突尼斯人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的潜在健康影响和成本效益:一项比较模型研究

IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Oumaima Laraj , Beya Benzina , Ahlem Gzara , Amira Kebir , Kaja Abbas , Slimane BenMiled
{"title":"突尼斯人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的潜在健康影响和成本效益:一项比较模型研究","authors":"Oumaima Laraj ,&nbsp;Beya Benzina ,&nbsp;Ahlem Gzara ,&nbsp;Amira Kebir ,&nbsp;Kaja Abbas ,&nbsp;Slimane BenMiled","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Cervical cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers affecting women especially in low- and middle income countries and is caused by persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV vaccination can significantly reduce the cervical cancer burden. However, HPV vaccination is not yet included in the Tunisian immunization program. To inform decision-making on HPV vaccine introduction in Tunisia, we conducted a comparative modeling study to project the health impact and cost-effectiveness of four HPV vaccines (Cecolin, Cervarix, Gardasil, 4, and Gardasil-9) targeted to 12-year-old girls in 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We used two static cohort models (UNIVAC and Papillomavirus Rapid Interface for Modeling and Economics (PRIME)) to estimate the health and economic impact of HPV vaccination from the health system and societal perspectives. Our data inputs to the model include demography and cervical cancer burden as well as unit costs for treatment, vaccines, and vaccine delivery. We estimated health impact in terms of cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by HPV vaccination, and economic impact in terms of vaccination costs, treatment costs saved, net cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We estimated that Cecolin is the most cost-effective HPV vaccine in Tunisia, particularly when cross-protection is considered. Despite Cervarix offering greater health benefits of 70% versus 62% reductions in cervical cancer cases and deaths at 87% coverage, Cecolin has lower net costs and is more favorable across different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. At a WTP of USD 1169 per DALY averted (30% of Tunisia’s GDP per capita), Cecolin and Cervarix demonstrate similar probabilities of being cost-effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Based on the vaccine impact estimates generated by the UNIVAC and PRIME models, we inferred that the four HPV vaccines (Cecolin, Cervarix Gardasil,4, and Gardasil-9) were cost-effective in the Tunisian context. This evidence is useful to inform HPV vaccine introduction in Tunisia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential health impact and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Tunisia: A comparative modeling study\",\"authors\":\"Oumaima Laraj ,&nbsp;Beya Benzina ,&nbsp;Ahlem Gzara ,&nbsp;Amira Kebir ,&nbsp;Kaja Abbas ,&nbsp;Slimane BenMiled\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Cervical cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers affecting women especially in low- and middle income countries and is caused by persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV vaccination can significantly reduce the cervical cancer burden. However, HPV vaccination is not yet included in the Tunisian immunization program. To inform decision-making on HPV vaccine introduction in Tunisia, we conducted a comparative modeling study to project the health impact and cost-effectiveness of four HPV vaccines (Cecolin, Cervarix, Gardasil, 4, and Gardasil-9) targeted to 12-year-old girls in 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We used two static cohort models (UNIVAC and Papillomavirus Rapid Interface for Modeling and Economics (PRIME)) to estimate the health and economic impact of HPV vaccination from the health system and societal perspectives. Our data inputs to the model include demography and cervical cancer burden as well as unit costs for treatment, vaccines, and vaccine delivery. We estimated health impact in terms of cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by HPV vaccination, and economic impact in terms of vaccination costs, treatment costs saved, net cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We estimated that Cecolin is the most cost-effective HPV vaccine in Tunisia, particularly when cross-protection is considered. Despite Cervarix offering greater health benefits of 70% versus 62% reductions in cervical cancer cases and deaths at 87% coverage, Cecolin has lower net costs and is more favorable across different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. At a WTP of USD 1169 per DALY averted (30% of Tunisia’s GDP per capita), Cecolin and Cervarix demonstrate similar probabilities of being cost-effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Based on the vaccine impact estimates generated by the UNIVAC and PRIME models, we inferred that the four HPV vaccines (Cecolin, Cervarix Gardasil,4, and Gardasil-9) were cost-effective in the Tunisian context. This evidence is useful to inform HPV vaccine introduction in Tunisia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine: X\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225001068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225001068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宫颈癌是影响妇女的最普遍的癌症之一,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,是由人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)持续感染引起的。接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗可显著减轻子宫颈癌的负担。然而,HPV疫苗接种尚未包括在突尼斯免疫规划中。为了为突尼斯引入HPV疫苗的决策提供信息,我们进行了一项比较模型研究,以预测2025年针对12岁女孩的四种HPV疫苗(Cecolin, Cervarix, Gardasil, 4和Gardasil-9)的健康影响和成本效益。方法:我们使用两个静态队列模型(UNIVAC和乳头瘤病毒快速建模和经济学接口(PRIME))从卫生系统和社会角度估计HPV疫苗接种的健康和经济影响。我们对模型的数据输入包括人口统计学和宫颈癌负担,以及治疗、疫苗和疫苗交付的单位成本。我们从HPV疫苗接种避免的病例、死亡和残疾调整生命年(DALYs)方面估计了健康影响,从疫苗接种成本、节省的治疗成本、净成本和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)方面估计了经济影响。结果:我们估计Cecolin是突尼斯最具成本效益的HPV疫苗,特别是考虑到交叉保护时。尽管Cervarix提供了更大的健康效益,在87%的覆盖率下,宫颈癌病例和死亡减少了70%,而Cecolin的净成本更低,并且在不同的支付意愿(WTP)阈值上更有利。每个DALY所避免的WTP为1169美元(相当于突尼斯人均GDP的30%),Cecolin和Cervarix显示出相似的成本效益可能性。结论:根据UNIVAC和PRIME模型产生的疫苗影响估计,我们推断四种HPV疫苗(Cecolin, Cervarix Gardasil,4和Gardasil-9)在突尼斯的情况下具有成本效益。这一证据有助于为突尼斯引入HPV疫苗提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential health impact and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Tunisia: A comparative modeling study

Background:

Cervical cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers affecting women especially in low- and middle income countries and is caused by persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV vaccination can significantly reduce the cervical cancer burden. However, HPV vaccination is not yet included in the Tunisian immunization program. To inform decision-making on HPV vaccine introduction in Tunisia, we conducted a comparative modeling study to project the health impact and cost-effectiveness of four HPV vaccines (Cecolin, Cervarix, Gardasil, 4, and Gardasil-9) targeted to 12-year-old girls in 2025.

Methods:

We used two static cohort models (UNIVAC and Papillomavirus Rapid Interface for Modeling and Economics (PRIME)) to estimate the health and economic impact of HPV vaccination from the health system and societal perspectives. Our data inputs to the model include demography and cervical cancer burden as well as unit costs for treatment, vaccines, and vaccine delivery. We estimated health impact in terms of cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by HPV vaccination, and economic impact in terms of vaccination costs, treatment costs saved, net cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results:

We estimated that Cecolin is the most cost-effective HPV vaccine in Tunisia, particularly when cross-protection is considered. Despite Cervarix offering greater health benefits of 70% versus 62% reductions in cervical cancer cases and deaths at 87% coverage, Cecolin has lower net costs and is more favorable across different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. At a WTP of USD 1169 per DALY averted (30% of Tunisia’s GDP per capita), Cecolin and Cervarix demonstrate similar probabilities of being cost-effective.

Conclusion:

Based on the vaccine impact estimates generated by the UNIVAC and PRIME models, we inferred that the four HPV vaccines (Cecolin, Cervarix Gardasil,4, and Gardasil-9) were cost-effective in the Tunisian context. This evidence is useful to inform HPV vaccine introduction in Tunisia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信