在缺乏实验控制的情况下估计人类娱乐活动对野生动物的因果影响

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Robin Naidoo, Sumeet Gulati, James Vercammen, Cole Burton
{"title":"在缺乏实验控制的情况下估计人类娱乐活动对野生动物的因果影响","authors":"Robin Naidoo,&nbsp;Sumeet Gulati,&nbsp;James Vercammen,&nbsp;Cole Burton","doi":"10.1111/conl.13140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much recent research has focused on the impact of human recreation on wildlife, but relatively few studies have used causal inference approaches; doing so would strengthen recreation management and decision-making. Here, we use tools from the causal analysis literature and a multi-year observational dataset to assess how human road- and trail-use affects an apex predator, the grizzly bear (<i>Ursus arctos horribilis</i>). Our study leverages a natural experiment that reduced—via access restrictions and changes to tourism operator conditions—peak-season human recreation by ∼ 85% in 2023 compared to levels in 2018–2022.We used structural time series forecasting to quantify how weekly detection rates of grizzly bears changed in 2023 versus previous years, and “placebo tests” to strengthen causal inference and rule out competing hypotheses. We show that grizzly bear detections and temporal trends were 185% higher in late summer 2023 due to reduced human trail-use, providing robust evidence that human recreation can cause reduced wildlife activity in protected areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls\",\"authors\":\"Robin Naidoo,&nbsp;Sumeet Gulati,&nbsp;James Vercammen,&nbsp;Cole Burton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/conl.13140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Much recent research has focused on the impact of human recreation on wildlife, but relatively few studies have used causal inference approaches; doing so would strengthen recreation management and decision-making. Here, we use tools from the causal analysis literature and a multi-year observational dataset to assess how human road- and trail-use affects an apex predator, the grizzly bear (<i>Ursus arctos horribilis</i>). Our study leverages a natural experiment that reduced—via access restrictions and changes to tourism operator conditions—peak-season human recreation by ∼ 85% in 2023 compared to levels in 2018–2022.We used structural time series forecasting to quantify how weekly detection rates of grizzly bears changed in 2023 versus previous years, and “placebo tests” to strengthen causal inference and rule out competing hypotheses. We show that grizzly bear detections and temporal trends were 185% higher in late summer 2023 due to reduced human trail-use, providing robust evidence that human recreation can cause reduced wildlife activity in protected areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13140\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13140\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的许多研究都集中在人类娱乐对野生动物的影响上,但使用因果推理方法的研究相对较少;这样做将加强娱乐管理和决策。在这里,我们使用因果分析文献和多年观测数据集的工具来评估人类道路和小径的使用如何影响顶级捕食者灰熊(熊)。我们的研究利用了一项自然实验,通过访问限制和旅游运营商条件的变化,与2018-2022年的水平相比,2023年的旺季人类娱乐活动减少了约85%。我们使用结构时间序列预测来量化2023年灰熊的每周检测率与前几年的变化情况,并使用“安慰剂测试”来加强因果推理并排除相互竞争的假设。我们发现,由于人类小径使用的减少,2023年夏末灰熊的探测和时间趋势增加了185%,这为人类娱乐活动可能导致保护区野生动物活动减少提供了有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls

Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls

Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls

Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls

Estimating Causal Impacts of Human Recreation on Wildlife in the Absence of Experimental Controls

Much recent research has focused on the impact of human recreation on wildlife, but relatively few studies have used causal inference approaches; doing so would strengthen recreation management and decision-making. Here, we use tools from the causal analysis literature and a multi-year observational dataset to assess how human road- and trail-use affects an apex predator, the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis). Our study leverages a natural experiment that reduced—via access restrictions and changes to tourism operator conditions—peak-season human recreation by ∼ 85% in 2023 compared to levels in 2018–2022.We used structural time series forecasting to quantify how weekly detection rates of grizzly bears changed in 2023 versus previous years, and “placebo tests” to strengthen causal inference and rule out competing hypotheses. We show that grizzly bear detections and temporal trends were 185% higher in late summer 2023 due to reduced human trail-use, providing robust evidence that human recreation can cause reduced wildlife activity in protected areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信