已发表的包括黑人/非裔美国夫妇在内的健康婚姻和关系教育功效研究的内容分析

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Elvis Gyan, Bradley van Eeden-Moorefield
{"title":"已发表的包括黑人/非裔美国夫妇在内的健康婚姻和关系教育功效研究的内容分析","authors":"Elvis Gyan,&nbsp;Bradley van Eeden-Moorefield","doi":"10.1111/fare.13178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This research emphasized the adverse contextual framing of Black/African American couples within a Eurocentric worldview.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Healthy Marriage Initiative was established to promote healthy marriage and relationship education (HMRE), primarily among low-income couples. Although Healthy Marriage Initiative efficacy studies incorporate Black/African American samples, the program's Eurocentric design exposes biases and assumptions about Black/African American couples, overlooking external determinants such as systemic racism not shared by Eurocentric couples. This issue leads to ambiguity regarding how Administration for Children and Families (ACF)-published efficacy studies, designed within a Eurocentric framework and including Black/African American samples, address these distinct determinants that detrimentally impact relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A content analysis of 39 ACF-funded HMRE efficacy studies that included Black/African American participants were coded for theoretical/conceptual foundations, Eurocentricity, class and structural barriers, and culturally relevant design measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicate that 89% of HMRE efficacy studies made no explicit mention of these barriers, 85% did not explicitly mention a theoretical or conceptual foundation, and 89% did not acknowledge Eurocentricity. Only 2.5% included a culturally relevant design measure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Recognizing the diversity of relationships and the unique nature of each couple's journey is crucial when providing or seeking information on marriage. Tailoring HMRE studies to individual cultural context may contribute to more effective and personalized support for couples.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"1561-1577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A content analysis of published healthy marriage and relationship education efficacy studies including Black/African American couples\",\"authors\":\"Elvis Gyan,&nbsp;Bradley van Eeden-Moorefield\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research emphasized the adverse contextual framing of Black/African American couples within a Eurocentric worldview.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Healthy Marriage Initiative was established to promote healthy marriage and relationship education (HMRE), primarily among low-income couples. Although Healthy Marriage Initiative efficacy studies incorporate Black/African American samples, the program's Eurocentric design exposes biases and assumptions about Black/African American couples, overlooking external determinants such as systemic racism not shared by Eurocentric couples. This issue leads to ambiguity regarding how Administration for Children and Families (ACF)-published efficacy studies, designed within a Eurocentric framework and including Black/African American samples, address these distinct determinants that detrimentally impact relationships.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A content analysis of 39 ACF-funded HMRE efficacy studies that included Black/African American participants were coded for theoretical/conceptual foundations, Eurocentricity, class and structural barriers, and culturally relevant design measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results indicate that 89% of HMRE efficacy studies made no explicit mention of these barriers, 85% did not explicitly mention a theoretical or conceptual foundation, and 89% did not acknowledge Eurocentricity. Only 2.5% included a culturally relevant design measure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recognizing the diversity of relationships and the unique nature of each couple's journey is crucial when providing or seeking information on marriage. Tailoring HMRE studies to individual cultural context may contribute to more effective and personalized support for couples.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"1561-1577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究强调在以欧洲为中心的世界观中,黑人/非裔美国人夫妇的不利语境框架。背景健康婚姻倡议旨在促进健康婚姻和关系教育(HMRE),主要是在低收入夫妇中。虽然健康婚姻倡议的有效性研究纳入了黑人/非裔美国人的样本,但该计划以欧洲为中心的设计暴露了对黑人/非裔美国人夫妇的偏见和假设,忽视了外部决定因素,如以欧洲为中心的夫妇没有共享的系统性种族主义。这个问题导致了关于儿童和家庭管理(ACF)发表的疗效研究的模糊性,这些研究是在以欧洲为中心的框架内设计的,包括黑人/非裔美国人样本,解决这些对关系产生不利影响的不同决定因素。方法对39项acf资助的包括黑人/非裔美国人参与者的HMRE疗效研究进行内容分析,对理论/概念基础、欧洲中心性、阶级和结构障碍以及文化相关的设计措施进行编码。结果表明,89%的HMRE疗效研究没有明确提及这些障碍,85%没有明确提及理论或概念基础,89%没有承认欧洲中心性。只有2.5%包含了与文化相关的设计测量。在提供或寻求有关婚姻的信息时,认识到关系的多样性和每对夫妇旅程的独特性是至关重要的。根据个人的文化背景来定制HMRE研究可能有助于为夫妇提供更有效和个性化的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A content analysis of published healthy marriage and relationship education efficacy studies including Black/African American couples

Objective

This research emphasized the adverse contextual framing of Black/African American couples within a Eurocentric worldview.

Background

The Healthy Marriage Initiative was established to promote healthy marriage and relationship education (HMRE), primarily among low-income couples. Although Healthy Marriage Initiative efficacy studies incorporate Black/African American samples, the program's Eurocentric design exposes biases and assumptions about Black/African American couples, overlooking external determinants such as systemic racism not shared by Eurocentric couples. This issue leads to ambiguity regarding how Administration for Children and Families (ACF)-published efficacy studies, designed within a Eurocentric framework and including Black/African American samples, address these distinct determinants that detrimentally impact relationships.

Method

A content analysis of 39 ACF-funded HMRE efficacy studies that included Black/African American participants were coded for theoretical/conceptual foundations, Eurocentricity, class and structural barriers, and culturally relevant design measures.

Results

Results indicate that 89% of HMRE efficacy studies made no explicit mention of these barriers, 85% did not explicitly mention a theoretical or conceptual foundation, and 89% did not acknowledge Eurocentricity. Only 2.5% included a culturally relevant design measure.

Implications

Recognizing the diversity of relationships and the unique nature of each couple's journey is crucial when providing or seeking information on marriage. Tailoring HMRE studies to individual cultural context may contribute to more effective and personalized support for couples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信