{"title":"强化学习从人类反馈与快速慢速更新稳定的驾驶策略","authors":"Hengcong Guo, Rohan Khaire, Junfeng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising framework for decision-making in automated vehicles (AVs), yet its practical application faces major obstacles, including sparse and delayed rewards, unstable policy optimization, and difficulties in designing effective reward functions. To address these challenges, we propose a human-in-the-loop RL framework with a fast–slow update architecture that enables reward-free training while maintaining policy stability. The fast update relies on direct feedback during human takeovers, using binary preference signals to guide the agent in early training. The slow update introduces a similarity constraint by comparing the agent’s actions to those of an auxiliary expert network trained exclusively on human-labeled transitions. This dual-update strategy allows the agent to benefit from efficient exploration while remaining anchored to human-aligned behavior. The method optimizes a combined objective consisting of temporal difference loss, proxy value loss from human preferences, and a similarity loss. Experiments conducted in the CARLA simulator demonstrate that this approach achieves lower takeover rates, faster convergence, and improved driving stability compared to standard RL methods. These results highlight the effectiveness of structured human feedback in reducing training burden and enhancing real-world readiness of autonomous driving policies. The code is available at: <span><span>https://github.com/BELIV-ASU/aPVP0.9.10.1.git</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinforcement learning from human feedback with fast–slow updates for stable driving strategies\",\"authors\":\"Hengcong Guo, Rohan Khaire, Junfeng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising framework for decision-making in automated vehicles (AVs), yet its practical application faces major obstacles, including sparse and delayed rewards, unstable policy optimization, and difficulties in designing effective reward functions. To address these challenges, we propose a human-in-the-loop RL framework with a fast–slow update architecture that enables reward-free training while maintaining policy stability. The fast update relies on direct feedback during human takeovers, using binary preference signals to guide the agent in early training. The slow update introduces a similarity constraint by comparing the agent’s actions to those of an auxiliary expert network trained exclusively on human-labeled transitions. This dual-update strategy allows the agent to benefit from efficient exploration while remaining anchored to human-aligned behavior. The method optimizes a combined objective consisting of temporal difference loss, proxy value loss from human preferences, and a similarity loss. Experiments conducted in the CARLA simulator demonstrate that this approach achieves lower takeover rates, faster convergence, and improved driving stability compared to standard RL methods. These results highlight the effectiveness of structured human feedback in reducing training burden and enhancing real-world readiness of autonomous driving policies. The code is available at: <span><span>https://github.com/BELIV-ASU/aPVP0.9.10.1.git</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125003119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125003119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reinforcement learning from human feedback with fast–slow updates for stable driving strategies
Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising framework for decision-making in automated vehicles (AVs), yet its practical application faces major obstacles, including sparse and delayed rewards, unstable policy optimization, and difficulties in designing effective reward functions. To address these challenges, we propose a human-in-the-loop RL framework with a fast–slow update architecture that enables reward-free training while maintaining policy stability. The fast update relies on direct feedback during human takeovers, using binary preference signals to guide the agent in early training. The slow update introduces a similarity constraint by comparing the agent’s actions to those of an auxiliary expert network trained exclusively on human-labeled transitions. This dual-update strategy allows the agent to benefit from efficient exploration while remaining anchored to human-aligned behavior. The method optimizes a combined objective consisting of temporal difference loss, proxy value loss from human preferences, and a similarity loss. Experiments conducted in the CARLA simulator demonstrate that this approach achieves lower takeover rates, faster convergence, and improved driving stability compared to standard RL methods. These results highlight the effectiveness of structured human feedback in reducing training burden and enhancing real-world readiness of autonomous driving policies. The code is available at: https://github.com/BELIV-ASU/aPVP0.9.10.1.git.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.