Cinda Clark, Kallen Shaw, Patricia Snyder, Maureen Conroy, Helena Mawdsley
{"title":"家庭支持作为早期儿童家访模式组成部分的综合回顾","authors":"Cinda Clark, Kallen Shaw, Patricia Snyder, Maureen Conroy, Helena Mawdsley","doi":"10.1111/fare.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted an integrative review to identify family support categories that have been described as components of early childhood home visiting models in empirical research and to distinguish whether supports were formal or informal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Key components of most early childhood home visiting models include family supports intended to promote child and family outcomes. Categories of family support have been described in other extant literature: (a) material, (b) informational, (c) social–emotional, and (d) organizational. Family support has been further categorized as formal or informal. In this literature, informal supports have been characterized as more enduring and meaningful than formal ones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted. A total of 244 studies representing 127 early childhood home visiting models were located and coded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Formal informational supports were the most frequently reported family support category. Informal supports were reported much less frequently than formal supports.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Given the enduring impacts of informal family supports, home visiting models should include both informal and formal supports. Empirical studies should include descriptions of the types of family supports in home visiting models and more explicitly hypothesize linkages to intended outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Future work should include refining the definitions of support categories, distinguishing informal and formal supports, exploring interactions among supports, and understanding the functions of supports from the perspectives of families and home visitors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"1961-1978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative review of family supports as components of early childhood home visiting models\",\"authors\":\"Cinda Clark, Kallen Shaw, Patricia Snyder, Maureen Conroy, Helena Mawdsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted an integrative review to identify family support categories that have been described as components of early childhood home visiting models in empirical research and to distinguish whether supports were formal or informal.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Key components of most early childhood home visiting models include family supports intended to promote child and family outcomes. Categories of family support have been described in other extant literature: (a) material, (b) informational, (c) social–emotional, and (d) organizational. Family support has been further categorized as formal or informal. In this literature, informal supports have been characterized as more enduring and meaningful than formal ones.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted. A total of 244 studies representing 127 early childhood home visiting models were located and coded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Formal informational supports were the most frequently reported family support category. Informal supports were reported much less frequently than formal supports.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Given the enduring impacts of informal family supports, home visiting models should include both informal and formal supports. Empirical studies should include descriptions of the types of family supports in home visiting models and more explicitly hypothesize linkages to intended outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Future work should include refining the definitions of support categories, distinguishing informal and formal supports, exploring interactions among supports, and understanding the functions of supports from the perspectives of families and home visitors.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"1961-1978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.70001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrative review of family supports as components of early childhood home visiting models
Objective
We conducted an integrative review to identify family support categories that have been described as components of early childhood home visiting models in empirical research and to distinguish whether supports were formal or informal.
Background
Key components of most early childhood home visiting models include family supports intended to promote child and family outcomes. Categories of family support have been described in other extant literature: (a) material, (b) informational, (c) social–emotional, and (d) organizational. Family support has been further categorized as formal or informal. In this literature, informal supports have been characterized as more enduring and meaningful than formal ones.
Method
A systematic literature search was conducted. A total of 244 studies representing 127 early childhood home visiting models were located and coded.
Results
Formal informational supports were the most frequently reported family support category. Informal supports were reported much less frequently than formal supports.
Conclusion
Given the enduring impacts of informal family supports, home visiting models should include both informal and formal supports. Empirical studies should include descriptions of the types of family supports in home visiting models and more explicitly hypothesize linkages to intended outcomes.
Implications
Future work should include refining the definitions of support categories, distinguishing informal and formal supports, exploring interactions among supports, and understanding the functions of supports from the perspectives of families and home visitors.
期刊介绍:
A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.