多学科团队对骨折相关感染管理的影响:巴西的一项监测研究

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Icaro Santos Oliveira , Carlos Augusto Finelli , Taiana Cunha Ribeiro , Carolina Coelho Cunha , Thomas Stravinskas Durigon , Rodrigo Peixoto Vargas , Rafael Brull Tuma , Giselle Burlamaqui Klautau , Fernando Baldy dos Reis , Mauro Jose Salles
{"title":"多学科团队对骨折相关感染管理的影响:巴西的一项监测研究","authors":"Icaro Santos Oliveira ,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Finelli ,&nbsp;Taiana Cunha Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Carolina Coelho Cunha ,&nbsp;Thomas Stravinskas Durigon ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Peixoto Vargas ,&nbsp;Rafael Brull Tuma ,&nbsp;Giselle Burlamaqui Klautau ,&nbsp;Fernando Baldy dos Reis ,&nbsp;Mauro Jose Salles","doi":"10.1016/j.bjid.2025.104576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) is an increasing and challenging complication following orthopedic trauma surgery. Preventive and microbial diagnostic measures vary significantly particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objectives of this national questionnaire were to investigate clinical practices towards preventive and diagnostic strategies adopted by Brazilian orthopedic trauma centers and to assess the impact of Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) on the management of FRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 34-item electronic questionnaire was developed via REDCap® and distributed to all trauma surgeons registered of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a response rate of 24 %, the survey was fully responded by 140 trauma surgeons, 63.6 % of them working in southeast region centers. Collaborative work with MDT focused on musculoskeletal infections was reported by only 41.0 %. Cephalosporins were universally prescribed as Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PAP), while association with an aminoglycoside increased (35.0 %) for severe open fracture. One-day duration of PAP for closed fracture was prescribed in 68.1 %, while it often exceeded current recommendations. Diagnostic practices for FRI patients were primarily based on clinical signs and standard radiological and laboratory tests, with limited use of microbiological techniques. Trauma services working collaboratively with MDT significantly improved FRI management, including, use of sonication fluid for diagnosis (46.6 % vs. 26.8 %; <em>p</em> = 0.02), body weight-adjusted antibiotic dosing for PAP (50.0 % vs. 24.4 %; <em>p</em> = 0.02), appropriate duration of PAP according to the severity of soft-tissue damage (80.7 % vs. 59.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.01), infection risk stratification in elderly patients with fractures (45.6 % vs. 21.0 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), use of negative-pressure wound therapy (87.9 % vs. 54.9 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and regular collaboration with orthoplastic surgeon (44.8 % vs. 17.5 %; <em>p</em> = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This national survey revealed marked heterogeneity in FRI management across Brazilian trauma services. Ongoing MDT collaboration improved clinical practice, especially diagnostic work-up and antimicrobial stewardship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56327,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 104576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of a multidisciplinary team on the management of fracture-related infections: A surveillance study in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Icaro Santos Oliveira ,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Finelli ,&nbsp;Taiana Cunha Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Carolina Coelho Cunha ,&nbsp;Thomas Stravinskas Durigon ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Peixoto Vargas ,&nbsp;Rafael Brull Tuma ,&nbsp;Giselle Burlamaqui Klautau ,&nbsp;Fernando Baldy dos Reis ,&nbsp;Mauro Jose Salles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjid.2025.104576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) is an increasing and challenging complication following orthopedic trauma surgery. Preventive and microbial diagnostic measures vary significantly particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objectives of this national questionnaire were to investigate clinical practices towards preventive and diagnostic strategies adopted by Brazilian orthopedic trauma centers and to assess the impact of Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) on the management of FRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 34-item electronic questionnaire was developed via REDCap® and distributed to all trauma surgeons registered of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a response rate of 24 %, the survey was fully responded by 140 trauma surgeons, 63.6 % of them working in southeast region centers. Collaborative work with MDT focused on musculoskeletal infections was reported by only 41.0 %. Cephalosporins were universally prescribed as Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PAP), while association with an aminoglycoside increased (35.0 %) for severe open fracture. One-day duration of PAP for closed fracture was prescribed in 68.1 %, while it often exceeded current recommendations. Diagnostic practices for FRI patients were primarily based on clinical signs and standard radiological and laboratory tests, with limited use of microbiological techniques. Trauma services working collaboratively with MDT significantly improved FRI management, including, use of sonication fluid for diagnosis (46.6 % vs. 26.8 %; <em>p</em> = 0.02), body weight-adjusted antibiotic dosing for PAP (50.0 % vs. 24.4 %; <em>p</em> = 0.02), appropriate duration of PAP according to the severity of soft-tissue damage (80.7 % vs. 59.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.01), infection risk stratification in elderly patients with fractures (45.6 % vs. 21.0 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), use of negative-pressure wound therapy (87.9 % vs. 54.9 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and regular collaboration with orthoplastic surgeon (44.8 % vs. 17.5 %; <em>p</em> = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This national survey revealed marked heterogeneity in FRI management across Brazilian trauma services. Ongoing MDT collaboration improved clinical practice, especially diagnostic work-up and antimicrobial stewardship.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413867025000777\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413867025000777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨折相关感染(FRI)是骨科创伤手术后越来越多且具有挑战性的并发症。预防和微生物诊断措施差别很大,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。这项全国性问卷调查的目的是调查巴西骨科创伤中心采用的预防和诊断策略的临床实践,并评估多学科团队(MDT)对frid管理的影响。方法通过REDCap®开发了一份34项的电子问卷,并分发给在巴西骨科和创伤学会(SBOT)注册的所有创伤外科医生。结果140名创伤外科医生全面回复问卷,回复率为24%,其中63.6%在东南地区中心工作。与MDT合作治疗肌肉骨骼感染的比例仅为41.0%。头孢菌素被普遍用作围手术期抗生素预防(PAP),而在严重开放性骨折中与氨基糖苷的相关性增加(35.0%)。68.1%的患者使用PAP治疗闭合性骨折,但其使用时间经常超过目前的建议。FRI患者的诊断实践主要基于临床症状和标准放射学和实验室检查,微生物学技术的使用有限。创伤服务与MDT合作显著改善了FRI管理,包括使用超声液进行诊断(46.6%对26.8%,p = 0.02),根据体重调整PAP的抗生素剂量(50.0%对24.4%,p = 0.02),根据软组织损伤严重程度适当的PAP持续时间(80.7%对59.3%,p = 0.01),老年骨折患者的感染风险分层(45.6%对21.0%;P < 0.001),使用负压伤口治疗(87.9%对54.9%;P < 0.001)和定期与矫形外科医生合作(44.8%对17.5%;P = 0.01)。结论:这项全国调查揭示了巴西创伤服务部门在FRI管理方面的显著异质性。正在进行的MDT合作改善了临床实践,特别是诊断检查和抗菌药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of a multidisciplinary team on the management of fracture-related infections: A surveillance study in Brazil

