{"title":"空间任务指令和全局激活趋势影响皮层到达网络的功能模块性。","authors":"L. Musa , A. Ghaderi , Y. Chen , J.D. Crawford","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Humans can be instructed to ignore visual cues or use them as landmarks for aiming movements (Musa et al. 2024), but it is not known how such allocentric cues interact with egocentric target codes and general planning activity to influence cortical network properties. To answer these questions, we applied graph theory analysis (GTA) to a previously described fMRI dataset (Chen et al. 2014). Participants were instructed to reach toward targets defined in egocentric or landmark-centered (allocentric) coordinates. During <em>Egocentric</em> pointing, cortical nodes clustered into four bilateral modules with correlated BOLD signals: a superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module, an inferior parietal / lateral frontal module, a superior temporal / inferior frontal module, and an inferior occipital-temporal / prefrontal module. The <em>Allocentric</em> task showed only three modules, in part because inferior occipital nodes were incorporated into the superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module. Both tasks engaged local (within module) and global (between module) cortical hubs, but the <em>Allocentric</em> task recruited additional hubs associated with allocentric visual codes and ego-allocentric integration. Removing reach-related activation trends reduced global synchrony and increased clustering, specifically diminishing dorsoventral coupling in the allocentric task. Cross-validated decoding and network parameter – reach error correlations confirmed that modularity was the best predictor of both task and specific behavioral measures. These results demonstrate that activation trends related to motor plans influence global network integration, whereas task instructions influence intermediate / local network properties, specifically the increased modular integration and hub recruitment observed in our <em>Allocentric</em> task.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 121460"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial task instructions and global activation trends influence functional modularity in the cortical reach network\",\"authors\":\"L. Musa , A. Ghaderi , Y. Chen , J.D. Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Humans can be instructed to ignore visual cues or use them as landmarks for aiming movements (Musa et al. 2024), but it is not known how such allocentric cues interact with egocentric target codes and general planning activity to influence cortical network properties. To answer these questions, we applied graph theory analysis (GTA) to a previously described fMRI dataset (Chen et al. 2014). Participants were instructed to reach toward targets defined in egocentric or landmark-centered (allocentric) coordinates. During <em>Egocentric</em> pointing, cortical nodes clustered into four bilateral modules with correlated BOLD signals: a superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module, an inferior parietal / lateral frontal module, a superior temporal / inferior frontal module, and an inferior occipital-temporal / prefrontal module. The <em>Allocentric</em> task showed only three modules, in part because inferior occipital nodes were incorporated into the superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module. Both tasks engaged local (within module) and global (between module) cortical hubs, but the <em>Allocentric</em> task recruited additional hubs associated with allocentric visual codes and ego-allocentric integration. Removing reach-related activation trends reduced global synchrony and increased clustering, specifically diminishing dorsoventral coupling in the allocentric task. Cross-validated decoding and network parameter – reach error correlations confirmed that modularity was the best predictor of both task and specific behavioral measures. These results demonstrate that activation trends related to motor plans influence global network integration, whereas task instructions influence intermediate / local network properties, specifically the increased modular integration and hub recruitment observed in our <em>Allocentric</em> task.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroImage\",\"volume\":\"320 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroImage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381192500463X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381192500463X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人类可以被指示忽略视觉线索或将其作为瞄准运动的标志(Musa et al. 2024),但尚不清楚这种非中心的线索如何与自我中心的目标代码和总体规划活动相互作用,从而影响皮层网络特性。为了回答这些问题,我们将图论分析(GTA)应用于先前描述的fMRI数据集(Chen et al. 2014)。参与者被指示朝着以自我为中心或以地标为中心(非中心)的坐标所定义的目标走去。在自我中心指向过程中,皮质节点聚集成四个具有相关BOLD信号的双侧模块:枕上-顶叶/躯体运动模块、顶叶下/侧额叶模块、颞上/下额叶模块和枕下-颞叶/前额叶模块。异心任务只显示了三个模块,部分原因是枕下淋巴结被并入枕上-顶叶/躯体运动模块。这两项任务都涉及局部(模块内)和全局(模块之间)皮质中枢,但异中心任务招募了与异中心视觉编码和自我-异中心整合相关的额外中枢。去除与到达相关的激活趋势减少了全局同步和增加的聚类,特别是减少了非中心任务中的背-腹侧耦合。交叉验证的解码和网络参数到达误差相关性证实,模块化是任务和特定行为测量的最佳预测指标。这些结果表明,与运动计划相关的激活趋势影响全局网络整合,而任务指令影响中间/局部网络特性,特别是在我们的非中心任务中观察到的模块化整合和枢纽招募的增加。
Spatial task instructions and global activation trends influence functional modularity in the cortical reach network
Humans can be instructed to ignore visual cues or use them as landmarks for aiming movements (Musa et al. 2024), but it is not known how such allocentric cues interact with egocentric target codes and general planning activity to influence cortical network properties. To answer these questions, we applied graph theory analysis (GTA) to a previously described fMRI dataset (Chen et al. 2014). Participants were instructed to reach toward targets defined in egocentric or landmark-centered (allocentric) coordinates. During Egocentric pointing, cortical nodes clustered into four bilateral modules with correlated BOLD signals: a superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module, an inferior parietal / lateral frontal module, a superior temporal / inferior frontal module, and an inferior occipital-temporal / prefrontal module. The Allocentric task showed only three modules, in part because inferior occipital nodes were incorporated into the superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module. Both tasks engaged local (within module) and global (between module) cortical hubs, but the Allocentric task recruited additional hubs associated with allocentric visual codes and ego-allocentric integration. Removing reach-related activation trends reduced global synchrony and increased clustering, specifically diminishing dorsoventral coupling in the allocentric task. Cross-validated decoding and network parameter – reach error correlations confirmed that modularity was the best predictor of both task and specific behavioral measures. These results demonstrate that activation trends related to motor plans influence global network integration, whereas task instructions influence intermediate / local network properties, specifically the increased modular integration and hub recruitment observed in our Allocentric task.
期刊介绍:
NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.