单组分睡眠限制疗法对成人失眠的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jianing Wei, Fanjiayi Yang, Chenshuang Li, Xiaofang Dong, Yanjin Liu
{"title":"单组分睡眠限制疗法对成人失眠的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Jianing Wei, Fanjiayi Yang, Chenshuang Li, Xiaofang Dong, Yanjin Liu","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A meta-analysis was used to explore the effects of single-component sleep restriction therapy (SRT) on insomnia in adults. PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched until 31 July 2024. Literature quality evaluation was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. For variables with low heterogeneity, fixed-effect models were employed to pool effect sizes; otherwise, the random effect model was used. Nine studies with 1239 participants were included. At post-treatment, fixed-effects models revealed significant benefits of SRT versus control for insomnia severity (points), sleep onset latency (minutes) measured by sleep diary or actigraphy and sleep quality measured by sleep diary. Random-effects models revealed significant benefits of SRT versus control for sleep efficiency (percentage) measured by sleep diary and wake time after sleep onset (minutes) measured by sleep diary. Besides, fixed-effects models revealed that, compared to control, as an expected consequence of the treatment mechanism, SRT led to a significant reduction in total sleep time (minutes). Long-term follow-up data indicated sustained SRT effects on insomnia severity, sleep efficiency and wake time after sleep onset, but not on sleep onset latency. Our results confirm the effectiveness of SRT on insomnia in adults. However, the long-term effects of SRT are not consistent, and further studies are needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Single-Component Sleep Restriction Therapy for Insomnia in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jianing Wei, Fanjiayi Yang, Chenshuang Li, Xiaofang Dong, Yanjin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.70200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A meta-analysis was used to explore the effects of single-component sleep restriction therapy (SRT) on insomnia in adults. PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched until 31 July 2024. Literature quality evaluation was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. For variables with low heterogeneity, fixed-effect models were employed to pool effect sizes; otherwise, the random effect model was used. Nine studies with 1239 participants were included. At post-treatment, fixed-effects models revealed significant benefits of SRT versus control for insomnia severity (points), sleep onset latency (minutes) measured by sleep diary or actigraphy and sleep quality measured by sleep diary. Random-effects models revealed significant benefits of SRT versus control for sleep efficiency (percentage) measured by sleep diary and wake time after sleep onset (minutes) measured by sleep diary. Besides, fixed-effects models revealed that, compared to control, as an expected consequence of the treatment mechanism, SRT led to a significant reduction in total sleep time (minutes). Long-term follow-up data indicated sustained SRT effects on insomnia severity, sleep efficiency and wake time after sleep onset, but not on sleep onset latency. Our results confirm the effectiveness of SRT on insomnia in adults. However, the long-term effects of SRT are not consistent, and further studies are needed in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用荟萃分析探讨单组分睡眠限制疗法(SRT)对成人失眠的影响。PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Scopus, Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库被检索到2024年7月31日。采用Cochrane协作工具进行文献质量评价,采用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。对于异质性较低的变量,采用固定效应模型汇集效应大小;否则采用随机效应模型。9项研究共纳入1239名参与者。在治疗后,固定效应模型显示,在失眠严重程度(点数)、睡眠日记或活动记录仪测量的睡眠发作潜伏期(分钟)和睡眠日记测量的睡眠质量方面,SRT与对照组相比有显著的优势。随机效应模型显示,在睡眠日记测量的睡眠效率(百分比)和睡眠日记测量的睡眠开始后醒来时间(分钟)方面,SRT与对照组相比有显著的优势。此外,固定效应模型显示,与对照组相比,作为治疗机制的预期结果,SRT导致总睡眠时间(分钟)显著减少。长期随访数据显示,持续SRT对失眠严重程度、睡眠效率和睡眠开始后醒来时间有影响,但对睡眠开始潜伏期没有影响。我们的研究结果证实了SRT治疗成人失眠的有效性。然而,SRT的长期效果并不一致,未来需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Single-Component Sleep Restriction Therapy for Insomnia in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

A meta-analysis was used to explore the effects of single-component sleep restriction therapy (SRT) on insomnia in adults. PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched until 31 July 2024. Literature quality evaluation was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. For variables with low heterogeneity, fixed-effect models were employed to pool effect sizes; otherwise, the random effect model was used. Nine studies with 1239 participants were included. At post-treatment, fixed-effects models revealed significant benefits of SRT versus control for insomnia severity (points), sleep onset latency (minutes) measured by sleep diary or actigraphy and sleep quality measured by sleep diary. Random-effects models revealed significant benefits of SRT versus control for sleep efficiency (percentage) measured by sleep diary and wake time after sleep onset (minutes) measured by sleep diary. Besides, fixed-effects models revealed that, compared to control, as an expected consequence of the treatment mechanism, SRT led to a significant reduction in total sleep time (minutes). Long-term follow-up data indicated sustained SRT effects on insomnia severity, sleep efficiency and wake time after sleep onset, but not on sleep onset latency. Our results confirm the effectiveness of SRT on insomnia in adults. However, the long-term effects of SRT are not consistent, and further studies are needed in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信