{"title":"一项混合方法研究表征美国护理人员对儿童车辆中暑干预的态度。","authors":"Jalaj Maheshwari, Kristina B Metzger, Emma Sartin","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several behavioral and technological approaches have been proposed to help prevent pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH), or children overheating in cars. While studies have examined technologies' efficacy in controlled settings, it remains unclear how end-users feel about adopting behavioral/technological interventions for use in the real-world. Thus, this study's objective was to characterize caregivers' attitudes toward available PVH interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national survey and focus groups with caregivers of children less than 5 years old. Both studies gathered caregivers' demographics, as well as their opinions about adopting/using broad and specific types of behavioral and technological interventions for PVH. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics; focus groups were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,500 survey respondents and 4 focus groups (16 participants total). Participants across studies shared similar interests in and generally positive opinions toward behavioral and technological PVH interventions, with caveats. A selection of survey findings include: (1) 90% of respondents were <i>Somewhat</i> or <i>Extremely Willing</i> to use technology that would remind them/warn them if they had left a child, (2) 58-64% would use Vehicle-based warning systems (e.g., occupant detection sensor + horn), Car seat-based warning systems (e.g., child detection sensor + siren), or Vehicle-based reminder technology (e.g., trip-based message or chime), and (3) 11% would not use any technology. Focus groups agreed generally with respondents in the survey, expanding results to state more caregivers should be aware of behavioral interventions and to raise concerns about some interventions' ease of use, amount of effort required, risk of malfunction or lack of effectiveness, maintenance, and potential cost. For example, caregivers with rear-seat check reminders believed that chimes and dash messages may be ineffective in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The knowledge gained from this study can help to prioritize future PVH intervention efforts and enhance effectiveness among emerging approaches, along with informing how stakeholders may improve consumer awareness, adoption, and rates of correct usages. Based on our findings, this paper will inform ways to bolster caregivers' engagement with behavioral approaches and simultaneous use of effective and accessible technological interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods study characterizing US caregivers' attitudes toward pediatric vehicular heatstroke interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Jalaj Maheshwari, Kristina B Metzger, Emma Sartin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several behavioral and technological approaches have been proposed to help prevent pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH), or children overheating in cars. While studies have examined technologies' efficacy in controlled settings, it remains unclear how end-users feel about adopting behavioral/technological interventions for use in the real-world. Thus, this study's objective was to characterize caregivers' attitudes toward available PVH interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national survey and focus groups with caregivers of children less than 5 years old. Both studies gathered caregivers' demographics, as well as their opinions about adopting/using broad and specific types of behavioral and technological interventions for PVH. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics; focus groups were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,500 survey respondents and 4 focus groups (16 participants total). Participants across studies shared similar interests in and generally positive opinions toward behavioral and technological PVH interventions, with caveats. A selection of survey findings include: (1) 90% of respondents were <i>Somewhat</i> or <i>Extremely Willing</i> to use technology that would remind them/warn them if they had left a child, (2) 58-64% would use Vehicle-based warning systems (e.g., occupant detection sensor + horn), Car seat-based warning systems (e.g., child detection sensor + siren), or Vehicle-based reminder technology (e.g., trip-based message or chime), and (3) 11% would not use any technology. Focus groups agreed generally with respondents in the survey, expanding results to state more caregivers should be aware of behavioral interventions and to raise concerns about some interventions' ease of use, amount of effort required, risk of malfunction or lack of effectiveness, maintenance, and potential cost. For example, caregivers with rear-seat check reminders believed that chimes and dash messages may be ineffective in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The knowledge gained from this study can help to prioritize future PVH intervention efforts and enhance effectiveness among emerging approaches, along with informing how stakeholders may improve consumer awareness, adoption, and rates of correct usages. Based on our findings, this paper will inform ways to bolster caregivers' engagement with behavioral approaches and simultaneous use of effective and accessible technological interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2537155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A mixed-methods study characterizing US caregivers' attitudes toward pediatric vehicular heatstroke interventions.
Objective: Several behavioral and technological approaches have been proposed to help prevent pediatric vehicular heatstroke (PVH), or children overheating in cars. While studies have examined technologies' efficacy in controlled settings, it remains unclear how end-users feel about adopting behavioral/technological interventions for use in the real-world. Thus, this study's objective was to characterize caregivers' attitudes toward available PVH interventions.
Methods: We conducted a national survey and focus groups with caregivers of children less than 5 years old. Both studies gathered caregivers' demographics, as well as their opinions about adopting/using broad and specific types of behavioral and technological interventions for PVH. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics; focus groups were analyzed using a grounded theory approach to qualitative data.
Results: There were 1,500 survey respondents and 4 focus groups (16 participants total). Participants across studies shared similar interests in and generally positive opinions toward behavioral and technological PVH interventions, with caveats. A selection of survey findings include: (1) 90% of respondents were Somewhat or Extremely Willing to use technology that would remind them/warn them if they had left a child, (2) 58-64% would use Vehicle-based warning systems (e.g., occupant detection sensor + horn), Car seat-based warning systems (e.g., child detection sensor + siren), or Vehicle-based reminder technology (e.g., trip-based message or chime), and (3) 11% would not use any technology. Focus groups agreed generally with respondents in the survey, expanding results to state more caregivers should be aware of behavioral interventions and to raise concerns about some interventions' ease of use, amount of effort required, risk of malfunction or lack of effectiveness, maintenance, and potential cost. For example, caregivers with rear-seat check reminders believed that chimes and dash messages may be ineffective in the long-term.
Conclusions: The knowledge gained from this study can help to prioritize future PVH intervention efforts and enhance effectiveness among emerging approaches, along with informing how stakeholders may improve consumer awareness, adoption, and rates of correct usages. Based on our findings, this paper will inform ways to bolster caregivers' engagement with behavioral approaches and simultaneous use of effective and accessible technological interventions.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment.
General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.