Eliane Porto Barboza, Caelab Caretta, Adrianna Eigo, Diogo Rodrigues
{"title":"磨牙症在种植体支持假体失败中的作用综述。","authors":"Eliane Porto Barboza, Caelab Caretta, Adrianna Eigo, Diogo Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.08.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Bruxism has been characterized by factors that include clenching or grinding leading to excessive and repeated forces on implant-supported prostheses, leading to multiple complications. Several systematic reviews have been published on this subject; however, umbrella reviews are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this umbrella review was to assess the methods and quality of systematic reviews examining the relationship between implant-supported prosthesis failure and bruxism.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An electronic search into PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted for articles published between January 1994 and April 2025. The reference lists were also searched. The eligibility criteria included systematic reviews that encompassed the relationship between bruxism and the failure of implant-supported prostheses. Quality analysis of the reviews was performed based on AMSTAR guidelines and the Glenny et al checklist. The review was registered in PROSPERO with the identification code CRD420251032758.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search resulted in 2395 articles, and 50 full-text articles remained for evaluation. Eight systematic reviews met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study, 5 of which included meta-analysis. The results revealed heterogeneity among the studies. Two systematic reviews exhibited perfect AMSTAR scores, whereas one systematic review showed a perfect Glenny et al score. The more recent systematic reviews revealed bruxism to be an important risk factor in the failure of implant-supported prostheses. Meta-analyses revealed a higher risk of failure in bruxers compared to non-bruxers. One systematic review reported an odds ratio of 4.68, indicating that failure was 4.68 times more likely in bruxers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bruxism plays an important role in the failure of implant-supported prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An umbrella review of the role of bruxism in the failure of implant-supported prostheses.\",\"authors\":\"Eliane Porto Barboza, Caelab Caretta, Adrianna Eigo, Diogo Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.08.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Bruxism has been characterized by factors that include clenching or grinding leading to excessive and repeated forces on implant-supported prostheses, leading to multiple complications. Several systematic reviews have been published on this subject; however, umbrella reviews are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this umbrella review was to assess the methods and quality of systematic reviews examining the relationship between implant-supported prosthesis failure and bruxism.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An electronic search into PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted for articles published between January 1994 and April 2025. The reference lists were also searched. The eligibility criteria included systematic reviews that encompassed the relationship between bruxism and the failure of implant-supported prostheses. Quality analysis of the reviews was performed based on AMSTAR guidelines and the Glenny et al checklist. The review was registered in PROSPERO with the identification code CRD420251032758.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search resulted in 2395 articles, and 50 full-text articles remained for evaluation. Eight systematic reviews met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study, 5 of which included meta-analysis. The results revealed heterogeneity among the studies. Two systematic reviews exhibited perfect AMSTAR scores, whereas one systematic review showed a perfect Glenny et al score. The more recent systematic reviews revealed bruxism to be an important risk factor in the failure of implant-supported prostheses. Meta-analyses revealed a higher risk of failure in bruxers compared to non-bruxers. One systematic review reported an odds ratio of 4.68, indicating that failure was 4.68 times more likely in bruxers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bruxism plays an important role in the failure of implant-supported prostheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.08.035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.08.035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
An umbrella review of the role of bruxism in the failure of implant-supported prostheses.
Statement of problem: Bruxism has been characterized by factors that include clenching or grinding leading to excessive and repeated forces on implant-supported prostheses, leading to multiple complications. Several systematic reviews have been published on this subject; however, umbrella reviews are lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this umbrella review was to assess the methods and quality of systematic reviews examining the relationship between implant-supported prosthesis failure and bruxism.
Material and methods: An electronic search into PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted for articles published between January 1994 and April 2025. The reference lists were also searched. The eligibility criteria included systematic reviews that encompassed the relationship between bruxism and the failure of implant-supported prostheses. Quality analysis of the reviews was performed based on AMSTAR guidelines and the Glenny et al checklist. The review was registered in PROSPERO with the identification code CRD420251032758.
Results: The initial search resulted in 2395 articles, and 50 full-text articles remained for evaluation. Eight systematic reviews met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study, 5 of which included meta-analysis. The results revealed heterogeneity among the studies. Two systematic reviews exhibited perfect AMSTAR scores, whereas one systematic review showed a perfect Glenny et al score. The more recent systematic reviews revealed bruxism to be an important risk factor in the failure of implant-supported prostheses. Meta-analyses revealed a higher risk of failure in bruxers compared to non-bruxers. One systematic review reported an odds ratio of 4.68, indicating that failure was 4.68 times more likely in bruxers.
Conclusions: Bruxism plays an important role in the failure of implant-supported prostheses.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
