【S3指南“足月顺产”的介绍——产时胎儿监测发生了什么变化?】]

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rebecca Felicitas Adams, Sven Schiermeier
{"title":"【S3指南“足月顺产”的介绍——产时胎儿监测发生了什么变化?】]","authors":"Rebecca Felicitas Adams, Sven Schiermeier","doi":"10.1055/a-2678-7980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subpartum fetal monitoring is a debated topic in obstetrics. Studies have shown that CTG monitoring can lead to not always necessary interventions such as C-sections and vaginal-operative deliveries. Therefore, the 2021 AWMF S3 guideline \"Vaginal Birth at Term\" recommends structured intermittent auscultation instead of CTG monitoring in low-risk pregnancies for the first time.In a retrospective cross-sectional study, all German maternity clinics (n=616) were asked using an online questionnaire whether they use intermittent auscultation for low-risk pregnancies as well as reasons for and against it. The response rate was 16% (n=96). RESULTS:  22% (n=21) of clinics reported using intermittent auscultation always or sometimes. A significant correlation was found if changes had occurred and the application of intermittent auscultation (X2=12.95, df=2, p=0.001). Other factors such as the availability of one-to-one care (>95%), midwife-led delivery rooms, and differentiation between high- and low-risk pregnancies had no significant influence on the use of intermittent auscultation.The guideline has not led to the use of intermittent auscultation for monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Clear low-risk definition, one-to-one care, qualified staff and updated studies on intermittent auscultation vs. CTG are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Introduction of the S3 guideline \\\"Vaginal Birth at Term\\\" - What has changed in intrapartum fetal monitoring?]\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Felicitas Adams, Sven Schiermeier\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2678-7980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subpartum fetal monitoring is a debated topic in obstetrics. Studies have shown that CTG monitoring can lead to not always necessary interventions such as C-sections and vaginal-operative deliveries. Therefore, the 2021 AWMF S3 guideline \\\"Vaginal Birth at Term\\\" recommends structured intermittent auscultation instead of CTG monitoring in low-risk pregnancies for the first time.In a retrospective cross-sectional study, all German maternity clinics (n=616) were asked using an online questionnaire whether they use intermittent auscultation for low-risk pregnancies as well as reasons for and against it. The response rate was 16% (n=96). RESULTS:  22% (n=21) of clinics reported using intermittent auscultation always or sometimes. A significant correlation was found if changes had occurred and the application of intermittent auscultation (X2=12.95, df=2, p=0.001). Other factors such as the availability of one-to-one care (>95%), midwife-led delivery rooms, and differentiation between high- and low-risk pregnancies had no significant influence on the use of intermittent auscultation.The guideline has not led to the use of intermittent auscultation for monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Clear low-risk definition, one-to-one care, qualified staff and updated studies on intermittent auscultation vs. CTG are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2678-7980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2678-7980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产后胎儿监护是产科学中一个有争议的话题。研究表明,CTG监测可能导致不一定必要的干预措施,如剖腹产和阴道手术分娩。因此,2021年AWMF S3指南“足月阴道分娩”首次建议在低风险妊娠中采用结构化间歇听诊而不是CTG监测。在一项回顾性横断面研究中,使用在线问卷询问所有德国产科诊所(n=616)他们是否对低风险妊娠使用间歇听诊,以及支持和反对的原因。有效率为16% (n=96)。结果:22% (n=21)的诊所报告经常或有时使用间歇听诊。如果发生改变与间歇听诊的应用存在显著相关性(X2=12.95, df=2, p=0.001)。其他因素,如一对一护理的可获得性(>95%)、助产士主导的产房以及高风险和低风险妊娠的区分,对间歇性听诊的使用没有显著影响。该指南并未建议在低风险妊娠中使用间歇听诊进行监测。需要明确的低风险定义,一对一护理,合格的工作人员和间歇性听诊与CTG的最新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Introduction of the S3 guideline "Vaginal Birth at Term" - What has changed in intrapartum fetal monitoring?]

Subpartum fetal monitoring is a debated topic in obstetrics. Studies have shown that CTG monitoring can lead to not always necessary interventions such as C-sections and vaginal-operative deliveries. Therefore, the 2021 AWMF S3 guideline "Vaginal Birth at Term" recommends structured intermittent auscultation instead of CTG monitoring in low-risk pregnancies for the first time.In a retrospective cross-sectional study, all German maternity clinics (n=616) were asked using an online questionnaire whether they use intermittent auscultation for low-risk pregnancies as well as reasons for and against it. The response rate was 16% (n=96). RESULTS:  22% (n=21) of clinics reported using intermittent auscultation always or sometimes. A significant correlation was found if changes had occurred and the application of intermittent auscultation (X2=12.95, df=2, p=0.001). Other factors such as the availability of one-to-one care (>95%), midwife-led delivery rooms, and differentiation between high- and low-risk pregnancies had no significant influence on the use of intermittent auscultation.The guideline has not led to the use of intermittent auscultation for monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Clear low-risk definition, one-to-one care, qualified staff and updated studies on intermittent auscultation vs. CTG are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信