参考基线对头颅CT检查中大小特异性剂量估计(SSDE)的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Huanna Meng, Qingting Sun, Yihan Fan, Yuhao Zhao, Jing Wang, Lingling Wang, Baohui Liang
{"title":"参考基线对头颅CT检查中大小特异性剂量估计(SSDE)的影响。","authors":"Huanna Meng, Qingting Sun, Yihan Fan, Yuhao Zhao, Jing Wang, Lingling Wang, Baohui Liang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ae064f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of three reference baselines-specifically, supraorbitometal baseline (SOML), orbitometal baseline (OMBL), and Reid's baseline (RBL) on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head computed tomography (CT), addressing limitations of conventional dose metrics that neglect baseline-dependent anatomical variations. Experiments were performed on a GE LightSpeed VCT scanner. The positioning of the head phantom corresponding to the SOML, OMBL, and RBL baselines was achieved by tilting the CT gantry and elevating the phantom. Using automatic tube current modulation, 48 imaging datasets were acquired through both axial and helical scans. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were employed to measure the eye lens dose. The SSDE(<i>z</i>) was calculated for each slice, with the central slice SSDE values denoted as SSDEcen. The volume-averaged SSDE (SSDEgro) was derived by weighted integration of the former, enabling comparative analysis of radiation dose parameters across groups. In both axial and helical scanning modes, the SOML group demonstrated lower CTDI<sub>vol</sub>(<i>a</i>), SSDEcen, and SSDEgro compared to the OMBL and RBL group. When the gantry tilted along SOML, SSDEgro values reduced by 20.67% (vs. RBL-phantom elevation) to 32.19% (vs. OMBL-gantry tilt). Within a single scan, SSDEgro values were consistently less than the corresponding CTDI<sub>vol</sub>(<i>a</i>), with a maximum reduction of 10.71%. Additionally, TLD measurements revealed that the eye lens radiation dose varied between 47.48 and 87.91 mGy, with the lowest dose (47.48 mGy) achieved in SOML-based axial scans using gantry tilt. This study demonstrates that the choice of reference baseline influences SSDE values in head CT imaging. Furthermore, SSDE effectively corrects the overestimation of the actual radiation dose by CTDI<sub>vol</sub>. Based on the findings, we recommend adopting the SOML as the reference baseline in clinical practice, which reduces radiation exposure during head CT examinations and optimises ocular radiation protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of reference baselines on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head CT examinations.\",\"authors\":\"Huanna Meng, Qingting Sun, Yihan Fan, Yuhao Zhao, Jing Wang, Lingling Wang, Baohui Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6498/ae064f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of three reference baselines-specifically, supraorbitometal baseline (SOML), orbitometal baseline (OMBL), and Reid's baseline (RBL) on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head computed tomography (CT), addressing limitations of conventional dose metrics that neglect baseline-dependent anatomical variations. Experiments were performed on a GE LightSpeed VCT scanner. The positioning of the head phantom corresponding to the SOML, OMBL, and RBL baselines was achieved by tilting the CT gantry and elevating the phantom. Using automatic tube current modulation, 48 imaging datasets were acquired through both axial and helical scans. