{"title":"从低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)到脂蛋白(a)——那些不从历史中吸取教训的人注定要重蹈覆辙","authors":"Ashish Sarraju , Steve E Nissen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a critical component of managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. However, LDL-C goal attainment and the use of LDL-C lowering therapies, which include cost-effective statins and multiple non-statin therapies, have remained suboptimal. In this setting, ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US and globally. Due to persistent ASCVD risk despite LDL-C lowering, there has been strong interest in approaches to identify factors contributing to residual ASCVD risk beyond LDL-C levels. In particular, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] has emerged as a leading target for multiple ongoing development programs of novel, potent pharmacologic agents that decrease Lp (a) levels, with ongoing clinical trials evaluating their effects on ASCVD events. This review outlines key lessons learned from the suboptimal implementation of LDL-C therapies that may be relevant to better implementation of future residual ASCVD risk reduction strategies, particularly for Lp (a) therapies that may be proven in clinical trials and approved by regulatory authorities in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101280"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From LDL-C to lipoprotein(a) - those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it\",\"authors\":\"Ashish Sarraju , Steve E Nissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a critical component of managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. However, LDL-C goal attainment and the use of LDL-C lowering therapies, which include cost-effective statins and multiple non-statin therapies, have remained suboptimal. In this setting, ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US and globally. Due to persistent ASCVD risk despite LDL-C lowering, there has been strong interest in approaches to identify factors contributing to residual ASCVD risk beyond LDL-C levels. In particular, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] has emerged as a leading target for multiple ongoing development programs of novel, potent pharmacologic agents that decrease Lp (a) levels, with ongoing clinical trials evaluating their effects on ASCVD events. This review outlines key lessons learned from the suboptimal implementation of LDL-C therapies that may be relevant to better implementation of future residual ASCVD risk reduction strategies, particularly for Lp (a) therapies that may be proven in clinical trials and approved by regulatory authorities in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725003551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725003551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From LDL-C to lipoprotein(a) - those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it
Reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a critical component of managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. However, LDL-C goal attainment and the use of LDL-C lowering therapies, which include cost-effective statins and multiple non-statin therapies, have remained suboptimal. In this setting, ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US and globally. Due to persistent ASCVD risk despite LDL-C lowering, there has been strong interest in approaches to identify factors contributing to residual ASCVD risk beyond LDL-C levels. In particular, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] has emerged as a leading target for multiple ongoing development programs of novel, potent pharmacologic agents that decrease Lp (a) levels, with ongoing clinical trials evaluating their effects on ASCVD events. This review outlines key lessons learned from the suboptimal implementation of LDL-C therapies that may be relevant to better implementation of future residual ASCVD risk reduction strategies, particularly for Lp (a) therapies that may be proven in clinical trials and approved by regulatory authorities in the future.