伴侣紧张和支持与日常压力源的情感反应有关

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Dakota D. Witzel, Kelly D. Chandler, John G. Geldhof, Karen Hooker, Robert S. Stawski
{"title":"伴侣紧张和支持与日常压力源的情感反应有关","authors":"Dakota D. Witzel,&nbsp;Kelly D. Chandler,&nbsp;John G. Geldhof,&nbsp;Karen Hooker,&nbsp;Robert S. Stawski","doi":"10.1111/fare.13151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to understand how marital quality and gender influence affective responses to daily stressors (i.e., affective reactivity and residue).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Affective reactions are putative mechanisms through which daily stressors impact long-term health and well-being. Understanding which resilience or vulnerability factors (e.g., marital quality, gender) are associated with affective reactions is therefore crucial to promote healthy lives and aging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Data came from a subsample of married adults (<i>N</i> = 1,335) who participated in both the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study and the associated National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE). Participants rated their levels of strain and support with their partners in the MIDUS survey. As part of the NDSE, participants subsequently reported their affect and experience of daily stressors over 8 consecutive days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Partner strain significantly exacerbated associations between previous-day stressors and negative affect (i.e., affective residue), but not same-day stressor–affect associations (i.e., affective reactivity).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings from this study highlight the importance of marital quality for shaping daily stress and affective well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Cultivating couple relationship skills—including decreasing partner strain—in adulthood may provide a means to decrease affective reactions to daily stress and promote short- and long-term health and well-being.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"1424-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partner strain and support associations with affective reactions to daily stressors\",\"authors\":\"Dakota D. Witzel,&nbsp;Kelly D. Chandler,&nbsp;John G. Geldhof,&nbsp;Karen Hooker,&nbsp;Robert S. Stawski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to understand how marital quality and gender influence affective responses to daily stressors (i.e., affective reactivity and residue).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Affective reactions are putative mechanisms through which daily stressors impact long-term health and well-being. Understanding which resilience or vulnerability factors (e.g., marital quality, gender) are associated with affective reactions is therefore crucial to promote healthy lives and aging.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data came from a subsample of married adults (<i>N</i> = 1,335) who participated in both the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study and the associated National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE). Participants rated their levels of strain and support with their partners in the MIDUS survey. As part of the NDSE, participants subsequently reported their affect and experience of daily stressors over 8 consecutive days.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Partner strain significantly exacerbated associations between previous-day stressors and negative affect (i.e., affective residue), but not same-day stressor–affect associations (i.e., affective reactivity).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings from this study highlight the importance of marital quality for shaping daily stress and affective well-being.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cultivating couple relationship skills—including decreasing partner strain—in adulthood may provide a means to decrease affective reactions to daily stress and promote short- and long-term health and well-being.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"1424-1440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13151\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解婚姻质量和性别如何影响夫妻对日常压力源的情感反应(即情感反应性和剩余性)。情感反应是日常压力源影响长期健康和幸福的假定机制。因此,了解哪些复原力或脆弱性因素(例如,婚姻质量、性别)与情感反应有关,对于促进健康生活和老龄化至关重要。方法数据来自已婚成年人的子样本(N = 1335),他们参加了美国中年研究(MIDUS)和相关的国家日常经历研究(NSDE)。在MIDUS调查中,参与者评估了他们与伴侣的紧张程度和支持程度。作为NDSE的一部分,参与者随后报告了他们在连续8天内对日常压力源的影响和体验。结果伴侣紧张显著加剧了前一天应激源与负性情绪(即情感残留)之间的关联,但对当天应激源与负性情绪(即情感反应)之间的关联无显著影响。结论:本研究的结果强调了婚姻质量对塑造日常压力和情感幸福感的重要性。在成年期培养夫妻关系技巧——包括减少伴侣之间的紧张关系——可能提供一种方法,可以减少对日常压力的情感反应,促进短期和长期的健康和幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partner strain and support associations with affective reactions to daily stressors

Objective

We aimed to understand how marital quality and gender influence affective responses to daily stressors (i.e., affective reactivity and residue).

Background

Affective reactions are putative mechanisms through which daily stressors impact long-term health and well-being. Understanding which resilience or vulnerability factors (e.g., marital quality, gender) are associated with affective reactions is therefore crucial to promote healthy lives and aging.

Method

Data came from a subsample of married adults (N = 1,335) who participated in both the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study and the associated National Study of Daily Experiences (NSDE). Participants rated their levels of strain and support with their partners in the MIDUS survey. As part of the NDSE, participants subsequently reported their affect and experience of daily stressors over 8 consecutive days.

Results

Partner strain significantly exacerbated associations between previous-day stressors and negative affect (i.e., affective residue), but not same-day stressor–affect associations (i.e., affective reactivity).

Conclusion

Findings from this study highlight the importance of marital quality for shaping daily stress and affective well-being.

Implications

Cultivating couple relationship skills—including decreasing partner strain—in adulthood may provide a means to decrease affective reactions to daily stress and promote short- and long-term health and well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信