益生元补充配方改善结肠直肠腺瘤患者肠道微生物群和肠道炎症微环境:一项双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sijia Meng, Chen Liu, Keming Zhang, Jiqiu Li, Dan Wang, Jing Zhao, Yu Wang, Meizhi Du, Chunyan Li, Yuan Wang, Wenli Lu, Yun Zhu
{"title":"益生元补充配方改善结肠直肠腺瘤患者肠道微生物群和肠道炎症微环境:一项双盲,安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Sijia Meng, Chen Liu, Keming Zhang, Jiqiu Li, Dan Wang, Jing Zhao, Yu Wang, Meizhi Du, Chunyan Li, Yuan Wang, Wenli Lu, Yun Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is preventable, and patients with colorectal adenomas are at high risk of colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a complex prebiotic formulation on the gut microbiota and inflammation levels in patients with colorectal adenoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial assigned patients with adenomatous polyps to either the prebiotic intervention group (N = 51) or the placebo control group (N = 49). Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and week 12; mixed-effects models were used to analyze the impact of the prebiotic on gut microbiota and inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed an increase in Bacteroidetes abundance over 12 wk, but the increase was smaller in the intervention group [β = -5.507; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.390, 0.375; P = 0.066]. Unidentified Ruminococcaceae increased in the intervention group (β = 2.072; 95% CI: -0.130, 4.274; P = 0.065), but declined in the control group. A significant increase in interleukin-10 concentrations was observed in the intervention group (β = 0.778; 95% CI: 0.132, 1.425; P = 0.019), in contrast to a downward trend in the control group. Notably, baseline tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations appeared to modify the intervention's microbial effects. Specifically, for each 1 pg/mL increase, the intervention was associated with increased Actinobacteria (β = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.100, 1.148; P-interaction <sub>=</sub> 0.020), Bifidobacteriaceae (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017), and Bifidobacterium (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017). However, these associations did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prebiotic intervention effectively increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, while simultaneously reducing inflammatory levels in individuals with colorectal adenoma. This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR2100046390.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prebiotic-Supplemented Formula Improves Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Inflammatory Microenvironment in Patients with Colorectal Adenoma: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sijia Meng, Chen Liu, Keming Zhang, Jiqiu Li, Dan Wang, Jing Zhao, Yu Wang, Meizhi Du, Chunyan Li, Yuan Wang, Wenli Lu, Yun Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is preventable, and patients with colorectal adenomas are at high risk of colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a complex prebiotic formulation on the gut microbiota and inflammation levels in patients with colorectal adenoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial assigned patients with adenomatous polyps to either the prebiotic intervention group (N = 51) or the placebo control group (N = 49). Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and week 12; mixed-effects models were used to analyze the impact of the prebiotic on gut microbiota and inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed an increase in Bacteroidetes abundance over 12 wk, but the increase was smaller in the intervention group [β = -5.507; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.390, 0.375; P = 0.066]. Unidentified Ruminococcaceae increased in the intervention group (β = 2.072; 95% CI: -0.130, 4.274; P = 0.065), but declined in the control group. A significant increase in interleukin-10 concentrations was observed in the intervention group (β = 0.778; 95% CI: 0.132, 1.425; P = 0.019), in contrast to a downward trend in the control group. Notably, baseline tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations appeared to modify the intervention's microbial effects. Specifically, for each 1 pg/mL increase, the intervention was associated with increased Actinobacteria (β = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.100, 1.148; P-interaction <sub>=</sub> 0.020), Bifidobacteriaceae (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017), and Bifidobacterium (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017). However, these associations did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prebiotic intervention effectively increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, while simultaneously reducing inflammatory levels in individuals with colorectal adenoma. This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR2100046390.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌是可以预防的,结直肠腺瘤患者是结直肠癌的高危人群。目的:本研究旨在评估复合益生元制剂对结直肠腺瘤患者肠道微生物群和炎症水平的影响。方法:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验将腺瘤性息肉患者分为益生元干预组(N=51)和安慰剂对照组(N=49)。在基线和第12周收集血液和粪便样本,使用混合效应模型分析益生元对肠道微生物群和炎症标志物的影响。结果:两组在12周内Bacteroidetes丰度均有所增加,但干预组的增幅较小(β = -5.507; 95% CI: -11.390 ~ 0.375; P = 0.066)。未识别的瘤胃球菌科在干预组呈上升趋势(β = 2.072; 95% CI: -0.130 ~ 4.274; P = 0.065),对照组呈下降趋势。干预组IL-10水平显著升高(β = 0.778; 95% CI: 0.132 ~ 1.425; P = 0.019),对照组IL-10水平呈下降趋势。值得注意的是,基线TNF-α水平似乎改变了干预的微生物效应。具体来说,每增加1 pg/mL,干预与放线菌(β = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.100至1.148;p相互作用= 0.020)、双歧杆菌科(β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114至1.103;p相互作用= 0.017)和双歧杆菌(β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114至1.103;p相互作用= 0.017)的增加有关。然而,在调整错误发现率后,这些关联在统计上并不显著。结论:益生元干预有效地增加了有益菌的丰度,同时降低了结直肠腺瘤患者的炎症水平。试验注册及伦理审批:本研究的试验注册号为ChiCTR2100046390。本研究经天津市南开医院伦理委员会批准(编号:No. 5)。NKYY_YXKT_IRB_2021_048_01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prebiotic-Supplemented Formula Improves Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Inflammatory Microenvironment in Patients with Colorectal Adenoma: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Background: Colorectal cancer is preventable, and patients with colorectal adenomas are at high risk of colorectal cancer.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a complex prebiotic formulation on the gut microbiota and inflammation levels in patients with colorectal adenoma.

Methods: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial assigned patients with adenomatous polyps to either the prebiotic intervention group (N = 51) or the placebo control group (N = 49). Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and week 12; mixed-effects models were used to analyze the impact of the prebiotic on gut microbiota and inflammatory markers.

Results: Both groups showed an increase in Bacteroidetes abundance over 12 wk, but the increase was smaller in the intervention group [β = -5.507; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.390, 0.375; P = 0.066]. Unidentified Ruminococcaceae increased in the intervention group (β = 2.072; 95% CI: -0.130, 4.274; P = 0.065), but declined in the control group. A significant increase in interleukin-10 concentrations was observed in the intervention group (β = 0.778; 95% CI: 0.132, 1.425; P = 0.019), in contrast to a downward trend in the control group. Notably, baseline tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations appeared to modify the intervention's microbial effects. Specifically, for each 1 pg/mL increase, the intervention was associated with increased Actinobacteria (β = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.100, 1.148; P-interaction = 0.020), Bifidobacteriaceae (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017), and Bifidobacterium (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017). However, these associations did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate adjustment.

Conclusions: The prebiotic intervention effectively increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, while simultaneously reducing inflammatory levels in individuals with colorectal adenoma. This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR2100046390.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信