Bjarke Risgaard , Sebastian Wiberg , Jesper Kjærgaard , André Martin Korshin , Lene Holmvang , Jacob Eifer Møller , Peter Hasse Møller-Sørensen
{"title":"延长资格标准对难治性心脏骤停静脉-动脉体外膜氧合后生存的影响:一项为期8年的单中心研究","authors":"Bjarke Risgaard , Sebastian Wiberg , Jesper Kjærgaard , André Martin Korshin , Lene Holmvang , Jacob Eifer Møller , Peter Hasse Møller-Sørensen","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may improve survival in refractory in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA/OHCA), yet optimal selection criteria remain uncertain. We aimed to report contemporary survival rates after VA-ECMO for cardiac arrest (E-CPR) and to explore prognostic significance of extended criteria in improving patient selection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational single-center study of patients treated with E-CPR from 2017 to 2024. Patients were stratified according to four extended inclusion criteria in favor of E-CPR (arterial pH > 6.8, lactate < 15 mmol/L, low-flow time < 100 min, signs of life during CPR). Primary outcome was 180-day survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 159 patients included, 59 (37 %) were alive at 180 days, and 82 % of survivors had favorable neurological outcomes. Transient ROSC (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.13–0.49) and signs of life during CPR (OR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.19–0.75) were associated with lower mortality in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only age (OR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.00–1.06) and transient ROSC (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.11–0.56) remained independently associated with 180-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant differences between groups (log-rank <em>p</em> < 0.05), with survival ranging from 21 % in patients meeting none or one criterion in favor of E-CPR to 56 % in those meeting all four.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this single-center cohort, we observed a 180-day survival rate of 38 % among patients treated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. Notably, our study suggests acceptable survival rates of 21 % even in patients with an adverse risk profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of extended eligibility criteria on survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a 8-year single-center study\",\"authors\":\"Bjarke Risgaard , Sebastian Wiberg , Jesper Kjærgaard , André Martin Korshin , Lene Holmvang , Jacob Eifer Møller , Peter Hasse Møller-Sørensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may improve survival in refractory in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA/OHCA), yet optimal selection criteria remain uncertain. We aimed to report contemporary survival rates after VA-ECMO for cardiac arrest (E-CPR) and to explore prognostic significance of extended criteria in improving patient selection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational single-center study of patients treated with E-CPR from 2017 to 2024. Patients were stratified according to four extended inclusion criteria in favor of E-CPR (arterial pH > 6.8, lactate < 15 mmol/L, low-flow time < 100 min, signs of life during CPR). Primary outcome was 180-day survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 159 patients included, 59 (37 %) were alive at 180 days, and 82 % of survivors had favorable neurological outcomes. Transient ROSC (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.13–0.49) and signs of life during CPR (OR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.19–0.75) were associated with lower mortality in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only age (OR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.00–1.06) and transient ROSC (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.11–0.56) remained independently associated with 180-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant differences between groups (log-rank <em>p</em> < 0.05), with survival ranging from 21 % in patients meeting none or one criterion in favor of E-CPR to 56 % in those meeting all four.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this single-center cohort, we observed a 180-day survival rate of 38 % among patients treated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. Notably, our study suggests acceptable survival rates of 21 % even in patients with an adverse risk profile.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)可能提高难治性院内或院外心脏骤停(IHCA/OHCA)患者的生存率,但最佳选择标准仍不确定。我们的目的是报告心脏骤停(E-CPR)后VA-ECMO的当代生存率,并探讨扩展标准在改善患者选择方面的预后意义。方法对2017 - 2024年接受E-CPR治疗的患者进行单中心观察性研究。患者根据四项扩展纳入标准进行分层,以支持E-CPR(动脉pH = 6.8,乳酸= 15 mmol/L,低流量时间= 100 min,心肺复苏期间的生命体征)。主要终点为180天生存率。结果在纳入的159例患者中,59例(37%)在180天存活,82%的幸存者具有良好的神经预后。单因素分析显示,短暂ROSC (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.49)和心肺复苏期间的生命体征(OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.75)与较低的死亡率相关。在多变量分析中,只有年龄(OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06)和短暂ROSC (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.56)仍然与180天死亡率独立相关。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示各组之间存在显著差异(log-rank p < 0.05),生存率从不满足E-CPR或满足其中一个标准的患者的21%到满足所有四个标准的患者的56%不等。结论:在这个单中心队列中,我们观察到接受E-CPR治疗难治性心脏骤停的患者180天生存率为38%。值得注意的是,我们的研究表明,即使在有不良风险的患者中,可接受的生存率为21%。
Impact of extended eligibility criteria on survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a 8-year single-center study
Aim
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may improve survival in refractory in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA/OHCA), yet optimal selection criteria remain uncertain. We aimed to report contemporary survival rates after VA-ECMO for cardiac arrest (E-CPR) and to explore prognostic significance of extended criteria in improving patient selection.
Methods
We conducted an observational single-center study of patients treated with E-CPR from 2017 to 2024. Patients were stratified according to four extended inclusion criteria in favor of E-CPR (arterial pH > 6.8, lactate < 15 mmol/L, low-flow time < 100 min, signs of life during CPR). Primary outcome was 180-day survival.
Results
Of 159 patients included, 59 (37 %) were alive at 180 days, and 82 % of survivors had favorable neurological outcomes. Transient ROSC (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.13–0.49) and signs of life during CPR (OR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.19–0.75) were associated with lower mortality in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only age (OR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.00–1.06) and transient ROSC (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.11–0.56) remained independently associated with 180-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant differences between groups (log-rank p < 0.05), with survival ranging from 21 % in patients meeting none or one criterion in favor of E-CPR to 56 % in those meeting all four.
Conclusion
In this single-center cohort, we observed a 180-day survival rate of 38 % among patients treated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. Notably, our study suggests acceptable survival rates of 21 % even in patients with an adverse risk profile.