球囊导管用于血管内取栓:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hongyu Ma, Yu Gao, Manyue Ge, Guojie Chen, Xiaoxi Zhang, Hongye Xu, Zifu Li, Yu Zhou, Pengfei Yang, Jianmin Liu
{"title":"球囊导管用于血管内取栓:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hongyu Ma, Yu Gao, Manyue Ge, Guojie Chen, Xiaoxi Zhang, Hongye Xu, Zifu Li, Yu Zhou, Pengfei Yang, Jianmin Liu","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2556246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Whether temporary blood flow arrest using balloon guide catheters (BGC) facilitates endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BGC utilization during thrombectomy for AIS-LVO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 1 June 2025, for studies evaluating BGC in AIS-LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy. Eligibility screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 431 articles identified, two randomized trials involving 460 patients met the inclusion criteria, in which 230 patients received thrombectomy with blood flow arrest using BGC, and 230 patients without flow arrest. Compared with the nonflow arrest group, the flow arrest group showed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence (34.78% vs. 37.83%; odds ratio[OR], 0.88 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.28]; <i>p</i> = 0.50), rates of eTICI 2c-3 at the end of the procedure (77.39% vs. 78.26%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.61-1.48]; <i>p</i> = 0.83), or emboli to new territory (3.04% vs. 6.09%; OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.04-3.58]; <i>p</i> = 0.41). Safety outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Temporary blood flow arrest with BGC did not significantly improve the functional independence in patients receiving thrombectomy for AIS-LVO. This technique remains a subject for future studies to confirm its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balloon guide catheters for endovascular thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Ma, Yu Gao, Manyue Ge, Guojie Chen, Xiaoxi Zhang, Hongye Xu, Zifu Li, Yu Zhou, Pengfei Yang, Jianmin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01616412.2025.2556246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Whether temporary blood flow arrest using balloon guide catheters (BGC) facilitates endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BGC utilization during thrombectomy for AIS-LVO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 1 June 2025, for studies evaluating BGC in AIS-LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy. Eligibility screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 431 articles identified, two randomized trials involving 460 patients met the inclusion criteria, in which 230 patients received thrombectomy with blood flow arrest using BGC, and 230 patients without flow arrest. Compared with the nonflow arrest group, the flow arrest group showed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence (34.78% vs. 37.83%; odds ratio[OR], 0.88 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.28]; <i>p</i> = 0.50), rates of eTICI 2c-3 at the end of the procedure (77.39% vs. 78.26%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.61-1.48]; <i>p</i> = 0.83), or emboli to new territory (3.04% vs. 6.09%; OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.04-3.58]; <i>p</i> = 0.41). Safety outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Temporary blood flow arrest with BGC did not significantly improve the functional independence in patients receiving thrombectomy for AIS-LVO. This technique remains a subject for future studies to confirm its efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2556246\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2556246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大血管闭塞急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS-LVO)患者采用球囊引导导管(BGC)暂时停血是否有利于血管内取栓尚存争议。我们进行了一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以评估在AIS-LVO取栓期间使用BGC的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Elsevier和Web of Science数据库,从成立到2025年6月1日,对行血栓切除术的AIS-LVO患者进行BGC评估的研究。资格筛选和数据提取由两名研究者按照PRISMA指南独立进行。主要终点是90天的功能独立性,定义为修改的Rankin量表(mRS)评分0-2。结果:在纳入的431篇文章中,有两项随机试验涉及460例患者,符合纳入标准,其中230例患者采用BGC取栓并血流停搏,230例患者无血流停搏。与非心脏骤停组相比,心脏骤停组在90天功能独立性(34.78% vs. 37.83%;优势比[OR], 0.88[95%可信区间[CI], 0.6-1.28]; p = 0.50)、手术结束时eTICI 2c-3的发生率(77.39% vs. 78.26%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.61-1.48]; p = 0.83)或新部位栓塞(3.04% vs. 6.09%; OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.04-3.58]; p = 0.41)方面无显著差异。两组间的安全性结果无显著差异。结论:BGC暂时血流量停止对AIS-LVO取栓患者的功能独立性没有显著改善。该技术仍需进一步研究以证实其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balloon guide catheters for endovascular thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: Whether temporary blood flow arrest using balloon guide catheters (BGC) facilitates endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BGC utilization during thrombectomy for AIS-LVO.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 1 June 2025, for studies evaluating BGC in AIS-LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy. Eligibility screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2.

Results: Of 431 articles identified, two randomized trials involving 460 patients met the inclusion criteria, in which 230 patients received thrombectomy with blood flow arrest using BGC, and 230 patients without flow arrest. Compared with the nonflow arrest group, the flow arrest group showed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence (34.78% vs. 37.83%; odds ratio[OR], 0.88 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.28]; p = 0.50), rates of eTICI 2c-3 at the end of the procedure (77.39% vs. 78.26%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.61-1.48]; p = 0.83), or emboli to new territory (3.04% vs. 6.09%; OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.04-3.58]; p = 0.41). Safety outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: Temporary blood flow arrest with BGC did not significantly improve the functional independence in patients receiving thrombectomy for AIS-LVO. This technique remains a subject for future studies to confirm its efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信