胃肠大出血的处理

Madhavi UV Natarajan, James W O'Brien, Matthew Rogers, Michelle Gallagher, Timothy Rockall
{"title":"胃肠大出血的处理","authors":"Madhavi UV Natarajan,&nbsp;James W O'Brien,&nbsp;Matthew Rogers,&nbsp;Michelle Gallagher,&nbsp;Timothy Rockall","doi":"10.1016/j.mpsur.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage is a common medical emergency, with one patient presenting every 6 minutes in the UK (70–90,000 cases per year). It is associated with a significant mortality rate that has remained relatively static at 10% for more than two decades. Haemorrhage is commonly categorized as bleeding of upper or lower GI origin, but for organization of care, both groups should be regarded as one clinical entity. Rapid assessment, resuscitation and correction of coagulopathy should be undertaken, following local major haemorrhage protocols, with investigation urgently arranged. For upper GI haemorrhage, endoscopy remains the gold standard for simultaneous investigation and treatment. For lower GI haemorrhage, a more nuanced algorithm is available, including CT angiography for actively bleeding or unstable patients, and endoscopic evaluation in select cases. Clinicians may utilize a range of endoscopic and radiological techniques to diagnose and control the source of haemorrhage, which should be tailored to the site of bleeding and pathology. When haemostasis is not achieved, either repeat intervention or a different modality should be selected. Surgery is now infrequently used as a treatment for GI haemorrhage and should be contemplated only once endoscopic and radiological treatments have failed, following discussion between senior clinicians. Postoperative GI bleeding may still be best served with return to theatre, but interventional radiology should also be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74889,"journal":{"name":"Surgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire)","volume":"43 9","pages":"Pages 580-592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Madhavi UV Natarajan,&nbsp;James W O'Brien,&nbsp;Matthew Rogers,&nbsp;Michelle Gallagher,&nbsp;Timothy Rockall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpsur.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage is a common medical emergency, with one patient presenting every 6 minutes in the UK (70–90,000 cases per year). It is associated with a significant mortality rate that has remained relatively static at 10% for more than two decades. Haemorrhage is commonly categorized as bleeding of upper or lower GI origin, but for organization of care, both groups should be regarded as one clinical entity. Rapid assessment, resuscitation and correction of coagulopathy should be undertaken, following local major haemorrhage protocols, with investigation urgently arranged. For upper GI haemorrhage, endoscopy remains the gold standard for simultaneous investigation and treatment. For lower GI haemorrhage, a more nuanced algorithm is available, including CT angiography for actively bleeding or unstable patients, and endoscopic evaluation in select cases. Clinicians may utilize a range of endoscopic and radiological techniques to diagnose and control the source of haemorrhage, which should be tailored to the site of bleeding and pathology. When haemostasis is not achieved, either repeat intervention or a different modality should be selected. Surgery is now infrequently used as a treatment for GI haemorrhage and should be contemplated only once endoscopic and radiological treatments have failed, following discussion between senior clinicians. Postoperative GI bleeding may still be best served with return to theatre, but interventional radiology should also be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire)\",\"volume\":\"43 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 580-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263931925001152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263931925001152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃肠道出血是一种常见的医疗紧急情况,在英国每6分钟就有一名患者出现(每年70-90,000例)。它与死亡率显著相关,20多年来,死亡率一直相对稳定在10%。出血通常分为上消化道出血或下消化道出血,但在护理组织方面,这两组应被视为一个临床实体。应根据当地大出血方案,对凝血功能障碍进行快速评估、复苏和纠正,并紧急安排调查。对于上消化道出血,内窥镜检查仍然是同时检查和治疗的金标准。对于下消化道出血,一种更细致的算法是可用的,包括对活动性出血或不稳定患者的CT血管造影,以及对特定病例的内镜评估。临床医生可以利用一系列内窥镜和放射学技术来诊断和控制出血的来源,这应该根据出血的部位和病理进行调整。当止血不能达到时,应选择重复干预或不同的方式。手术现在很少用于胃肠道出血的治疗,只有在内窥镜和放射治疗失败后,经过高级临床医生的讨论,才应该考虑手术。术后消化道出血可能仍然是最好的治疗方案,但也应考虑介入放射学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage is a common medical emergency, with one patient presenting every 6 minutes in the UK (70–90,000 cases per year). It is associated with a significant mortality rate that has remained relatively static at 10% for more than two decades. Haemorrhage is commonly categorized as bleeding of upper or lower GI origin, but for organization of care, both groups should be regarded as one clinical entity. Rapid assessment, resuscitation and correction of coagulopathy should be undertaken, following local major haemorrhage protocols, with investigation urgently arranged. For upper GI haemorrhage, endoscopy remains the gold standard for simultaneous investigation and treatment. For lower GI haemorrhage, a more nuanced algorithm is available, including CT angiography for actively bleeding or unstable patients, and endoscopic evaluation in select cases. Clinicians may utilize a range of endoscopic and radiological techniques to diagnose and control the source of haemorrhage, which should be tailored to the site of bleeding and pathology. When haemostasis is not achieved, either repeat intervention or a different modality should be selected. Surgery is now infrequently used as a treatment for GI haemorrhage and should be contemplated only once endoscopic and radiological treatments have failed, following discussion between senior clinicians. Postoperative GI bleeding may still be best served with return to theatre, but interventional radiology should also be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信