavioral and technological interventions for PVH. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics; focus groups were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,500 survey respondents and 4 focus groups (16 participants total). Participants across studies shared similar interests in and generally positive opinions toward behavioral and technological PVH interventions, with caveats. A selection of survey findings include: (1) 90% of respondents were <i>Somewhat</i> or <i>Extremely Willing</i> to use technology that would remind them/warn them if they had left a child, (2) 58-64% would use Vehicle-based warning systems (e.g., occupant detection sensor + horn), Car seat-based warning systems (e.g., child detection sensor + siren), or Vehicle-based reminder technology (e.g., trip-based message or chime), and (3) 11% would not use any technology. Focus groups agreed generally with respondents in the survey, expanding results to state more caregivers should be aware of behavioral interventions and to raise concerns about some interventions' ease of use, amount of effort required, risk of malfunction or lack of effectiveness, maintenance, and potential cost. For example, caregivers with rear-seat check reminders believed that chimes and dash messages may be ineffective in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The knowledge gained from this study can help to prioritize future PVH intervention efforts and enhance effectiveness among emerging approaches, along with informing how stakeholders may improve consumer awareness, adoption, and rates of correct usages. Based on our findings, this paper will inform ways to bolster caregivers' engagement with behavioral approaches and simultaneous use of effective and accessible technological interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods study characterizing US caregivers' attitudes toward pediatric vehicular heatstroke interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Jalaj Maheshwari, Kristina B Metzger, Emma Sartin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several behavioral and technological approaches have been proposed to help prevent pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH), or children overheating in cars. While studies have examined technologies' efficacy in controlled settings, it remains unclear how end-users feel about adopting behavioral/technological interventions for use in the real-world. Thus, this study's objective was to characterize caregivers' attitudes toward available PVH interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national survey and focus groups with caregivers of children less than 5 years old. Both studies gathered caregivers' demographics, as well as their opinions about adopting/using broad and specific types of behavioral and technological interventions for PVH. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics; focus groups were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,500 survey respondents and 4 focus groups (16 participants total). Participants across studies shared similar interests in and generally positive opinions toward behavioral and technological PVH interventions, with caveats. A selection of survey findings include: (1) 90% of respondents were <i>Somewhat</i> or <i>Extremely Willing</i> to use technology that would remind them/warn them if they had left a child, (2) 58-64% would use Vehicle-based warning systems (e.g., occupant detection sensor + horn), Car seat-based warning systems (e.g., child detection sensor + siren), or Vehicle-based reminder technology (e.g., trip-based message or chime), and (3) 11% would not use any technology. Focus groups agreed generally with respondents in the survey, expanding results to state more caregivers should be aware of behavioral interventions and to raise concerns about some interventions' ease of use, amount of effort required, risk of malfunction or lack of effectiveness, maintenance, and potential cost. For example, caregivers with rear-seat check reminders believed that chimes and dash messages may be ineffective in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The knowledge gained from this study can help to prioritize future PVH intervention efforts and enhance effectiveness among emerging approaches, along with informing how stakeholders may improve consumer awareness, adoption, and rates of correct usages. Based on our findings, this paper will inform ways to bolster caregivers' engagement with behavioral approaches and simultaneous use of effective and accessible technological interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提出了几种行为和技术方法来帮助预防儿童车辆中暑(PVH)或儿童在汽车中过热。虽然研究已经检验了技术在受控环境中的有效性,但最终用户对在现实世界中采用行为/技术干预措施的感受仍不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是表征护理人员对可用的PVH干预措施的态度。方法:我们对5岁以下儿童的照顾者进行了全国调查和焦点小组调查。两项研究都收集了护理人员的人口统计数据,以及他们对采用/使用广泛和特定类型的行为和技术干预PVH的意见。用描述性统计对调查结果进行分析;焦点小组分析使用扎根理论方法定性数据。结果:共有1500名调查对象和4个焦点小组(共16人)。研究参与者对行为和技术PVH干预有相似的兴趣和普遍的积极看法,但有警告。调查结果的选择包括:(1)90%的受访者有点或非常愿意使用技术来提醒他们/警告他们,如果他们离开了孩子,(2)58-64%的受访者会使用基于车辆的警告系统(例如,乘员检测传感器+喇叭),汽车座椅的警告系统(例如,儿童检测传感器+警报器),或基于车辆的提醒技术(例如,基于旅行的信息或钟声),(3)11%不会使用任何技术。焦点小组普遍同意调查中的受访者,扩大结果,说明更多的护理人员应该意识到行为干预措施,并提出对一些干预措施的易用性、所需的工作量、故障或缺乏有效性的风险、维护和潜在成本的担忧。例如,有后座检查提醒的护理人员认为,从长远来看,铃声和破折号信息可能是无效的。结论:从本研究中获得的知识可以帮助确定未来PVH干预工作的优先顺序,并提高新兴方法的有效性,同时告知利益相关者如何提高消费者的意识、采用率和正确使用率。根据我们的研究结果,本文将告知如何通过行为方法和同时使用有效和可获得的技术干预措施来加强护理人员的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-methods study characterizing US caregivers' attitudes toward pediatric vehicular heatstroke interventions.

Objective: Several behavioral and technological approaches have been proposed to help prevent pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH), or children overheating in cars. While studies have examined technologies' efficacy in controlled settings, it remains unclear how end-users feel about adopting behavioral/technological interventions for use in the real-world. Thus, this study's objective was to characterize caregivers' attitudes toward available PVH interventions.

Methods: We conducted a national survey and focus groups with caregivers of children less than 5 years old. Both studies gathered caregivers' demographics, as well as their opinions about adopting/using broad and specific types of behavioral and technological interventions for PVH. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics; focus groups were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to qualitative data.

Results: There were 1,500 survey respondents and 4 focus groups (16 participants total). Participants across studies shared similar interests in and generally positive opinions toward behavioral and technological PVH interventions, with caveats. A selection of survey findings include: (1) 90% of respondents were Somewhat or Extremely Willing to use technology that would remind them/warn them if they had left a child, (2) 58-64% would use Vehicle-based warning systems (e.g., occupant detection sensor + horn), Car seat-based warning systems (e.g., child detection sensor + siren), or Vehicle-based reminder technology (e.g., trip-based message or chime), and (3) 11% would not use any technology. Focus groups agreed generally with respondents in the survey, expanding results to state more caregivers should be aware of behavioral interventions and to raise concerns about some interventions' ease of use, amount of effort required, risk of malfunction or lack of effectiveness, maintenance, and potential cost. For example, caregivers with rear-seat check reminders believed that chimes and dash messages may be ineffective in the long-term.

Conclusions: The knowledge gained from this study can help to prioritize future PVH intervention efforts and enhance effectiveness among emerging approaches, along with informing how stakeholders may improve consumer awareness, adoption, and rates of correct usages. Based on our findings, this paper will inform ways to bolster caregivers' engagement with behavioral approaches and simultaneous use of effective and accessible technological interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信