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were employed to measure the eye lens dose. The SSDE(<i>z</i>) was calculated for each slice, with the central slice SSDE values denoted as SSDEcen. The volume-averaged SSDE (SSDEgro) was derived by weighted integration of the former, enabling comparative analysis of radiation dose parameters across groups. In both axial and helical scanning modes, the SOML group demonstrated lower CTDI<sub>vol</sub>(<i>a</i>), SSDEcen, and SSDEgro compared to the OMBL and RBL group. When the gantry tilted along SOML, SSDEgro values reduced by 20.67% (vs. RBL-phantom elevation) to 32.19% (vs. OMBL-gantry tilt). Within a single scan, SSDEgro values were consistently less than the corresponding CTDI<sub>vol</sub>(<i>a</i>), with a maximum reduction of 10.71%. Additionally, TLD measurements revealed that the eye lens radiation dose varied between 47.48 and 87.91 mGy, with the lowest dose (47.48 mGy) achieved in SOML-based axial scans using gantry tilt. This study demonstrates that the choice of reference baseline influences SSDE values in head CT imaging. Furthermore, SSDE effectively corrects the overestimation of the actual radiation dose by CTDI<sub>vol</sub>. Based on the findings, we recommend adopting the SOML as the reference baseline in clinical practice, which reduces radiation exposure during head CT examinations and optimises ocular radiation protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiological Protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiological Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae064f\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae064f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估三个参考基线-眶金属上基线(SOML),眶金属基线(OMBL)和里德基线(RBL)对头部CT尺寸特异性剂量估计(SSDE)的影响,解决传统剂量指标忽视基线依赖的解剖变化的局限性。方法:在GE LightSpeed VCT扫描仪上进行实验。通过倾斜CT机架和抬高脑假体,实现脑假体与SOML、OMBL和RBL基线相对应的定位。采用自动管电流调制(ATCM),通过轴向和螺旋扫描获得48个成像数据集。采用热释光剂量计(TLDs)测量眼球晶状体剂量。计算每个切片的SSDE(z),中心切片的SSDE值记为SSDEcen。体积平均SSDE (SSDEgro)通过前者的加权积分得到,从而可以对各组间的辐射剂量参数进行比较分析。 ;结果:在轴向和螺旋扫描模式下,与OMBL和RBL组相比,SOML组表现出更低的CTDIvol(a), SSDEcen和SSDEgro。当龙门架沿SOML倾斜时,SSDEgro值降低20.67%(与rbl -幻影俯仰相比)至32.19%(与ombl -龙门架倾斜相比)。在单次扫描中,SSDEgro值始终小于相应的CTDIvol(a),最大降幅为10.71%。此外,TLD测量显示,眼晶状体辐射剂量在47.48和87.91 mGy之间变化,最低剂量(47.48 mGy)是基于soml的轴向扫描,使用龙门倾斜。结论:本研究表明,参考基线的选择影响头部CT成像的SSDE值。此外,SSDE有效地纠正了CTDIvol对实际辐射剂量的高估。基于此,我们建议在临床实践中采用SOML作为参考基线,以减少头部CT检查时的辐射暴露,优化眼部辐射保护。 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of reference baselines on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head CT examinations.

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of three reference baselines-specifically, supraorbitometal baseline (SOML), orbitometal baseline (OMBL), and Reid's baseline (RBL) on size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head computed tomography (CT), addressing limitations of conventional dose metrics that neglect baseline-dependent anatomical variations. Experiments were performed on a GE LightSpeed VCT scanner. The positioning of the head phantom corresponding to the SOML, OMBL, and RBL baselines was achieved by tilting the CT gantry and elevating the phantom. Using automatic tube current modulation, 48 imaging datasets were acquired through both axial and helical scans. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were employed to measure the eye lens dose. The SSDE(z) was calculated for each slice, with the central slice SSDE values denoted as SSDEcen. The volume-averaged SSDE (SSDEgro) was derived by weighted integration of the former, enabling comparative analysis of radiation dose parameters across groups. In both axial and helical scanning modes, the SOML group demonstrated lower CTDIvol(a), SSDEcen, and SSDEgro compared to the OMBL and RBL group. When the gantry tilted along SOML, SSDEgro values reduced by 20.67% (vs. RBL-phantom elevation) to 32.19% (vs. OMBL-gantry tilt). Within a single scan, SSDEgro values were consistently less than the corresponding CTDIvol(a), with a maximum reduction of 10.71%. Additionally, TLD measurements revealed that the eye lens radiation dose varied between 47.48 and 87.91 mGy, with the lowest dose (47.48 mGy) achieved in SOML-based axial scans using gantry tilt. This study demonstrates that the choice of reference baseline influences SSDE values in head CT imaging. Furthermore, SSDE effectively corrects the overestimation of the actual radiation dose by CTDIvol. Based on the findings, we recommend adopting the SOML as the reference baseline in clinical practice, which reduces radiation exposure during head CT examinations and optimises ocular radiation protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信