“妇女和儿童”的道德吸引力

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Anastasiia D. Grigoreva Crean, Stella F. Lourenco, Arber Tasimi
{"title":"“妇女和儿童”的道德吸引力","authors":"Anastasiia D. Grigoreva Crean,&nbsp;Stella F. Lourenco,&nbsp;Arber Tasimi","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Victimized “women and children” are frequently featured in the media, yet the consequences of this phrase are far from clear. Across six experiments (<em>N</em> = 3115), we find that highlighting “women and children” as victims increases people's moral outrage, a strong emotional response to immoral acts that motivates people to want to punish wrongdoers. This effect could not be attributed to overestimating their victimization rates, to singling out just any victim group, or to equating “women and children” with civilians. Moreover, highlighting women as victims elicited moral outrage even when they were not paired with children or assumed to be mothers, suggesting that women's contribution to the moral pull of “women and children” is not reducible to these factors. Although women have the power to elicit moral outrage on their own, we find that this effect may be limited to gender-conforming women and may be related to the endorsement of traditional gender views as part of benevolent sexism. Altogether, these findings invite important questions regarding the long-term consequences of this phrase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 106320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The moral pull of “women and children”\",\"authors\":\"Anastasiia D. Grigoreva Crean,&nbsp;Stella F. Lourenco,&nbsp;Arber Tasimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Victimized “women and children” are frequently featured in the media, yet the consequences of this phrase are far from clear. Across six experiments (<em>N</em> = 3115), we find that highlighting “women and children” as victims increases people's moral outrage, a strong emotional response to immoral acts that motivates people to want to punish wrongdoers. This effect could not be attributed to overestimating their victimization rates, to singling out just any victim group, or to equating “women and children” with civilians. Moreover, highlighting women as victims elicited moral outrage even when they were not paired with children or assumed to be mothers, suggesting that women's contribution to the moral pull of “women and children” is not reducible to these factors. Although women have the power to elicit moral outrage on their own, we find that this effect may be limited to gender-conforming women and may be related to the endorsement of traditional gender views as part of benevolent sexism. Altogether, these findings invite important questions regarding the long-term consequences of this phrase.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002616\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受害的“妇女和儿童”经常出现在媒体上,但这个词的后果远不清楚。在六个实验中(N = 3115),我们发现强调“妇女和儿童”作为受害者会增加人们的道德愤怒,这是一种对不道德行为的强烈情绪反应,促使人们想要惩罚犯罪者。这种影响不能归因于高估他们的受害率,挑出任何受害者群体,或将“妇女和儿童”等同于平民。此外,强调女性作为受害者会引起道德上的愤怒,即使她们没有与孩子配对或被认为是母亲,这表明女性对“妇女和儿童”的道德吸引力的贡献不能归结为这些因素。尽管女性本身有能力引发道德愤怒,但我们发现这种影响可能仅限于性别认同的女性,并且可能与传统性别观点作为善意性别歧视的一部分的认可有关。总之,这些发现引发了关于这个短语的长期后果的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The moral pull of “women and children”
Victimized “women and children” are frequently featured in the media, yet the consequences of this phrase are far from clear. Across six experiments (N = 3115), we find that highlighting “women and children” as victims increases people's moral outrage, a strong emotional response to immoral acts that motivates people to want to punish wrongdoers. This effect could not be attributed to overestimating their victimization rates, to singling out just any victim group, or to equating “women and children” with civilians. Moreover, highlighting women as victims elicited moral outrage even when they were not paired with children or assumed to be mothers, suggesting that women's contribution to the moral pull of “women and children” is not reducible to these factors. Although women have the power to elicit moral outrage on their own, we find that this effect may be limited to gender-conforming women and may be related to the endorsement of traditional gender views as part of benevolent sexism. Altogether, these findings invite important questions regarding the long-term consequences of this phrase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信