Background

Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) is an increasing and challenging complication following orthopedic trauma surgery. Preventive and microbial diagnostic measures vary significantly particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objectives of this national questionnaire were to investigate clinical practices towards preventive and diagnostic strategies adopted by Brazilian orthopedic trauma centers and to assess the impact of Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) on the management of FRI.

Methods

A 34-item electronic questionnaire was developed via REDCap® and distributed to all trauma surgeons registered of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT).

Results

With a response rate of 24 %, the survey was fully responded by 140 trauma surgeons, 63.6 % of them working in southeast region centers. Collaborative work with MDT focused on musculoskeletal infections was reported by only 41.0 %. Cephalosporins were universally prescribed as Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis (PAP), while association with an aminoglycoside increased (35.0 %) for severe open fracture. One-day duration of PAP for closed fracture was prescribed in 68.1 %, while it often exceeded current recommendations. Diagnostic practices for FRI patients were primarily based on clinical signs and standard radiological and laboratory tests, with limited use of microbiological techniques. Trauma services working collaboratively with MDT significantly improved FRI management, including, use of sonication fluid for diagnosis (46.6 % vs. 26.8 %; p = 0.02), body weight-adjusted antibiotic dosing for PAP (50.0 % vs. 24.4 %; p = 0.02), appropriate duration of PAP according to the severity of soft-tissue damage (80.7 % vs. 59.3 %; p = 0.01), infection risk stratification in elderly patients with fractures (45.6 % vs. 21.0 %; p < 0.001), use of negative-pressure wound therapy (87.9 % vs. 54.9 %; p < 0.001) and regular collaboration with orthoplastic surgeon (44.8 % vs. 17.5 %; p = 0.01).

Conclusions

This national survey revealed marked heterogeneity in FRI management across Brazilian trauma services. Ongoing MDT collaboration improved clinical practice, especially diagnostic work-up and antimicrobial stewardship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
925
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (SBI). It aims to publish relevant articles in the broadest sense on all aspects of microbiology, infectious diseases and immune response to infectious agents. The BJID is a bimonthly publication and one of the most influential journals in its field in Brazil and Latin America with a high impact factor, since its inception it has garnered a growing share of the publishing market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信