揭示大流行驱动的出行转变:华盛顿特区共享单车和出租车系统的S-GTWR分析

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jianmin Jia , Shiyu He , Hui Zhang , Yan Xiao
{"title":"揭示大流行驱动的出行转变:华盛顿特区共享单车和出租车系统的S-GTWR分析","authors":"Jianmin Jia ,&nbsp;Shiyu He ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yan Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comprehensive analysis of urban transportation systems is essential for effective planning and management. As a representative combination of public and private mobility services, bike-sharing and taxi systems have undergone dynamic changes, particularly during public health crises. This study employs a semi-parametric Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (S-GTWR) model to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of socio-demographic, land use, traffic service, and weather-related factors on bike-sharing and taxi ridership in Washington, D.C., throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent recovery stages. Utilizing census block group-level data, the findings reveal that bike-sharing usage rebounded to near pre-pandemic levels by 2021–2022, whereas taxi ridership remained at approximately 30 % of its pre-pandemic volume. This disparity highlights significant shifts in mobility behavior. Among several models tested, including OLS, GWR, TWR, and GTWR, the S-GTWR model demonstrated superior performance and was selected for spatiotemporal pattern analysis. The model effectively captured dynamic changes in influencing factors by differentiating between trip origins and destinations, thereby offering valuable insights for policymaking. Notably, the variable representing households without vehicles (AUO) was negatively associated with pre-pandemic trip volume, suggesting a behavioral shift during the pandemic from public transit toward alternative modes like bike-sharing and taxis. These results underscore the importance of targeted mobility strategies in response to evolving travel behaviors. The findings provide actionable insights for urban planners and transportation operators to optimize mobility services and enhance urban resilience during public health crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 106802"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling pandemic-driven mobility shifts: A S-GTWR analysis of bike-sharing and taxi systems in Washington, D.C\",\"authors\":\"Jianmin Jia ,&nbsp;Shiyu He ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yan Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A comprehensive analysis of urban transportation systems is essential for effective planning and management. As a representative combination of public and private mobility services, bike-sharing and taxi systems have undergone dynamic changes, particularly during public health crises. This study employs a semi-parametric Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (S-GTWR) model to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of socio-demographic, land use, traffic service, and weather-related factors on bike-sharing and taxi ridership in Washington, D.C., throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent recovery stages. Utilizing census block group-level data, the findings reveal that bike-sharing usage rebounded to near pre-pandemic levels by 2021–2022, whereas taxi ridership remained at approximately 30 % of its pre-pandemic volume. This disparity highlights significant shifts in mobility behavior. Among several models tested, including OLS, GWR, TWR, and GTWR, the S-GTWR model demonstrated superior performance and was selected for spatiotemporal pattern analysis. The model effectively captured dynamic changes in influencing factors by differentiating between trip origins and destinations, thereby offering valuable insights for policymaking. Notably, the variable representing households without vehicles (AUO) was negatively associated with pre-pandemic trip volume, suggesting a behavioral shift during the pandemic from public transit toward alternative modes like bike-sharing and taxis. These results underscore the importance of targeted mobility strategies in response to evolving travel behaviors. The findings provide actionable insights for urban planners and transportation operators to optimize mobility services and enhance urban resilience during public health crises.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006766\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006766","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对城市交通系统进行全面分析是有效规划和管理的必要条件。作为公共和私人出行服务的代表性组合,共享单车和出租车系统经历了动态变化,特别是在公共卫生危机期间。本研究采用半参数地理和时间加权回归(S-GTWR)模型,定量评估了社会人口、土地利用、交通服务和天气相关因素在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及随后的恢复阶段对华盛顿特区共享单车和出租车乘客的影响。利用人口普查区块组级数据,研究结果显示,到2021-2022年,共享单车的使用量反弹至接近大流行前的水平,而出租车的使用量仍保持在大流行前的30%左右。这种差异凸显了流动性行为的重大转变。在OLS模型、GWR模型、TWR模型和GTWR模型中,S-GTWR模型表现优异,并被选择用于时空格局分析。该模型通过区分出发地和目的地,有效地捕捉了影响因素的动态变化,从而为政策制定提供了有价值的见解。值得注意的是,代表无车家庭(AUO)的变量与大流行前的出行量呈负相关,这表明大流行期间人们的行为从公共交通转向了共享单车和出租车等替代模式。这些结果强调了有针对性的出行策略在应对不断变化的出行行为方面的重要性。研究结果为城市规划者和交通运营商在公共卫生危机期间优化出行服务和增强城市韧性提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling pandemic-driven mobility shifts: A S-GTWR analysis of bike-sharing and taxi systems in Washington, D.C
A comprehensive analysis of urban transportation systems is essential for effective planning and management. As a representative combination of public and private mobility services, bike-sharing and taxi systems have undergone dynamic changes, particularly during public health crises. This study employs a semi-parametric Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (S-GTWR) model to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of socio-demographic, land use, traffic service, and weather-related factors on bike-sharing and taxi ridership in Washington, D.C., throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent recovery stages. Utilizing census block group-level data, the findings reveal that bike-sharing usage rebounded to near pre-pandemic levels by 2021–2022, whereas taxi ridership remained at approximately 30 % of its pre-pandemic volume. This disparity highlights significant shifts in mobility behavior. Among several models tested, including OLS, GWR, TWR, and GTWR, the S-GTWR model demonstrated superior performance and was selected for spatiotemporal pattern analysis. The model effectively captured dynamic changes in influencing factors by differentiating between trip origins and destinations, thereby offering valuable insights for policymaking. Notably, the variable representing households without vehicles (AUO) was negatively associated with pre-pandemic trip volume, suggesting a behavioral shift during the pandemic from public transit toward alternative modes like bike-sharing and taxis. These results underscore the importance of targeted mobility strategies in response to evolving travel behaviors. The findings provide actionable insights for urban planners and transportation operators to optimize mobility services and enhance urban resilience during public health crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信