地球磁层电场的测试场线制图

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Yusuke Ebihara, Masafumi Hirahara, Takashi Tanaka
{"title":"地球磁层电场的测试场线制图","authors":"Yusuke Ebihara,&nbsp;Masafumi Hirahara,&nbsp;Takashi Tanaka","doi":"10.1029/2025JA034108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The convection electric field plays a fundamental role in transporting plasma within the magnetosphere. A widely accepted assumption in both observational and modeling studies is that the electric fields can be instantaneously mapped along magnetic field lines. To evaluate the validity of this assumption, we conducted a global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation under a southward interplanetary magnetic field, focusing on the electric fields at midnight. Major findings are as follows: (a) The mapping between magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields is generally imperfect, even when propagation and travel time of Alfvén waves are considered. (b) During the substorm growth phase, ionospheric electric fields are ∼1.5 times larger than those in the magnetosphere. Induction electric fields significantly reduce magnetospheric electric fields. (c) In the substorm expansion phase, the electric fields are highly variable, and the ionospheric electric fields are typically smaller than the magnetospheric electric fields by a factor of ∼6–8. (d) At low <i>L</i>-shells (<i>L</i> = 4–5), magnetic footprints are close to Alfvénic footprints. (e) At high <i>L</i>-shells (<i>L</i> = 6–10), a substantial mismatch exists between magnetic and Alfvénic footprints. The discrepancies between magnetospheric and electric fields are attributed to induction electric fields, external forces acting on plasma, and the insufficient number of interactions between the magnetosphere and the ionosphere. We conclude that field-line mapping of electric fields is marginally valid at low <i>L</i>-shells (<i>L</i> &lt; 5) and under quasi-steady conditions, despite some differences in magnitude. Future studies incorporating dispersive and kinetic Alfvén waves are needed to obtain definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JA034108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Field-Line Mapping of Electric Fields in Earth's Magnetosphere\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Ebihara,&nbsp;Masafumi Hirahara,&nbsp;Takashi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JA034108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The convection electric field plays a fundamental role in transporting plasma within the magnetosphere. A widely accepted assumption in both observational and modeling studies is that the electric fields can be instantaneously mapped along magnetic field lines. To evaluate the validity of this assumption, we conducted a global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation under a southward interplanetary magnetic field, focusing on the electric fields at midnight. Major findings are as follows: (a) The mapping between magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields is generally imperfect, even when propagation and travel time of Alfvén waves are considered. (b) During the substorm growth phase, ionospheric electric fields are ∼1.5 times larger than those in the magnetosphere. Induction electric fields significantly reduce magnetospheric electric fields. (c) In the substorm expansion phase, the electric fields are highly variable, and the ionospheric electric fields are typically smaller than the magnetospheric electric fields by a factor of ∼6–8. (d) At low <i>L</i>-shells (<i>L</i> = 4–5), magnetic footprints are close to Alfvénic footprints. (e) At high <i>L</i>-shells (<i>L</i> = 6–10), a substantial mismatch exists between magnetic and Alfvénic footprints. The discrepancies between magnetospheric and electric fields are attributed to induction electric fields, external forces acting on plasma, and the insufficient number of interactions between the magnetosphere and the ionosphere. We conclude that field-line mapping of electric fields is marginally valid at low <i>L</i>-shells (<i>L</i> &lt; 5) and under quasi-steady conditions, despite some differences in magnitude. Future studies incorporating dispersive and kinetic Alfvén waves are needed to obtain definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"130 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JA034108\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JA034108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JA034108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对流电场对等离子体在磁层内的传输起着重要的作用。在观测和模拟研究中,一个被广泛接受的假设是电场可以沿着磁力线瞬间绘制。为了评估这一假设的有效性,我们在向南的行星际磁场下进行了全球磁流体动力学(MHD)模拟,重点研究了午夜的电场。主要发现如下:(a)磁层和电离层电场之间的作图通常是不完善的,即使考虑到阿尔夫萨芬波的传播和传播时间也是如此。(b)在亚暴生长阶段,电离层电场比磁层电场大约1.5倍。感应电场显著减小磁层电场。(c)在亚暴膨胀阶段,电场变化很大,电离层电场通常比磁层电场小约6-8倍。(d)在低L壳层(L = 4-5),磁足迹接近于alfvvac足迹。(e)在高L-壳层(L = 6-10),磁足迹和阿尔夫卡萨奇足迹之间存在很大的不匹配。磁层和电场之间的差异归因于感应电场、作用在等离子体上的外力以及磁层和电离层之间相互作用的数量不足。我们得出结论,电场的场线映射在低L壳层(L < 5)和准稳定条件下是边际有效的,尽管在量级上存在一些差异。为了得到明确的结论,需要进一步的研究,包括色散和动力学的alfvsamn波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Testing Field-Line Mapping of Electric Fields in Earth's Magnetosphere

Testing Field-Line Mapping of Electric Fields in Earth's Magnetosphere

Testing Field-Line Mapping of Electric Fields in Earth's Magnetosphere

Testing Field-Line Mapping of Electric Fields in Earth's Magnetosphere

Testing Field-Line Mapping of Electric Fields in Earth's Magnetosphere

The convection electric field plays a fundamental role in transporting plasma within the magnetosphere. A widely accepted assumption in both observational and modeling studies is that the electric fields can be instantaneously mapped along magnetic field lines. To evaluate the validity of this assumption, we conducted a global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation under a southward interplanetary magnetic field, focusing on the electric fields at midnight. Major findings are as follows: (a) The mapping between magnetospheric and ionospheric electric fields is generally imperfect, even when propagation and travel time of Alfvén waves are considered. (b) During the substorm growth phase, ionospheric electric fields are ∼1.5 times larger than those in the magnetosphere. Induction electric fields significantly reduce magnetospheric electric fields. (c) In the substorm expansion phase, the electric fields are highly variable, and the ionospheric electric fields are typically smaller than the magnetospheric electric fields by a factor of ∼6–8. (d) At low L-shells (L = 4–5), magnetic footprints are close to Alfvénic footprints. (e) At high L-shells (L = 6–10), a substantial mismatch exists between magnetic and Alfvénic footprints. The discrepancies between magnetospheric and electric fields are attributed to induction electric fields, external forces acting on plasma, and the insufficient number of interactions between the magnetosphere and the ionosphere. We conclude that field-line mapping of electric fields is marginally valid at low L-shells (L < 5) and under quasi-steady conditions, despite some differences in magnitude. Future studies incorporating dispersive and kinetic Alfvén waves are needed to obtain definitive conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信