Jennifer Ervin , Brendan Churchill , Leah Ruppanner , Tania King
{"title":"无报酬劳动和心理健康——在工作年龄的成年人中,公平感和满意度在分工中的作用;采用18波面板数据进行纵向分析","authors":"Jennifer Ervin , Brendan Churchill , Leah Ruppanner , Tania King","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Across the globe, the division of unpaid labour remains highly gendered and unequally shared. This has consequences for women's economic security and their ability to participate equally in paid work. Whilst unpaid labour time has been shown to be associated with poorer mental health, understanding how the unequal division of unpaid labour impacts mental health requires further scrutiny. Utilising 18 annual waves (2005–2022) of the HILDA survey, this study employed Mundlak modelling to examine the longitudinal association between perceptions of fairness and satisfaction in the division of key unpaid labour domains (household work and childcare) and mental health in working-age Australians (n = 8734). Mental health was assessed using the MHI-5 scale. All analyses were stratified by gender. Findings demonstrate that the mental health of both men and women is poorer when they are dissatisfied with the division of either domain of unpaid labour and when they perceive that they are doing <em>more</em> or <em>less</em> than one's fair share of both housework and childcare. Importantly, this research tells us that it is not only the objective division of unpaid labour that impacts mental health but also satisfaction and one's perceptions of fairness in that division.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118559"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpaid labour and mental health–the role of perceived fairness and satisfaction in division amongst working-age adults; a longitudinal analysis using 18 waves of panel data\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Ervin , Brendan Churchill , Leah Ruppanner , Tania King\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Across the globe, the division of unpaid labour remains highly gendered and unequally shared. This has consequences for women's economic security and their ability to participate equally in paid work. Whilst unpaid labour time has been shown to be associated with poorer mental health, understanding how the unequal division of unpaid labour impacts mental health requires further scrutiny. Utilising 18 annual waves (2005–2022) of the HILDA survey, this study employed Mundlak modelling to examine the longitudinal association between perceptions of fairness and satisfaction in the division of key unpaid labour domains (household work and childcare) and mental health in working-age Australians (n = 8734). Mental health was assessed using the MHI-5 scale. All analyses were stratified by gender. Findings demonstrate that the mental health of both men and women is poorer when they are dissatisfied with the division of either domain of unpaid labour and when they perceive that they are doing <em>more</em> or <em>less</em> than one's fair share of both housework and childcare. Importantly, this research tells us that it is not only the objective division of unpaid labour that impacts mental health but also satisfaction and one's perceptions of fairness in that division.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008901\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unpaid labour and mental health–the role of perceived fairness and satisfaction in division amongst working-age adults; a longitudinal analysis using 18 waves of panel data
Across the globe, the division of unpaid labour remains highly gendered and unequally shared. This has consequences for women's economic security and their ability to participate equally in paid work. Whilst unpaid labour time has been shown to be associated with poorer mental health, understanding how the unequal division of unpaid labour impacts mental health requires further scrutiny. Utilising 18 annual waves (2005–2022) of the HILDA survey, this study employed Mundlak modelling to examine the longitudinal association between perceptions of fairness and satisfaction in the division of key unpaid labour domains (household work and childcare) and mental health in working-age Australians (n = 8734). Mental health was assessed using the MHI-5 scale. All analyses were stratified by gender. Findings demonstrate that the mental health of both men and women is poorer when they are dissatisfied with the division of either domain of unpaid labour and when they perceive that they are doing more or less than one's fair share of both housework and childcare. Importantly, this research tells us that it is not only the objective division of unpaid labour that impacts mental health but also satisfaction and one's perceptions of fairness in that division.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.