看护会有影响吗?中国大流行期间的健康处罚和家庭照顾者

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Haijing Dai, Longxing Zhu, Niantao Jiang
{"title":"看护会有影响吗?中国大流行期间的健康处罚和家庭照顾者","authors":"Haijing Dai,&nbsp;Longxing Zhu,&nbsp;Niantao Jiang","doi":"10.1111/fare.13206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to examine the health penalty of primary family caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Family caregivers often experience social disadvantages and structural marginalization. In the growing literature on the multidimensional system of the family caregiver penalty, insufficient research efforts have been made to understand the health dimension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a national online survey with 2,819 Chinese citizens aged 18 years and older. They completed the questionnaire on their personal and family experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted logit models and generalized ordered logit models to discuss the health penalty of primary family caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that, compared with individuals who did not serve as primary family caregivers, primary family caregivers were more likely to become infected by the virus when China adopted the zero-COVID policy approach, suffered from more severe symptoms during infection when China lifted all the control measures, and took a longer period to recover. Primary family caregivers of different gender and different care duties experienced the health penalty in different patterns, and female primary family caregivers, those living with underage children, and those living with other adult family members were identified as the more disadvantaged groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study confirms the health penalty for primary family caregivers and social disparities during the pandemic in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The findings called for policy to address family and caregiver well-being in public health crises.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"1401-1423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does caregiving make a difference? Health penalty and family caregivers during the pandemic in China\",\"authors\":\"Haijing Dai,&nbsp;Longxing Zhu,&nbsp;Niantao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to examine the health penalty of primary family caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Family caregivers often experience social disadvantages and structural marginalization. In the growing literature on the multidimensional system of the family caregiver penalty, insufficient research efforts have been made to understand the health dimension.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a national online survey with 2,819 Chinese citizens aged 18 years and older. They completed the questionnaire on their personal and family experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted logit models and generalized ordered logit models to discuss the health penalty of primary family caregivers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that, compared with individuals who did not serve as primary family caregivers, primary family caregivers were more likely to become infected by the virus when China adopted the zero-COVID policy approach, suffered from more severe symptoms during infection when China lifted all the control measures, and took a longer period to recover. Primary family caregivers of different gender and different care duties experienced the health penalty in different patterns, and female primary family caregivers, those living with underage children, and those living with other adult family members were identified as the more disadvantaged groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study confirms the health penalty for primary family caregivers and social disparities during the pandemic in China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings called for policy to address family and caregiver well-being in public health crises.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"1401-1423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13206\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13206\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解2019冠状病毒病疫情期间中国主要家庭照顾者的健康惩罚情况。家庭照顾者经常经历社会劣势和结构性边缘化。在越来越多的关于家庭照顾者惩罚的多维系统的文献中,没有足够的研究努力来理解健康方面。方法对2819名年龄在18岁及以上的中国公民进行全国性在线调查。他们完成了关于2019冠状病毒病大流行的个人和家庭经历的调查问卷。采用logit模型和广义有序logit模型探讨初级家庭照顾者的健康惩罚。结果我们发现,与没有担任主要家庭照顾者的个体相比,中国采取零冠政策时主要家庭照顾者感染病毒的可能性更大,中国取消所有控制措施时感染期间症状更严重,康复时间更长。不同性别和不同照料职责的初级家庭照料者遭受健康惩罚的模式不同,女性初级家庭照料者、与未成年儿童一起生活的照料者和与其他成年家庭成员一起生活的照料者被认为是较为不利的群体。结论本研究证实了中国大流行期间初级家庭照顾者的健康惩罚和社会差异。研究结果呼吁制定政策,在公共卫生危机中解决家庭和照顾者的福祉问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does caregiving make a difference? Health penalty and family caregivers during the pandemic in China

Objective

This study aimed to examine the health penalty of primary family caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

Background

Family caregivers often experience social disadvantages and structural marginalization. In the growing literature on the multidimensional system of the family caregiver penalty, insufficient research efforts have been made to understand the health dimension.

Method

We conducted a national online survey with 2,819 Chinese citizens aged 18 years and older. They completed the questionnaire on their personal and family experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted logit models and generalized ordered logit models to discuss the health penalty of primary family caregivers.

Results

We found that, compared with individuals who did not serve as primary family caregivers, primary family caregivers were more likely to become infected by the virus when China adopted the zero-COVID policy approach, suffered from more severe symptoms during infection when China lifted all the control measures, and took a longer period to recover. Primary family caregivers of different gender and different care duties experienced the health penalty in different patterns, and female primary family caregivers, those living with underage children, and those living with other adult family members were identified as the more disadvantaged groups.

Conclusion

This study confirms the health penalty for primary family caregivers and social disparities during the pandemic in China.

Implications

The findings called for policy to address family and caregiver well-being in public health crises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信