通过监测医疗保健系统支持数字化转型。通过调整IPOO框架对欧洲经验方法进行比较分析

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Alessandro Vinci , Andrea Vandelli , Alessia Caputo , Milena Vainieri
{"title":"通过监测医疗保健系统支持数字化转型。通过调整IPOO框架对欧洲经验方法进行比较分析","authors":"Alessandro Vinci ,&nbsp;Andrea Vandelli ,&nbsp;Alessia Caputo ,&nbsp;Milena Vainieri","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how digital transformation (DT) is operationalized and measured within Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) across European Union (EU) countries. By conducting a documentary analysis of national HSPAs through the READ approach, we identified 11 EU countries that include digital health metrics and extracted a total of 93 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These indicators were systematically categorized using the Input-Process-Output-Outcome (IPOO) framework and clustered into four deductively derived domains and corresponding sub-domains. Building on this empirical foundation, we propose a novel conceptual framework that integrates theoretical and practical dimensions of DT monitoring. The framework assigns representative KPIs to each IPOO phase and highlights critical but currently under-monitored areas. Despite notable progress in areas such as electronic health records, telemedicine, and digital service usage, the findings reveal persistent challenges. Furthermore, significant variability exists across countries in the adoption and computability of DT indicators. By providing a structured model and a comprehensive pool of indicators, this study contributes to both academic literature and practical policymaking. It supports efforts to guide DT measurement across healthcare systems while maintaining the flexibility needed to adapt to diverse national contexts. Future research should explore the evolving integration of DT metrics and continue to address gaps that hinder effective performance monitoring and policy development in healthcare digitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 124340"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting the digital transformation journey through monitoring systems in healthcare. A comparative analysis of European empirical approaches through an adaptation of the IPOO framework\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Vinci ,&nbsp;Andrea Vandelli ,&nbsp;Alessia Caputo ,&nbsp;Milena Vainieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores how digital transformation (DT) is operationalized and measured within Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) across European Union (EU) countries. By conducting a documentary analysis of national HSPAs through the READ approach, we identified 11 EU countries that include digital health metrics and extracted a total of 93 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These indicators were systematically categorized using the Input-Process-Output-Outcome (IPOO) framework and clustered into four deductively derived domains and corresponding sub-domains. Building on this empirical foundation, we propose a novel conceptual framework that integrates theoretical and practical dimensions of DT monitoring. The framework assigns representative KPIs to each IPOO phase and highlights critical but currently under-monitored areas. Despite notable progress in areas such as electronic health records, telemedicine, and digital service usage, the findings reveal persistent challenges. Furthermore, significant variability exists across countries in the adoption and computability of DT indicators. By providing a structured model and a comprehensive pool of indicators, this study contributes to both academic literature and practical policymaking. It supports efforts to guide DT measurement across healthcare systems while maintaining the flexibility needed to adapt to diverse national contexts. Future research should explore the evolving integration of DT metrics and continue to address gaps that hinder effective performance monitoring and policy development in healthcare digitalization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003713\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了数字化转型(DT)如何在欧盟(EU)国家的卫生系统绩效评估(hspa)中实施和衡量。通过READ方法对国家hspa进行文献分析,我们确定了11个包含数字健康指标的欧盟国家,并提取了总共93个关键绩效指标(kpi)。使用投入-过程-产出-结果(IPOO)框架对这些指标进行了系统分类,并将其聚类到四个演绎衍生领域和相应的子领域。在此经验基础上,我们提出了一个新的概念框架,整合了DT监测的理论和实践维度。该框架为每个ipo阶段分配了具有代表性的关键绩效指标,并突出了关键但目前监测不足的领域。尽管在电子健康记录、远程医疗和数字服务使用等领域取得了显著进展,但调查结果揭示了持续存在的挑战。此外,各国在DT指标的采用和可计算性方面存在显著差异。通过提供一个结构化的模型和全面的指标池,本研究对学术文献和实际政策制定都有贡献。它支持在卫生保健系统中指导DT测量的工作,同时保持适应不同国情所需的灵活性。未来的研究应探索DT指标的不断整合,并继续解决阻碍医疗数字化有效绩效监测和政策制定的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting the digital transformation journey through monitoring systems in healthcare. A comparative analysis of European empirical approaches through an adaptation of the IPOO framework
This study explores how digital transformation (DT) is operationalized and measured within Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) across European Union (EU) countries. By conducting a documentary analysis of national HSPAs through the READ approach, we identified 11 EU countries that include digital health metrics and extracted a total of 93 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These indicators were systematically categorized using the Input-Process-Output-Outcome (IPOO) framework and clustered into four deductively derived domains and corresponding sub-domains. Building on this empirical foundation, we propose a novel conceptual framework that integrates theoretical and practical dimensions of DT monitoring. The framework assigns representative KPIs to each IPOO phase and highlights critical but currently under-monitored areas. Despite notable progress in areas such as electronic health records, telemedicine, and digital service usage, the findings reveal persistent challenges. Furthermore, significant variability exists across countries in the adoption and computability of DT indicators. By providing a structured model and a comprehensive pool of indicators, this study contributes to both academic literature and practical policymaking. It supports efforts to guide DT measurement across healthcare systems while maintaining the flexibility needed to adapt to diverse national contexts. Future research should explore the evolving integration of DT metrics and continue to address gaps that hinder effective performance monitoring and policy development in healthcare digitalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信