Corey T. Callaghan, Ruben Venegas-Li, Brittany M. Mason, Richard A. Fuller, Rebecca Spake, James E. M. Watson
{"title":"高度完整的森林对森林专业鸟类至关重要","authors":"Corey T. Callaghan, Ruben Venegas-Li, Brittany M. Mason, Richard A. Fuller, Rebecca Spake, James E. M. Watson","doi":"10.1111/geb.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Efforts to retain and restore forest integrity—the degree to which a forest's structure and function are not modified by humans—are increasingly underpinning global biodiversity conservation efforts. However, there is still much uncertainty around how species respond to changes in forest integrity. Geographically variable responses would have consequences for conservation planning assessments and targeted conservation action. Our goal was to quantify the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global; 98 bioregions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>2017–2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Birds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>By integrating global-scale spatially explicit forest landscape integrity data with a citizen science bird dataset, we provide the first empirical assessment of the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that both species richness and abundance of forest specialists had a positive association with integrity. However, the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity varied across bioregions, with bioregions at low latitudes tending to have more positive relationships between forest integrity and species richness. Of the 74 bioregions assessed, 64% had more than half of their species favouring high integrity forests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results support calls for the targeted protection of the world's remaining high-integrity forests but also showcase that consideration must be given to restoring forest integrity where possible.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Integrity Forests Are Critical for Forest Specialist Birds\",\"authors\":\"Corey T. Callaghan, Ruben Venegas-Li, Brittany M. Mason, Richard A. Fuller, Rebecca Spake, James E. M. Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Efforts to retain and restore forest integrity—the degree to which a forest's structure and function are not modified by humans—are increasingly underpinning global biodiversity conservation efforts. However, there is still much uncertainty around how species respond to changes in forest integrity. Geographically variable responses would have consequences for conservation planning assessments and targeted conservation action. Our goal was to quantify the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global; 98 bioregions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>2017–2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Birds.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>By integrating global-scale spatially explicit forest landscape integrity data with a citizen science bird dataset, we provide the first empirical assessment of the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that both species richness and abundance of forest specialists had a positive association with integrity. However, the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity varied across bioregions, with bioregions at low latitudes tending to have more positive relationships between forest integrity and species richness. Of the 74 bioregions assessed, 64% had more than half of their species favouring high integrity forests.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results support calls for the targeted protection of the world's remaining high-integrity forests but also showcase that consideration must be given to restoring forest integrity where possible.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70118\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70118\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-Integrity Forests Are Critical for Forest Specialist Birds
Aim
Efforts to retain and restore forest integrity—the degree to which a forest's structure and function are not modified by humans—are increasingly underpinning global biodiversity conservation efforts. However, there is still much uncertainty around how species respond to changes in forest integrity. Geographically variable responses would have consequences for conservation planning assessments and targeted conservation action. Our goal was to quantify the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity.
Location
Global; 98 bioregions.
Time Period
2017–2020.
Major Taxa Studied
Birds.
Methods
By integrating global-scale spatially explicit forest landscape integrity data with a citizen science bird dataset, we provide the first empirical assessment of the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity.
Results
We found that both species richness and abundance of forest specialists had a positive association with integrity. However, the relationship between forest integrity and bird diversity varied across bioregions, with bioregions at low latitudes tending to have more positive relationships between forest integrity and species richness. Of the 74 bioregions assessed, 64% had more than half of their species favouring high integrity forests.
Main Conclusions
These results support calls for the targeted protection of the world's remaining high-integrity forests but also showcase that consideration must be given to restoring forest integrity where possible.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.