用于评估高温下钢筋混凝土粘结强度的数据驱动和可解释的人工智能模型

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Rwayda Kh.S. Al-Hamd , Asad S. Albostami , Holly Warren
{"title":"用于评估高温下钢筋混凝土粘结强度的数据驱动和可解释的人工智能模型","authors":"Rwayda Kh.S. Al-Hamd ,&nbsp;Asad S. Albostami ,&nbsp;Holly Warren","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bond between steel and concrete in reinforced concrete (RC) and fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC) structures is a multifaceted and intricate phenomenon. It refers to the adhesion and mechanical interlock between the steel reinforcement bars and the surrounding concrete matrix. The bond becomes more complex at elevated temperatures; however, having an accurate estimate is a crucial factor in design. Therefore, this paper employs advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to predict bond strength (<em>T<sub>b</sub></em>) at both ambient and elevated temperatures from a 394-point experimental database, which includes additional variables such as fibre content, geometric ratios, and thermal parameter conditions. Seven models were built and assessed, including Linear Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), <em>k</em>-nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Deep Learning (DLearning) Regressors. The GB, XGBoost, and DT models offered the best prediction results with R² above 0.95 for the testing datasets, lowest error metrics (mean absolute error (MAE) between 0.8 and 1.1 MPa), and highest reliability (a30%-index ≥ 90%), all outperforming those reported in earlier literature. According to SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, the length-to-diameter ratio (<span><math><mrow><mfrac><mi>l</mi><mi>d</mi></mfrac></mrow></math></span>) and failure surface temperature (<span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow></math></span>) dominated as the predictors, followed by concrete compressive strength (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), and cover-to-diameter ratio (<span><math><mrow><mfrac><mi>c</mi><mi>d</mi></mfrac></mrow></math></span>), which is according to the existing mechanics of bond and thermal degradation. This study presents resolutions regarding the promise of data-driven models to accurately, reliably, and interpretably predict bond strength in post-fire conditions, which is of great merit in terms of resilient design practice. Future work may investigate hybrid ML–mechanistic frameworks and the integration of full-scale fire testing to further enhance engineering applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104514"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven and explainable AI models for evaluating bond strength in reinforced concrete at elevated temperatures\",\"authors\":\"Rwayda Kh.S. Al-Hamd ,&nbsp;Asad S. Albostami ,&nbsp;Holly Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The bond between steel and concrete in reinforced concrete (RC) and fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC) structures is a multifaceted and intricate phenomenon. It refers to the adhesion and mechanical interlock between the steel reinforcement bars and the surrounding concrete matrix. The bond becomes more complex at elevated temperatures; however, having an accurate estimate is a crucial factor in design. Therefore, this paper employs advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to predict bond strength (<em>T<sub>b</sub></em>) at both ambient and elevated temperatures from a 394-point experimental database, which includes additional variables such as fibre content, geometric ratios, and thermal parameter conditions. Seven models were built and assessed, including Linear Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), <em>k</em>-nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Deep Learning (DLearning) Regressors. The GB, XGBoost, and DT models offered the best prediction results with R² above 0.95 for the testing datasets, lowest error metrics (mean absolute error (MAE) between 0.8 and 1.1 MPa), and highest reliability (a30%-index ≥ 90%), all outperforming those reported in earlier literature. According to SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, the length-to-diameter ratio (<span><math><mrow><mfrac><mi>l</mi><mi>d</mi></mfrac></mrow></math></span>) and failure surface temperature (<span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow></math></span>) dominated as the predictors, followed by concrete compressive strength (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), and cover-to-diameter ratio (<span><math><mrow><mfrac><mi>c</mi><mi>d</mi></mfrac></mrow></math></span>), which is according to the existing mechanics of bond and thermal degradation. This study presents resolutions regarding the promise of data-driven models to accurately, reliably, and interpretably predict bond strength in post-fire conditions, which is of great merit in terms of resilient design practice. Future work may investigate hybrid ML–mechanistic frameworks and the integration of full-scale fire testing to further enhance engineering applicability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037971122500178X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037971122500178X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在钢筋混凝土(RC)和纤维增强混凝土(FRC)结构中,钢与混凝土之间的结合是一个多方面和复杂的现象。它是指钢筋与周围混凝土基体之间的附着力和机械联锁。在高温下,化学键变得更加复杂;然而,在设计中有一个准确的估计是一个关键因素。因此,本文采用先进的机器学习(ML)技术,从394点实验数据库中预测环境温度和高温下的粘结强度(Tb),其中包括纤维含量、几何比和热参数条件等附加变量。建立并评估了七个模型,包括线性回归(LR)、梯度增强(GB)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、人工神经网络(ANN)、k近邻(KNN)、决策树(DT)和深度学习(DLearning)回归。GB、XGBoost和DT模型的预测结果最好,R²> 0.95,误差指标最低(平均绝对误差(MAE)在0.8 ~ 1.1 MPa之间),可靠性最高(a30%-index≥90%),均优于先前文献的预测结果。根据SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析,长径比(ld)和破坏表面温度(T)作为预测因子占主导地位,其次是混凝土抗压强度(fc)和覆盖直径比(cd),这符合现有的粘结和热降解机制。本研究提出了有关数据驱动模型的解决方案,以准确、可靠和可解释地预测火灾后条件下的粘结强度,这在弹性设计实践方面具有很大的优点。未来的工作可能会研究混合机器学习-机械框架和全尺寸火灾测试的集成,以进一步提高工程适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data-driven and explainable AI models for evaluating bond strength in reinforced concrete at elevated temperatures
The bond between steel and concrete in reinforced concrete (RC) and fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC) structures is a multifaceted and intricate phenomenon. It refers to the adhesion and mechanical interlock between the steel reinforcement bars and the surrounding concrete matrix. The bond becomes more complex at elevated temperatures; however, having an accurate estimate is a crucial factor in design. Therefore, this paper employs advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to predict bond strength (Tb) at both ambient and elevated temperatures from a 394-point experimental database, which includes additional variables such as fibre content, geometric ratios, and thermal parameter conditions. Seven models were built and assessed, including Linear Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), k-nearest Neighbours (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Deep Learning (DLearning) Regressors. The GB, XGBoost, and DT models offered the best prediction results with R² above 0.95 for the testing datasets, lowest error metrics (mean absolute error (MAE) between 0.8 and 1.1 MPa), and highest reliability (a30%-index ≥ 90%), all outperforming those reported in earlier literature. According to SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, the length-to-diameter ratio (ld) and failure surface temperature (T) dominated as the predictors, followed by concrete compressive strength (fc), and cover-to-diameter ratio (cd), which is according to the existing mechanics of bond and thermal degradation. This study presents resolutions regarding the promise of data-driven models to accurately, reliably, and interpretably predict bond strength in post-fire conditions, which is of great merit in terms of resilient design practice. Future work may investigate hybrid ML–mechanistic frameworks and the integration of full-scale fire testing to further enhance engineering applicability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信